CTID Hants wrote:
All in all though this is all part of the Sheikhs planes to make us a global brand by long term investment.
CTID Hants wrote:Having briefly read some of the posts in this thread and having looked on Wiki (yeah I know but it was convenient) I can only see this as a good thing for us.
Football is currently the third most PLAYED team sport in the US with over 13 million playing.
It will give me something to keep an eye on follow over the summer months when our season is closed.
Potentially a lot of City fans worldwide will now take an interest in NYCFC & the MLS in general, which could raise the profile of the league?
If the current academy system is pay per play i.e no college grants like in the other major US sports?
Then this means it is only open to the financially secure families & assuming that City will actually fund the players through it's new academy this should open it up to those who could not afford to progress in football.
In 2010, there were 16.4 million kids who fell into the "poor" category according to national statisitcs, that's a lot of kids to pick from IMO. I thought we had already opened a series of academies in the US over the last 4 years??
I have no idea if it will also potentially open up routes from central American countries, Caribbean, Bahamas, Canada etc etc?? (might of just said American continent), not just for kids going to academies, it also be a get round on Visa's? NYCFC buy them and loan to us with out needing a European/Uk visa? OK, so this could be stretching the potentials too far!!
Yeah yeah, we all know "women's footie" is bigger in the US, so think about the potential for Manchester City Ladies team? Having just got themselves to the Women's Super League 1, would it not benefit the whole club to exploit the connection further with FIFA's top ranked ladies country?
OK so some of you have a downer on the MLS & to be honest I haven't bothered with until now BUT I can only see benefits from this and as I said earlier it would be nice if we can use it to fuck over Platini and his bent cartel the fookin then even better.
All in all though this is all part of the Sheikhs planes to make us a global brand by long term investment.
kinkylola wrote:In retrospect, your comment about academies in USA/MLS sucking is not relevant to City and NYCFC, because City are creating something new, and they have the potential to decide how an academy will be structured.
Alioune DVToure wrote:
the US didn't 'more than hold their own' against England in 2010.
Blue Since 76 wrote:kinkylola wrote:
look ... obviously US soccer is no where near as developed as England. Congrats, we've had a serious pro league since 94-95.
But if your metric for a successful program is that England put us under intense pressure and "should have" won, then I don't think you're having the right conversation.
The USA is no powerhouse, we have a horrible youth system, mediocre league at best and as you say only around 30 players that could/would/do make a difference in the prem. Still, we can hang with the big boys.
I wouldn't get all high and mighty about England's "PL quality players" ... after all, I'd take quite a few off the US squad depth chart before calling up Danny Welbeck, and your last competitive result was 1 - 1 Montengro.
Now, I can imagine City coming in and developing something really special that will be good for City ... and it will be good for US talent development in general. Exciting times.
You also have 300 million people compared to about 50 million, so would stand a chance if kids took it seriously. That said, China and India could be the best if they did.
England as a team are pretty poor and that's got less to do with the academies and more to do with what happens to kids up to 11. The academies are starting to produce some good players, but a lot aren't English - just look at City's.
English football is in a state because the FA preferred to spend £800m on a shiny stadium on an industrial estate than give the money to youth teams so that they could play on grass rather than boggy marshes covered in dog shit.
Blue Since 76 wrote:CTID Hants wrote:
All in all though this is all part of the Sheikhs planes to make us a global brand by long term investment.
Not sure Sheikhs, planes and New York are a good mix...
Personally think this can only be good for City long term. I understand the complaints about the Yankees from those with a interest in American sports (wore a Yankees baseball cap on a trip to Florida a couple of years ago which I'd bought in Tesco's here - some American asked me about it, at which point I felt like a Malaysian rag). However they seem to be the right partners for raising the profile and allowing things to work in NY.
I can't believe football's not bigger in the US than it is due to the number of recent immigrants in a lot of states from either Europe or Central America where football is a big deal. It seems to have been the college and draft system which has affected it, plus the lack of money as an MLS player, as oppose to what you could earn here as a lower league player or there in netball, rounders and rugby (or whatever they call them).
With 13 million kids playing it, I think I saw, we only need to convince a small percentage to want a City shirt to start increasing our revenue (whatever Soriano claimed yesterday).
kinkylola wrote:
But we did beat spain 2-0 in the confed cup (same team who went on to win the WC 2010), that might count as holding our own against a big team. We also ran brazil close in the final, falling apart in the second half after leading 3-2 ... again, holding our own.
Anyway, that's all off on a huge tangent now.
I feel really good about having reyna involved at NYCFC, great to have him back working with the club in a way.
Boom! Get in! [url="http://majorleaguesoccertalk.com/files/2008/07/39468084_reynagoal_get.jpg"]http://majorleaguesoccertalk.com/files/2008/07/39468084_reynagoal_get.jpg[/url]
Exiled wrote:Being the owner of Colorado Rapids, I suspect that Stan Kroenke is watching all this eagerly.
Beefymcfc wrote:Has anybody mentioned that we've curtailed Beckhams dreams of owning a MLS side?
Alioune DVToure wrote:Beefymcfc wrote:Has anybody mentioned that we've curtailed Beckhams dreams of owning a MLS side?
Apparently the agreement he has in place excludes NYC.
Alioune DVToure wrote:Beefymcfc wrote:Has anybody mentioned that we've curtailed Beckhams dreams of owning a MLS side?
Apparently the agreement he has in place excludes NYC.
Ted Hughes wrote:
He can get on the sunbed, have his teeth extra whitened & start his own religion now, & get a PPV channel going, where he can accept donations & heal people of various ailments, with the help of his 'lovely wife'...
Alioune DVToure wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:
He can get on the sunbed, have his teeth extra whitened & start his own religion now, & get a PPV channel going, where he can accept donations & heal people of various ailments, with the help of his 'lovely wife'...
It'd be quality if all the unusual 'religions' in America each set up a team: The Scientologist Thetans, The Latterday Saints and The Christian Scientists. I suppose the Mormon and CS games would be boring to go to, though, with no stimulants being allowed. You could also have a Jehovahs' team with a physio who refuses to treat injured players.
Alioune DVToure wrote:
It'd be quality if all the unusual 'religions' in America each set up a team: The Scientologist Thetans, The Latterday Saints and The Christian Scientists. I suppose the Mormon and CS games would be boring to go to, though, with no stimulants being allowed. You could also have a Jehovahs' team with a physio who refuses to treat injured players.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Bluemoon4610, blues2win, Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot], Nigels Tackle, salford city and 83 guests