City Launch Legal Challenge Against PL Charges & Barrister

[blues2win]

The clarification will take time to arrive. Even other Clubs legal departments were wary of ploughing ahead as Masters wanted to to cover his embarrassment. The PL has had to climb down. Rushing ahead into another legal mess was crazy as City warned.

[Indianablue]

Premier League cannot run a bath. The recent climbdown from Masters is another example. The man is simply a clown. Simon Jordan described him as a middle manager, not a leader. That is a great compliment to this man he is a buffoon but i suspect he is very gifted at toadying up to the right people. Life really is a cesspool, the big bits rise to the top.
The US owners must be loving his continual fuck ups.
Its lovely to watch.
Meanwhile the media continue with the negative stories on all sorts of topics. I do detect a few chinks though where light is shining from a few lightbulbs being switched on by Martin Samuel, Prestwich Blue, Big Sam, Stefan ( although he's been inaccurate of late)

[carl_feedthegoat]

https://www.footballinsider247.com/stef ... rial-news/

[johnny crossan]

Thought I'd share this interesting Parliamentary response to my complaint to the BBC about Banned Roan and the appalling BBC bias against us. (Original complaint as posted on here below)



Dear (my local MP),

I am contacting you as a long standing Man City supporter who is very unhappy about the BBC's biased coverage of my club over many years.

I would like to make you aware of my complaint to them about an article they published today as below and ask if it would it be possible for you to pass it on to Lisa Nandy, the Secretary of State with responsibility for these matters.

it would be a bonus if you happen to agree with my views and can endorse them of course but I fully recognise they are not entirely neutral in the matter although would argue are considerably more balanced than those of our national broadcaster.


BBC Complaints - Case number CAS-7928353-B5P0L0

"Prejudicial Reporting 

"Man City case 'moral reward' for Football Leaks hacker, lawyer claims".

The above headline echoes the purpose of this article, which is clearly intended to defend a convicted extortionist whose corrupted evidence was comprehensively exposed by CAS two years ago after it was misused by UEFA to charge Manchester City with sponsorship wrongdoing under pressure from its elite rivals . Those same teams now control the Premier League, forcing it to repeat their earlier failed attempt to damage City using the identical doctored emails and once again relying on the full-throated support of your Sports Editor Dan Roan to endorse their blatantly racist, anti-arab media narratives . This outrageous piece is just the latest example of Roan's many attempts to smear the club following his permanent banning by them in 2012 for lying about Patrick Vieira. Over the years he has abused his position by enthusiastically promoting every element of the redshirt cartel's relentless anti-City propaganda campaign as it moved from 'state ownership' to 'financial doping' to 'sportswashing' and now the 'dirty cheating oil club ' slur. When these current confected charges are again dismissed as baseless the BBC will surely have to answer for his conduct (and that of subordinates under his direction) in nearly a decade of disgracefully biased reporting about Man City by our national broadcaster and the reputational damage it has unjustly inflicted as a result".

[john@staustell]

Best write to OFCOM Mr Redacted!

Well done though

[blues2win]

https://x.com/mcfc_lads/status/18461459 ... 9Awxy5lqVQ

PL’s emergency meeting cancelled.

[Mase]

When is the 115 thing supposed to be resolved? Do we know?

[john@staustell]

https://x.com/mcfc_lads/status/1846145909220168132?s=61&t=6ifllXVJePmO9Awxy5lqVQ

PL’s emergency meeting cancelled.

Battle resumed on Mail comments on this story

[john@staustell]

When is the 115 thing supposed to be resolved? Do we know?

10 weeks it was scheduled for. Assuming no delays, which is unlikely I would think

[blues2win]

It will take a long time to write up the decisions on the various charges. Hundreds of pages long no doubt. Every paragraph will be painstakingly gone over by the PL and City assuming an appeal by one side or the other which looks likely. In the circumstances the Commission will take a long time finalising it. Early next year looks favourite. January to March at a guess.

[Mase]

When is the 115 thing supposed to be resolved? Do we know?

