Spurs without Gomes..

Here is the place to talk about all things city and football!

Spurs without Gomes..

Postby Vhero » Sun May 09, 2010 5:10 pm

Spurs Just got stuffed 4-2 off Burnley without Gomes... I know its the end of the season but it was the same team that beat us minus Gomes. I honestly thought he was the reason we lost that game and today just proves he is the reason they got 4th over us as this season he has been working miracles for them. I hear he is shit on crosses but seems we couldn't catch him out last week so either he has improved on that part of his game or we are shit at crossing (today would prove the former).

Discuss..
User avatar
Vhero
Paul Power's Tash
 
Posts: 10613
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2007 6:56 pm
Location: Manchester
Supporter of: MCFC
My favourite player is: Kinkladze

Re: Spurs without Gomes..

Postby Original Dub » Sun May 09, 2010 5:12 pm

Vhero wrote:Spurs Just got stuffed 4-2 off Burnley without Gomes... I know its the end of the season but it was the same team that beat us minus Gomes. I honestly thought he was the reason we lost that game and today just proves he is the reason they got 4th over us as this season he has been working miracles for them. I hear he is shit on crosses but seems we couldn't catch him out last week so either he has improved on that part of his game or we are shit at crossing (today would prove the former).

Discuss..
Original Dub
 

Re: Spurs without Gomes..

Postby Slim » Sun May 09, 2010 5:13 pm

Go do one.

Discuss.
Image
User avatar
Slim
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 30344
Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2006 3:57 am
Location: Perth

Re: Spurs without Gomes..

Postby Mike J » Sun May 09, 2010 5:16 pm

Vhero wrote:Spurs Just got stuffed 4-2 off Burnley without Gomes... I know its the end of the season but it was the same team that beat us minus Gomes. I honestly thought he was the reason we lost that game and today just proves he is the reason they got 4th over us as this season he has been working miracles for them. I hear he is shit on crosses but seems we couldn't catch him out last week so either he has improved on that part of his game or we are shit at crossing (today would prove the former).

Discuss..

why?
User avatar
Mike J
Dickov's Injury Time Equaliser
 
Posts: 4852
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2006 1:48 pm
Supporter of: Who do you think
My favourite player is: Merlin

Re: Spurs without Gomes..

Postby Douglas Higginbottom » Sun May 09, 2010 5:25 pm

Vhero wrote:Spurs Just got stuffed 4-2 off Burnley without Gomes... I know its the end of the season but it was the same team that beat us minus Gomes. I honestly thought he was the reason we lost that game and today just proves he is the reason they got 4th over us as this season he has been working miracles for them. I hear he is shit on crosses but seems we couldn't catch him out last week so either he has improved on that part of his game or we are shit at crossing (today would prove the former).

Discuss..


Ok I'll bite. We didn't lose to Spurs because of Gomes but because Spurs were the better side.
Spurs didn't lose to Burnley because Gomes was missing but because they had already beaten City and didn't need the points.

Is that sufficient discussion?
Douglas Higginbottom
Paul Power's Tash
 
Posts: 10685
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 10:42 pm

Re: Spurs without Gomes..

Postby Dubciteh » Sun May 09, 2010 5:26 pm

Douglas Higginbottom wrote:
Vhero wrote:Spurs Just got stuffed 4-2 off Burnley without Gomes... I know its the end of the season but it was the same team that beat us minus Gomes. I honestly thought he was the reason we lost that game and today just proves he is the reason they got 4th over us as this season he has been working miracles for them. I hear he is shit on crosses but seems we couldn't catch him out last week so either he has improved on that part of his game or we are shit at crossing (today would prove the former).

Discuss..


Ok I'll bite. We didn't lose to Spurs because of Gomes but because Spurs were the better side.
Spurs didn't lose to Burnley because Gomes was missing but because they had already beaten City and didn't need the points.

Is that sufficient discussion?


