mr_nool wrote:As a Swede, I'm gutted. I fancied our chances against an England in chaos (i.e. with Pearce or Redknapp at the helm), but I think Roy is the best available option for you right now He also knows Swedish football inside out.
Bianchi on Ice wrote:Mancio4ever wrote:Bianchi on Ice wrote:Hodgson was merely working with what benitez left him, and that was very little...I have slated benitez in the past so I would defend Hodgson on that one. England are average, but have been below those standards for a while now...Hodgson will cut his cloth accordingly...thats what international managers do...they dont have time to turn shit into gold. the press think redknapp can turn shit into gold. he cant, not without any creative players. no one can. Hodgson will make England harder to beat and might just take some steps further than of late. That is all we should be expecting, realistically. Fuck the press, let them pick holes...in time no one will care what they write.
Mate, to say England are averege is a bit rich, imo, if You'd pardon me.
particularly when in comparison to the current status of the remainder of continental opponents, apart from Spainiards.
only avarege dept is arguably the front row, where it's Shrek and very little more and it has to guess what kind of Shrek we shall see by that time.
England has finally found a world class keeper, has very decent defenders when set up properly (and here Hodgson takes great advantage fm his Italian experience) as well as good solutions to shuffle in the middle of the park along with some great young talents on the flanks, now raising to fit the international stage, imo.
England problem is and always will be the hugely demanding season they come from. as fans we do enjoy, but that on the other hand, prevent England to take the honours they deserve at international level.
I can only comment on what Ive seen of the national side over many years, Mancio...we lack creative players, one a generation comes through it seems..we lack players with big match temperaments and enough players with technique good enough to fall back on...with Hodgson we may rise above average, we may not...but I'm only commenting on what are basic facts..at the highest level, England havent been there often enough for a footballing nation of its size.
zuricity wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:
Roy understands tactics & Harry doesn't.
Harry's tactics would be to try & bullshit Gerrard, Scholes, Lampard, Terry & Ferdinand to think & play like they are 20 years old. Then when it didn't work, he'd fuck off. Roy will try to get Lampard Gerrard, Terry & Ferdinand playing a tactical game, & when it doesn't work, he'll be fired but the new bloke can finally fuck Lampard Gerrard, Terry & Ferdinand off & we can start to rebuild.
how can anyone possibly fail miserably in such a short space of time ? come off it the guy never stood a chance after the disaster that was the fat waiter and without the quick money from Boston , even king kenny would have gone by now
Grob wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:Internationl managers don't have time to do much day to day coaching etc so it's an entirely different job. Keegan's cheerleading approach failed completely & Harry would have been the same.
Agreed, although I think Harry would be inspired by leading the England team and would get passion and commitment out of the players. Tactially yes, he's a bit of a 1 trick pony, but im not sure Englands 'best' players have the brain capacity for detailed tactics.
As much as it pains me to say, I think Redkanpp would get more out of the England team than Turkey Neck.
Mikhail Chigorin wrote:For the foreseeable future, England's international prospects are pretty grim; the current first choice players are getting too old, they're not good enough technically, young players who might have been given a chance have been largely overlooked and, tactically, many/most sides are on a different planet to us, as far as we're concerned.
Perhaps Hodgson is the dose of (short term ??) reality that's needed. He's not a messianic figure, he's not someone who is a tub thumper and who will raise all the Nation's (and the media's) hopes, only to have them dashed and, because he's probably going to be seen as a low profile, relatively mundane/boring appointment, no-one is really going to expect much of him.
BUT, if he can get the side organised and to play as a proper team, tighten up the defence and make us really difficult to beat (as his past club records might suggest - the Liverpool experience notwithstanding), if he can weed out the flash boys and the fancy-dans and get everyone working their socks off, then he just might stop us from being humiliated whenever we enter a tournament and, because he will be underestimated by all and sundry, he might stop us from being the laughing stock of world football.
It's a big ask and he's never going to get us to semi-finals, or even finals, but he might just bring back a little bit of respect for the national team. If he succeeds in this, he could prove to be a shrewd appointment by the FA......
Goaters 103 wrote:Summed up best by Henry Winter of The Telegraph today - Hodgson "a Broadsheet manager in a tabloid world"
Socrates wrote:Goaters 103 wrote:Summed up best by Henry Winter of The Telegraph today - Hodgson "a Broadsheet manager in a tabloid world"
liking that quote very much
Ted Hughes wrote:Grob wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:Internationl managers don't have time to do much day to day coaching etc so it's an entirely different job. Keegan's cheerleading approach failed completely & Harry would have been the same.
Agreed, although I think Harry would be inspired by leading the England team and would get passion and commitment out of the players. Tactially yes, he's a bit of a 1 trick pony, but im not sure Englands 'best' players have the brain capacity for detailed tactics.
As much as it pains me to say, I think Redkanpp would get more out of the England team than Turkey Neck.
I think the best way for England to succeed in this tournament is to do what Greece did; play as a team, & Roy could organise that in theory. I don't think that the usual suspects are good enough anymore to do anything special but will have to be picked anyway as we've generally just dicked about for the past few years with no system, team, or style of play. Harry would just go for what he knows, which would possibly work for a few games before being destroyed by Spain or Germany, but all the tabloids would love it that we all ran forward in a headlong charge, then we'd be stuck with the wanker after the tourno, pretending he was building a team but in reality just going through the motions doing the same shit until eventually being sacked (as he will at Spurs).
Ted Hughes wrote:Is his name actually Woy ?
The bloke on Sky yesterday was calling him Woy & now Bernstein is calling him Woy.
I can only conclude, his name is Woy.
Im_Spartacus wrote:The thing is, the fa have only fucking gone and done it again.
We are a moth or so away from a major tournament. Why the fuck would we give someone a 4 year contract on the eve of a tournament that he could easily prove to be shote in, then we are stuck with someone for 4 years.
Why on earth they couldnt have made an interim appointment of hodgson, to be reviewed after the tournament is beyond me
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: ayrshireblue, city72, Google [Bot], PeterParker and 223 guests