10 weeks it was scheduled for. Assuming no delays, which is unlikely I would think

Nice one. Hopefully hear something this side of Christmas then. What a Christmas present that would be - Danny Tiatto, Michael Brown, Tony Vaughn and the boys back!!!

[zuricity]

I think we will be ok and there is no need to Pannick. It is just lawyers now milking it for 10 weeks. Probably playing snooker after lunch each day.

[blues2win]

The ten weeks estimate was for the hearings. After that the Commission has to meet to decide painstakingly their verdicts on all the charges. Then they have to write up their findings and reasons for them. We’re talking a voluminous report very carefully crafted paragraph by paragraph. I’d be very surprised if there’s an announcement this side of Xmas.

[sheblue]

Judging by how long the APT thing took, I cant see the 115 coming to a conclusion any time soon. Don't even know if it will ever be fully concluded.

[Indianablue]

Thought I'd share this interesting Parliamentary response to my complaint to the BBC about Banned Roan and the appalling BBC bias against us. (Original complaint as posted on here below)



Dear (my local MP),

I am contacting you as a long standing Man City supporter who is very unhappy about the BBC's biased coverage of my club over many years.

I would like to make you aware of my complaint to them about an article they published today as below and ask if it would it be possible for you to pass it on to Lisa Nandy, the Secretary of State with responsibility for these matters.

it would be a bonus if you happen to agree with my views and can endorse them of course but I fully recognise they are not entirely neutral in the matter although would argue are considerably more balanced than those of our national broadcaster.


BBC Complaints - Case number CAS-7928353-B5P0L0

"Prejudicial Reporting 

"Man City case 'moral reward' for Football Leaks hacker, lawyer claims".

The above headline echoes the purpose of this article, which is clearly intended to defend a convicted extortionist whose corrupted evidence was comprehensively exposed by CAS two years ago after it was misused by UEFA to charge Manchester City with sponsorship wrongdoing under pressure from its elite rivals . Those same teams now control the Premier League, forcing it to repeat their earlier failed attempt to damage City using the identical doctored emails and once again relying on the full-throated support of your Sports Editor Dan Roan to endorse their blatantly racist, anti-arab media narratives . This outrageous piece is just the latest example of Roan's many attempts to smear the club following his permanent banning by them in 2012 for lying about Patrick Vieira. Over the years he has abused his position by enthusiastically promoting every element of the redshirt cartel's relentless anti-City propaganda campaign as it moved from 'state ownership' to 'financial doping' to 'sportswashing' and now the 'dirty cheating oil club ' slur. When these current confected charges are again dismissed as baseless the BBC will surely have to answer for his conduct (and that of subordinates under his direction) in nearly a decade of disgracefully biased reporting about Man City by our national broadcaster and the reputational damage it has unjustly inflicted as a result".

Pissing in the wind.

[john@staustell]

When is the 115 thing supposed to be resolved? Do we know?

10 weeks it was scheduled for. Assuming no delays, which is unlikely I would think

Nice one. Hopefully hear something this side of Christmas then. What a Christmas present that would be - Danny Tiatto, Michael Brown, Tony Vaughn and the boys back!!!

Forgot to say, they are scheduled to deliberate afterwards, with no outcome until spring 2025.

If we lose, the club will take it further, as far as needed. At some point the cartel and Masters, if they have any sense, will of course 'sue for peace"

[Original Dub]

So, no wrong doing on his part...

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/20 ... ster-city/

[john@staustell]

Good old Arsene

https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk ... r-30224086

[Original Dub]

Am I way off or does the Rags brand new CEO not see jail time if we're guilty if fraud and he was a main player

[CTID Hants]

Am I way off or does the Rags brand new CEO not see jail time if we're guilty if fraud and he was a main player

Rags put a statement out last week saying that nobody currently working for them that worked for us at the time would get done....

My take on it was that if they won't get done, they kind of know we won't get done, if that makes sense.

That and the recent Venger comments makes me feel that people within footie know we won't get done....

That said, I am not reading all the in depth shit, as I am sick of it.