twosips wrote:People are just fucking idiots tbh. A needless overreaction. We were rusty and slow.....IN OUR FIRST GAME OF THE SEASON.
What a fucking surprise. Get a grip people.
bluebananamilksheikh wrote:It's a fine line between success and failure.
If Nani had not scored and we had won on penalities there would be a completely different take and headline on yesterday.
i.e Despite playing badly Mega rich City still beat Fergie's inexperienced side instead of the United's wonder kids give City a lesson in football bullshit.
Just saying.
Mike J wrote:bluebananamilksheikh wrote:It's a fine line between success and failure.
If Nani had not scored and we had won on penalities there would be a completely different take and headline on yesterday.
i.e Despite playing badly Mega rich City still beat Fergie's inexperienced side instead of the United's wonder kids give City a lesson in football bullshit.
Just saying.
but nani did score, because we fucked up and they were a million times sharper than us. so [highlight]whats your point?[/highlight]
im more bemused that some didnt think it was an important game, against our arch rivals? and that they couldnt see how much better than us they were.
Ted Hughes wrote:Ahh the thought police in full force.
We were shite. Utd were fitter, faster, better organised, more motivated & their new players 'gelled' , like ours take a year to do. It was only a friendly but we're entitled to discuss it. Not many people are daft enough demanding sackings on that game. Hardly anyone who dislikes Balotelli is basing their opinion on that performance, he's been here a whole season & is yet to play any better than the players he's replacing . If he doesn't get better soon, your beloved Bob will kick him out, he's losing patience. Then your dick sucking may choke you.
If this type of discussion is unacceptable to you, why not start an ass kissing forum rather than coming on one where people discuss football ?
bluebananamilksheikh wrote:Mike J wrote:bluebananamilksheikh wrote:It's a fine line between success and failure.
If Nani had not scored and we had won on penalities there would be a completely different take and headline on yesterday.
i.e Despite playing badly Mega rich City still beat Fergie's inexperienced side instead of the United's wonder kids give City a lesson in football bullshit.
Just saying.
but nani did score, because we fucked up and they were a million times sharper than us. so [highlight]whats your point?[/highlight]
im more bemused that some didnt think it was an important game, against our arch rivals? and that they couldnt see how much better than us they were.
Point is that City were shit yesterday and I don't thick it was a meaningless game, but everyone is over reacting., now next game we lose to the Rags in the Community Shield & suddenly we are shit, the manager is fuckin useless , we need to buy half a team etc,etc.Last competitive game we beat Stoke in the FA Cup final everything was Rosy
Everybody is reacting like the Daily Mail headline writers, get a fuckin grip!!!!
Ted Hughes wrote:Ahh the thought police in full force.
We were shite. Utd were fitter, faster, better organised, more motivated & their new players 'gelled' , like ours take a year to do. It was only a friendly but we're entitled to discuss it. Not many people are daft enough demanding sackings on that game. Hardly anyone who dislikes Balotelli is basing their opinion on that performance, he's been here a whole season & is yet to play any better than the players he's replacing . If he doesn't get better soon, your beloved Bob will kick him out, he's losing patience. Then your dick sucking may choke you.
If this type of discussion is unacceptable to you, why not start an ass kissing forum rather than coming on one where people discuss football ?
Dubaimancityfan wrote:bluebananamilksheikh wrote:Mike J wrote:bluebananamilksheikh wrote:It's a fine line between success and failure.
If Nani had not scored and we had won on penalities there would be a completely different take and headline on yesterday.
i.e Despite playing badly Mega rich City still beat Fergie's inexperienced side instead of the United's wonder kids give City a lesson in football bullshit.
Just saying.
but nani did score, because we fucked up and they were a million times sharper than us. so [highlight]whats your point?[/highlight]
im more bemused that some didnt think it was an important game, against our arch rivals? and that they couldnt see how much better than us they were.
Point is that City were shit yesterday and I don't thick it was a meaningless game, but everyone is over reacting., now next game we lose to the Rags in the Community Shield & suddenly we are shit, the manager is fuckin useless , we need to buy half a team etc,etc.Last competitive game we beat Stoke in the FA Cup final everything was Rosy
Everybody is reacting like the Daily Mail headline writers, get a fuckin grip!!!!
This one match has wiped out all the good feelings we had at the end of last season.
It wasn't just that we lost (and to the Rags at that), it was how we lost. 2 goals up in the 1st half and then level after 15 minutes into the 2nd and the usual last minute winner because of a stupid fuck-up by our best defender last season and our Captain no less !
Add to that the negative tactics of Mancini' taking off a striker and bringing in Barry when we needed to score. Whatever you might say about Balo, we all know he can score any minute and out of nothing. 6 subs were allowed and Mancini only used 3 and kept Shaunie on the bench !!
As Ted said, no one is talking about getting rid of Mancini but we have the right to feel bad about what happened yesterday and not hide behind the myth that it was a pre-season friendly. The other team certainly didn't see it that way!
twosips wrote:I'm bothered, muppet. I was gutted yesterday - BUT at the same time I can be realistic about it and see the bigger picture. It seems some others can't.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot], nottsblue, trueblue64 and 141 guests