Slim wrote:
6/5, we're still favourites@2/7 but they've come in from 11/4.
Piccsnumberoneblue wrote:Slim wrote:
6/5, we're still favourites@2/7 but they've come in from 11/4.
So do you think the bookies are leading the press or the press reports making the bookies more cautious?
Piccsnumberoneblue wrote:Slim wrote:
6/5, we're still favourites@2/7 but they've come in from 11/4.
So do you think the bookies are leading the press or the press reports making the bookies more cautious?
Herb wrote:
The media drive the betting and the betting drives the odds - the bookies don't give a shit where he goes they just make sure that they take their rake whatever the outcome.
So just accept that the bookies odds reflect the betting and the betting reflects public opinion and that's driven by the media so the odds mean fuck all and you can take no comfort even if you're odds on.
carl_feedthegoat wrote:Discussing the Isco, David Silva, and Jesus Navas axis at Manchester City
It seems that Isco has rejected the opportunity to join Real Madrid, and will soon become a Manchester City player. While that’s not terrific news for the other clubs in the Premier League, it would be a huge signing for the division as a whole.
For the sake of argument, let’s assume that this is happening, and focus on what kind of impact Isco will have at the Etihad Stadium.
As discussed previously, Manuel Pellegrini favours the below formation, and will almost certainly set his attacking-midfield out as per the graphic.
I talk a lot on this side about the importance of attacking fluidity, and the value of having interchangeable players in advanced positions.
What City now have, heading into next season, are three players who can change positions at will, and who all carry an equal but varied threat to the opposition. Jesus Navas is far less comfortable in central areas than the other two, but he still has the attributes to create big issues for defenders in that part of the pitch – pace, great control, good final-ball.
By and large, defending in the Premier League is about stopping certain players whilst maintaining a shape – preventing the creative, ball-playing types from influencing a game, but without becoming vulnerable elsewhere. Last season, when a side faced Roberto Mancini’s Manchester City, their main priority would have been to prevent David Silva from becoming isolated with a single defender – hassle him, take away his space, and an opponent had a good chance of blunting City’s attacking progress.
Now though, how does a team match-up with a side who, realistically, have three players who need to be in double-coverage at all times? And, significantly, that’s without even factoring-in Sergio Aguero.
At this stage of the Summer, although admittedly with plenty of transfer movement still to come, there isn’t a side in the Premier League who have sufficient defensive strength to deal with that.
carl_feedthegoat wrote:Discussing the Isco, David Silva, and Jesus Navas axis at Manchester City
It seems that Isco has rejected the opportunity to join Real Madrid, and will soon become a Manchester City player. While that’s not terrific news for the other clubs in the Premier League, it would be a huge signing for the division as a whole.
For the sake of argument, let’s assume that this is happening, and focus on what kind of impact Isco will have at the Etihad Stadium.
As discussed previously, Manuel Pellegrini favours the below formation, and will almost certainly set his attacking-midfield out as per the graphic.
I talk a lot on this side about the importance of attacking fluidity, and the value of having interchangeable players in advanced positions.
What City now have, heading into next season, are three players who can change positions at will, and who all carry an equal but varied threat to the opposition. Jesus Navas is far less comfortable in central areas than the other two, but he still has the attributes to create big issues for defenders in that part of the pitch – pace, great control, good final-ball.
By and large, defending in the Premier League is about stopping certain players whilst maintaining a shape – preventing the creative, ball-playing types from influencing a game, but without becoming vulnerable elsewhere. Last season, when a side faced Roberto Mancini’s Manchester City, their main priority would have been to prevent David Silva from becoming isolated with a single defender – hassle him, take away his space, and an opponent had a good chance of blunting City’s attacking progress.
Now though, how does a team match-up with a side who, realistically, have three players who need to be in double-coverage at all times? And, significantly, that’s without even factoring-in Sergio Aguero.
At this stage of the Summer, although admittedly with plenty of transfer movement still to come, there isn’t a side in the Premier League who have sufficient defensive strength to deal with that.
DoomMerchant wrote:Herb wrote:
The media drive the betting and the betting drives the odds - the bookies don't give a shit where he goes they just make sure that they take their rake whatever the outcome.
So just accept that the bookies odds reflect the betting and the betting reflects public opinion and that's driven by the media so the odds mean fuck all and you can take no comfort even if you're odds on.
Herbalicious. As usual.
Herb wrote:
And there I was thinking that you'd be grateful for some prose that sat sweet with your favoured negative slant.
Huh. . . No pleasing some people!
Piccsnumberoneblue wrote:
Often the bookies get wind of stuff, but I don't think they know anymore than us at the mo.
Saul Goodman wrote:Holy shit. Twitter is ablaze with news saying Isco signed for RM for 30m euros. I know it's twitter but I'm bummed
Patrick wrote:I know fuckall... But I think this deal was done months ago
Now, if you will excuse me I have a speaking engagement at the WI
OliverHardy wrote:Graham hunter saying some interesting things on twitter. https://mobile.twitter.com/BumperGraham
But odds are concerning
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: C & C, Indianablue, Majestic-12 [Bot], stupot and 138 guests