QED
derby day the scores were level,
then the goat was fed by neville,
silly boy should know for sure,
feed the goat and he will score!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
User avatar
Dubciteh
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Denis Tueart's Overhead
 
Posts: 8628
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 5:49 am
Location: Dublin
Supporter of: CTID
My favourite player is: Merlin

Re: Spurs without Gomes..

Postby Zezou » Sun May 09, 2010 6:35 pm

Douglas Higginbottom wrote:
Ok I'll bite. We didn't lose to Spurs because of Gomes but because Spurs were the better side.
Spurs didn't lose to Burnley because Gomes was missing but because they had already beaten City and didn't need the points.

Is that sufficient discussion?



^^^ this.

& you can argue it wouldnt have made much difference as he hardly made any "class" saves.

Matter of fact the only save of real note I remember him making would have been an own goal!

Centre backs where the difference for spurs last wednesday, not the gk
Zezou
Horlock's Aggressive Walk
 
Posts: 505
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 12:20 pm
Location: Manchester

Re: Spurs without Gomes..

Postby Vhero » Sun May 09, 2010 6:44 pm

Douglas Higginbottom wrote:
Vhero wrote:Spurs Just got stuffed 4-2 off Burnley without Gomes... I know its the end of the season but it was the same team that beat us minus Gomes. I honestly thought he was the reason we lost that game and today just proves he is the reason they got 4th over us as this season he has been working miracles for them. I hear he is shit on crosses but seems we couldn't catch him out last week so either he has improved on that part of his game or we are shit at crossing (today would prove the former).

Discuss..


Ok I'll bite. We didn't lose to Spurs because of Gomes but because Spurs were the better side.
Spurs didn't lose to Burnley because Gomes was missing but because they had already beaten City and didn't need the points.

Is that sufficient discussion?


You honestly think that?? You honestly think because they didn't need the points they lost on purpose?? These are fucking professional football players. what a childish fucking argument. I wonder why I bother sometimes. I thought I was posting on a board where people knew shit about footbal, l I forgot where I was posting.. Sorry I won't make that mistake again when making a topic...
Last edited by Vhero on Sun May 09, 2010 6:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Vhero
Paul Power's Tash
 
Posts: 10613
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2007 6:56 pm
Location: Manchester
Supporter of: MCFC
My favourite player is: Kinkladze

Re: Spurs without Gomes..

Postby Original Dub » Sun May 09, 2010 6:45 pm

Vhero wrote:
Douglas Higginbottom wrote:
Vhero wrote:Spurs Just got stuffed 4-2 off Burnley without Gomes... I know its the end of the season but it was the same team that beat us minus Gomes. I honestly thought he was the reason we lost that game and today just proves he is the reason they got 4th over us as this season he has been working miracles for them. I hear he is shit on crosses but seems we couldn't catch him out last week so either he has improved on that part of his game or we are shit at crossing (today would prove the former).

Discuss..


Ok I'll bite. We didn't lose to Spurs because of Gomes but because Spurs were the better side.
Spurs didn't lose to Burnley because Gomes was missing but because they had already beaten City and didn't need the points.

Is that sufficient discussion?


You honestly think that?? You honestly think because they didn't need the points they lost on purpose?? These are fucking professional football players. what a childish fucking argument. I wonder why I bother sometimes.



ah hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

meh time to move on lol
Original Dub
 

Re: Spurs without Gomes..

Postby Zezou » Sun May 09, 2010 6:53 pm

Vhero wrote:
Douglas Higginbottom wrote:
Vhero wrote:Spurs Just got stuffed 4-2 off Burnley without Gomes... I know its the end of the season but it was the same team that beat us minus Gomes. I honestly thought he was the reason we lost that game and today just proves he is the reason they got 4th over us as this season he has been working miracles for them. I hear he is shit on crosses but seems we couldn't catch him out last week so either he has improved on that part of his game or we are shit at crossing (today would prove the former).

Discuss..


