Balotelli's Attitude

[Slim]

it's "mum". never "mom".

I think you'll find it's "mam" round here

Just saying like ;)

I call mine Mam, I wouldnt fuck her though.

That's okay, plenty of men already do.

[Dubciteh]

I am absolutely positive that Diego Forlan removed his shirt and it had an inner lining that was only attached at the top. When he removed the shirt it all sort of came apart and he couldn't get it back on, so he continued playing for a couple of minutes carrying his shirt in his hand until he was ordered to the sidelines to get his shirt untangled and back on. The law came in the following season.

However I completely buy the sponsorship angle, because it's at that point that the camera is on that individual player, makes sense they'd want the sponsors being shown right then.

What about internationals where there are no sponsorship, its still a yellow card! Has to be another reason and your forlan one makes a bit of sense...

[sandman]

it's "mum". never "mom".

I think you'll find it's "mam" round here

Just saying like ;)

I call mine Mam, I wouldnt fuck her though.

That's okay, plenty of men already do.

Poor poor fellas.

Although speaking of wrong-MILFS I have always wondered what a blow job would be like if they took their teeth out, does anybody want to lend me their MOM for about half an hour please? (I dont want to use my own)

[BlueinBosnia]

I am absolutely positive that Diego Forlan removed his shirt and it had an inner lining that was only attached at the top. When he removed the shirt it all sort of came apart and he couldn't get it back on, so he continued playing for a couple of minutes carrying his shirt in his hand until he was ordered to the sidelines to get his shirt untangled and back on. The law came in the following season.

However I completely buy the sponsorship angle, because it's at that point that the camera is on that individual player, makes sense they'd want the sponsors being shown right then.

What about internationals where there are no sponsorship, its still a yellow card! Has to be another reason and your forlan one makes a bit of sense...

If they bring in a rule just for club football, then it becomes too obvious.

On a completely unrelated note, Transparency International have severed all ties with FIFA regarding the corruption scandal: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-15996806

[Mingchester Mingy]

So I should say "mum", even though Im from the states?

I think the rediculous goal celebrations like carrying a baby and shining the boots is worst than a Rooney wigplant...but going on a trot to the crowd with arms wide open , thats embracing the crowd and nothing wrong with that.

Whose mum is hot on here, I'll trow ' er' tree inches and have her back before noon !

[ronk]

I am absolutely positive that Diego Forlan removed his shirt and it had an inner lining that was only attached at the top. When he removed the shirt it all sort of came apart and he couldn't get it back on, so he continued playing for a couple of minutes carrying his shirt in his hand until he was ordered to the sidelines to get his shirt untangled and back on. The law came in the following season.

However I completely buy the sponsorship angle, because it's at that point that the camera is on that individual player, makes sense they'd want the sponsors being shown right then.

What about internationals where there are no sponsorship, its still a yellow card! Has to be another reason and your forlan one makes a bit of sense...

Snoods have been banned for safety reasons, reality is that FIFA just didn't like them.

Their marketers told them that in some emerging markets removing the shirt was seen as rude and improper, and it set a bad example for kids in those markets.

[sandman]

So I should say "mum", even though Im from the states?

Hell yes, the Friendly Fire brigade have been butchering our language for long enough, you should start a revolution!!

[Ted Hughes]

Balotelli's dismissal, after he received a second yellow card for a challenge on Martin Skrtel, was his third since joining City 16 months ago and Mancini fears he could become a target for streetwise opponents.

Mancini said: "Mario should pay attention and he should be clever.

"I can do nothing - only he is on the pitch.

"He should pay attention and think only about football and not other things.

"I think he made a mistake only for the first foul when he took the first yellow card. Then he should not take any risks."

Mancini said: "He is more mature, this is clear. But in my opinion, if Mario was on the pitch in the last 20 minutes we could have won the game.

It is important Mario understands we need him as a player on the pitch."."

Mancini seems to be implying that Mario needed to be careful that the ref didn't book him again, yet some of us who suggested this have been lampooned as idiots, people have even suggested it's impossible, yet here is Mancini clearly suggesting it is possible.

Therfore Mancini is an idiot.

[ant london]

Mancini is an idiot

And he's not English

He should fuck off back to where he came from

[Chopper]

Mancini was at fault for Balos first yellow. He should not have sent him on until his leggings were ready.

[Slim]

ELEPHANT MAN IN!

[Cocacolajojo1]

It's a shame the quotes give no clue about Mancini's body language.

[Ted Hughes]

It's a shame the quotes give no clue about Mancini's body language.

Why ?

[Alex Sapphire]

Mancini seems to be implying that Mario needed to be careful that the ref didn't book him again, yet some of us who suggested this have been lampooned as idiots, people have even suggested it's impossible, yet here is Mancini clearly suggesting it is possible.

Therfore Mancini is an idiot.

it's impossible to avoid a second yellow? which narna said that?
Thanks God you explained to us that players who've been booked should avoid getting booked again. This is advanced stuff, so Thanks
but you're wrong about Mancini. He's no idiot

[Ted Hughes]

Mancini seems to be implying that Mario needed to be careful that the ref didn't book him again, yet some of us who suggested this have been lampooned as idiots, people have even suggested it's impossible, yet here is Mancini clearly suggesting it is possible.

Therfore Mancini is an idiot.

it's impossible to avoid a second yellow? which narna said that?
Thanks God you explained to us that players who've been booked should avoid getting booked again. This is advanced stuff, so Thanks
but you're wrong about Mancini. He's no idiot

It seems to be Mancini who is explaining that & for some unknown reason you are getting snotty about it. Why is that ? Have I said something hurtful without realising it?

Some people were making out that the very idea Balotelli should tread carefully in order to avoid a second yellow was ridiculous by being sarcastic or hostile towards anyone who suggested it. Therefore, those same people should now have the same attitude towards Mancini's comments, should they not ?

[Slim]

Mancini seems to be implying that Mario needed to be careful that the ref didn't book him again, yet some of us who suggested this have been lampooned as idiots, people have even suggested it's impossible, yet here is Mancini clearly suggesting it is possible.

Therfore Mancini is an idiot.

it's impossible to avoid a second yellow? which narna said that?
Thanks God you explained to us that players who've been booked should avoid getting booked again. This is advanced stuff, so Thanks
but you're wrong about Mancini. He's no idiot

It seems to be Mancini who is explaining that & for some unknown reason you are getting snotty about it. Why is that ? Have I said something hurtful without realising it?

You mispelled "therefore".

Hurt my feelings.

Sniff.

[Ted Hughes]

Mancini seems to be implying that Mario needed to be careful that the ref didn't book him again, yet some of us who suggested this have been lampooned as idiots, people have even suggested it's impossible, yet here is Mancini clearly suggesting it is possible.

Therfore Mancini is an idiot.

it's impossible to avoid a second yellow? which narna said that?
Thanks God you explained to us that players who've been booked should avoid getting booked again. This is advanced stuff, so Thanks
but you're wrong about Mancini. He's no idiot

It seems to be Mancini who is explaining that & for some unknown reason you are getting snotty about it. Why is that ? Have I said something hurtful without realising it?

You mispelled "therefore".

Hurt my feelings.

Sniff.

Bugger.

[Arjan Van Schotte]

i hate balotelli, he's a a massive cunt.

[Kevincharrison]

<null>

Good input into the thread there.

[Kevincharrison]

Good intelligent input there!