Ok I'll bite. We didn't lose to Spurs because of Gomes but because Spurs were the better side.
Spurs didn't lose to Burnley because Gomes was missing but because they had already beaten City and didn't need the points.

Is that sufficient discussion?


You honestly think that?? You honestly think because they didn't need the points they lost on purpose?? These are fucking professional football players. what a childish fucking argument. I wonder why I bother sometimes. I thought I was posting on a board where people knew shit about footbal, l I forgot where I was posting.. Sorry I won't make that mistake again when making a topic...


lmao do you think spurs would have lost to burnley if they'd drawn against us??? especially after leading 2-0, doubt it...
Zezou
Horlock's Aggressive Walk
 
Posts: 505
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 12:20 pm
Location: Manchester

Re: Spurs without Gomes..

Postby Douglas Higginbottom » Sun May 09, 2010 6:54 pm

Original Dub wrote:
Vhero wrote:
Douglas Higginbottom wrote:
Vhero wrote:Spurs Just got stuffed 4-2 off Burnley without Gomes... I know its the end of the season but it was the same team that beat us minus Gomes. I honestly thought he was the reason we lost that game and today just proves he is the reason they got 4th over us as this season he has been working miracles for them. I hear he is shit on crosses but seems we couldn't catch him out last week so either he has improved on that part of his game or we are shit at crossing (today would prove the former).

Discuss..


Ok I'll bite. We didn't lose to Spurs because of Gomes but because Spurs were the better side.
Spurs didn't lose to Burnley because Gomes was missing but because they had already beaten City and didn't need the points.

Is that sufficient discussion?


You honestly think that?? You honestly think because they didn't need the points they lost on purpose?? These are fucking professional football players. what a childish fucking argument. I wonder why I bother sometimes.



ah hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

meh time to move on lol



hehehe correct OD.

No Vhero sir I didn't say they lost on purpose but that they didn't need the points.There is a world of difference. Any player today who is in line to play in the world cup would also not be fully commited. It does show what can happen though when a team is up for it like Burnley ( for pride) against a far better side which doesnt put it in.

The on thing I can agree with though is " I wonder why I bother sometimes"
Douglas Higginbottom
Paul Power's Tash
 
Posts: 10685
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 10:42 pm

Re: Spurs without Gomes..

Postby Mike J » Sun May 09, 2010 11:32 pm

Vhero wrote:
Douglas Higginbottom wrote:
Vhero wrote:Spurs Just got stuffed 4-2 off Burnley without Gomes... I know its the end of the season but it was the same team that beat us minus Gomes. I honestly thought he was the reason we lost that game and today just proves he is the reason they got 4th over us as this season he has been working miracles for them. I hear he is shit on crosses but seems we couldn't catch him out last week so either he has improved on that part of his game or we are shit at crossing (today would prove the former).

Discuss..


Ok I'll bite. We didn't lose to Spurs because of Gomes but because Spurs were the better side.
Spurs didn't lose to Burnley because Gomes was missing but because they had already beaten City and didn't need the points.

Is that sufficient discussion?


You honestly think that?? You honestly think because they didn't need the points they lost on purpose?? These are fucking professional football players. what a childish fucking argument. I wonder why I bother sometimes. I thought I was posting on a board where people knew shit about footbal, l I forgot where I was posting.. Sorry I won't make that mistake again when making a topic...

people on here do, you however.......
User avatar
Mike J
Dickov's Injury Time Equaliser
 
Posts: 4852
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2006 1:48 pm
Supporter of: Who do you think
My favourite player is: Merlin

Re: Spurs without Gomes..

Postby DoomMerchant » Mon May 10, 2010 1:02 am

Mike J wrote:
Vhero wrote:
Douglas Higginbottom wrote:
Vhero wrote:Spurs Just got stuffed 4-2 off Burnley without Gomes... I know its the end of the season but it was the same team that beat us minus Gomes. I honestly thought he was the reason we lost that game and today just proves he is the reason they got 4th over us as this season he has been working miracles for them. I hear he is shit on crosses but seems we couldn't catch him out last week so either he has improved on that part of his game or we are shit at crossing (today would prove the former).

Discuss..


Ok I'll bite. We didn't lose to Spurs because of Gomes but because Spurs were the better side.
Spurs didn't lose to Burnley because Gomes was missing but because they had already beaten City and didn't need the points.

Is that sufficient discussion?


You honestly think that?? You honestly think because they didn't need the points they lost on purpose?? These are fucking professional football players. what a childish fucking argument. I wonder why I bother sometimes. I thought I was posting on a board where people knew shit about footbal, l I forgot where I was posting.. Sorry I won't make that mistake again when making a topic...

people on here do, you however.......


I want to go on record as calling that just plain old fashioned mean.

Everyone knows its the fuclin mafia that put you up to that shit. Im sure as fucl glad i don't live in a country with mafia in it.

Cheers
viVa el ciTy!

"All things considered, there's absolutely no escape from this hellish situation. I'm prepared to take the coward's way out if you are. It's reincarnation or nothing." -- Gideon Stargrave

Image
User avatar
DoomMerchant
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Pellegrini's Hoodie
 
Posts: 22332
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 6:46 pm
Location: Orlando, FL
Supporter of: MCFC. OK.
My favourite player is: The Game

Re: Spurs without Gomes..

Postby Slim » Mon May 10, 2010 2:47 am

Carlsberg don't make forum trolls.......
Image
User avatar
Slim
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 30344
Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2006 3:57 am
Location: Perth

Re: Spurs without Gomes..

Postby Vhero » Mon May 10, 2010 7:25 am

Douglas Higginbottom wrote:
Original Dub wrote:
Vhero wrote:
Douglas Higginbottom wrote:
Vhero wrote:Spurs Just got stuffed 4-2 off Burnley without Gomes... I know its the end of the season but it was the same team that beat us minus Gomes. I honestly thought he was the reason we lost that game and today just proves he is the reason they got 4th over us as this season he has been working miracles for them. I hear he is shit on crosses but seems we couldn't catch him out last week so either he has improved on that part of his game or we are shit at crossing (today would prove the former).

Discuss..


Ok I'll bite. We didn't lose to Spurs because of Gomes but because Spurs were the better side.
Spurs didn't lose to Burnley because Gomes was missing but because they had already beaten City and didn't need the points.

Is that sufficient discussion?


You honestly think that?? You honestly think because they didn't need the points they lost on purpose?? These are fucking professional football players. what a childish fucking argument. I wonder why I bother sometimes.



ah hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

meh time to move on lol



hehehe correct OD.

No Vhero sir I didn't say they lost on purpose but that they didn't need the points.There is a world of difference. Any player today who is in line to play in the world cup would also not be fully commited. It does show what can happen though when a team is up for it like Burnley ( for pride) against a far better side which doesnt put it in.

The on thing I can agree with though is " I wonder why I bother sometimes"


Ah see if you did your homework you would know different Spurs had the chance to come 3rd and above Arsenal (providing Arsenal lost) if they won. But people on here as usual avoid these fact just to have a go at me that's fine. If nobody want to actually look at the point I was trying to make that is okay. If you disagree that would be fine but people use this to take a shot and I am getting really fucking sick of the immature nature of posters on here.

Seems posters can't take the fact aswell we lost against the same team that got battered off Burnley minus Gomes well face facts we did! If you can't take that then that's your choice and if anybody is stupid enough to think they weren't fighting for those 3 points then you go and do that. I remember a few quality saves from our match that stopped us scoring that there goalie against Burnley would never have made he was pretty fucking shocking. So yeah instead of talking about football and comparing opinions take shots at me like you people always do as this is basically what people on here do now.
User avatar
Vhero
Paul Power's Tash
 
Posts: 10613
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2007 6:56 pm
Location: Manchester
Supporter of: MCFC
My favourite player is: Kinkladze

Re: Spurs without Gomes..

Postby john@staustell » Mon May 10, 2010 8:29 am

Means sod all. They went on their jollies on Thursday. Arsenal were always going to beat Fulham reserves.

Move on.
“I may be drunk, Miss, but in the morning I will be sober and you will still be ugly.”
User avatar
john@staustell
Roberto Mancini's Scarf
 
Posts: 20298
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 9:35 am
Location: St Austell
Supporter of: City

Re: Spurs without Gomes..

Postby Goaters 103 » Mon May 10, 2010 8:36 am

Think some people on here need a brief explanation as to what playing with a cigar on means. Spurs season ended in their heads at COMS and they got what they wanted. Once Ars went 3-0 up really quick they had zip to play for; if they had needed that game Gomes would have played, end of.

I echo the senitiments of Doug and Slim and do wonder about the sanity of some others on here.
Last edited by Goaters 103 on Mon May 10, 2010 9:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Goaters 103
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Joe Hart's 29 Clean Sheets
 
Posts: 5993
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 7:52 pm
Location: Manchester Born and Bred, City by the Grace of God

Re: Spurs without Gomes..

Postby Vhero » Mon May 10, 2010 8:41 am

Goaters 103 wrote:Think some people on here need a brief explanation as to what playing with a cigar on means. Spurs season ended in their heads at COMS and they got what they wanted. Once Ars went 3-0 up really quick they had zip to play for; if they had needed that game Gomes woulod have played, end of.

I echo the senitiments of Doug and Slim and do wonder about the sanity of some others on here.


Okay putting aside they didn't need the points for arguments sake that's why Gomes didn't play the rest of the side was still there strongest side. A top 4 side doesn't go from 0-2 up to 4-2 down in 45 minutes without a good reason and I was just trying to put across that reason was Gomes was missing and he is the reason they have been doing so well this season. They obviously went for it I mean they were 0-2 up at half time for christ sake! People are seeing blue here too much to see that facts and actually have a discussion.
User avatar
Vhero
Paul Power's Tash
 
Posts: 10613
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2007 6:56 pm
Location: Manchester
Supporter of: MCFC
My favourite player is: Kinkladze

Re: Spurs without Gomes..

Postby Mike J » Mon May 10, 2010 8:45 am

Vhero wrote:
Goaters 103 wrote:Think some people on here need a brief explanation as to what playing with a cigar on means. Spurs season ended in their heads at COMS and they got what they wanted. Once Ars went 3-0 up really quick they had zip to play for; if they had needed that game Gomes woulod have played, end of.

I echo the senitiments of Doug and Slim and do wonder about the sanity of some others on here.


Okay putting aside they didn't need the points for arguments sake that's why Gomes didn't play the rest of the side was still there strongest side. A top 4 side doesn't go from 0-2 up to 4-2 down in 45 minutes without a good reason and I was just trying to put across that reason was Gomes was missing and he is the reason they have been doing so well this season. They obviously went for it I mean they were 0-2 up at half time for christ sake! People are seeing blue here too much to see that facts and actually have a discussion.

it happens every fucking year on the last day of the season! spurs had achieved their ultimate objective and got CL football. do you really think they were that arsed about burnley. some of them were probably already on their holidays. it happens. get over it.

if you really think that gomes was the reason for losing to burnley then you are wrong. its a ridiculous theory.
User avatar
Mike J
Dickov's Injury Time Equaliser
 
Posts: 4852
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2006 1:48 pm
Supporter of: Who do you think
My favourite player is: Merlin

Re: Spurs without Gomes..

Postby Original Dub » Mon May 10, 2010 9:27 am

Is this thread still going?

Maybe not having Gomez was definitely the reason that Spurs lost against Burnley. I think that's a fact.
Original Dub
 

Next

Return to The Maine Football forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: salford city and 325 guests