do we really need 4 strikers?

Here is the place to talk about all things city and football!

Re: do we really need 4 strikers?

Postby freshie » Thu Nov 28, 2013 11:35 pm

Slim wrote: Funny considering the source of that question. I guess I'm just impressed you were able to spell "IQ".


:)
User avatar
freshie
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Rosler's Grandad Bombed The Swamp
 
Posts: 3800
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2011 7:38 pm
Supporter of: MCFC
My favourite player is: David Silva

Re: do we really need 4 strikers?

Postby Beefymcfc » Fri Nov 29, 2013 12:02 am

Nope, 4 doesn't ever work, lucky we've only got 3.

The 3rd is Dzeko and we've seen that he's already away.
In the words of my Old Man, "Life will never be the same without Man City, so get it in while you can".

The Future's Bright, The Future's Blue!!!
User avatar
Beefymcfc
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 46711
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 7:14 am
Supporter of: The Mighty Blues

Re: do we really need 4 strikers?

Postby Pretty Boy Lee » Fri Nov 29, 2013 2:30 am

Depends how you look at it? Do you want jovetic gone? If not and it's Dzeko you want gone does that mean Aguero and negrado play every game? Do they rotate and deny us the partnership?
Pretty Boy Lee
Pablo Zabaleta's Manc Accent
 
Posts: 13379
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 1:22 am
Location: Brisbane baby!
Supporter of: City!
My favourite player is: Yaya

Re: do we really need 4 strikers?

Postby Wooders » Fri Nov 29, 2013 8:01 am

I have to say that i think its time for dzeko to go, as i would rather his spot was there for guidetti or someone who is up and coming from the youth squad - we cant harp on about all this elite development then never play 'em
Wooders
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Yaya's Wembley Winning Strikes
 
Posts: 15697
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: UK
Supporter of: City

Re: do we really need 4 strikers?

Postby clawbaggio » Sat Nov 30, 2013 8:47 pm

Breks wrote:
Your a prick and you just talk constant shit. Your an absolute chopper!


Ha ha. Chopper. I haven't heard that term for ages!

Re 4 strikers, don't think we need 4 "big name" strikers. I would be happy for Dzeko to fuck off and Guidetti to be the 4th.
Then again, if we could swap him for Lewandowski . . . . . . .
clawbaggio
Robinho's Step Over
 
Posts: 297
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2012 8:26 pm
Supporter of: man city
My favourite player is: aguerro

Re: do we really need 4 strikers?

Postby Slim » Sat Nov 30, 2013 8:59 pm

clawbaggio wrote:
Breks wrote:
Your a prick and you just talk constant shit. Your an absolute chopper!


Ha ha. Chopper. I haven't heard that term for ages!

Re 4 strikers, don't think we need 4 "big name" strikers. I would be happy for Dzeko to fuck off and Guidetti to be the 4th.
Then again, if we could swap him for Lewandowski . . . . . . .


Lewandowski's contract is up in the summer.
Image
User avatar
Slim
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 30344
Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2006 3:57 am
Location: Perth

Re: do we really need 4 strikers?

Postby MilnersJaw » Sat Nov 30, 2013 9:39 pm

Slim wrote:
Funny considering the source of that question.

I guess I'm just impressed you were able to spell "IQ".


Someone's butthurt
User avatar
MilnersJaw
Kinky's Mazy Dribbles
 
Posts: 2229
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2012 4:59 pm
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: Silver

Re: do we really need 4 strikers?

Postby zuricity » Sat Nov 30, 2013 9:48 pm

Slim wrote:
Lewandowski's contract is up in the summer.


Missed a sitter today !
zuricity
Allison's Big Fat Cigar
 
Posts: 18391
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 10:54 pm
Location: Zuerich,ch

Re: do we really need 4 strikers?

Postby Slim » Sat Nov 30, 2013 11:26 pm

MilnersJaw wrote:
Slim wrote:
Funny considering the source of that question.

I guess I'm just impressed you were able to spell "IQ".


Someone's butthurt


Errr, okay.

Maybe get your boyfriend's dick out of it then.

I had to look it up to find out what that meant, are you sure you know what it means? Or IQ for that matter?
Image
User avatar
Slim
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 30344
Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2006 3:57 am
Location: Perth

Re: do we really need 4 strikers?

Postby MilnersJaw » Sun Dec 01, 2013 4:42 pm

Slim wrote:
Errr, okay.

Maybe get your boyfriend's dick out of it then.

I had to look it up to find out what that meant, are you sure you know what it means? Or IQ for that matter?


It was quite self explanatory in saying you were upset. Your jimmies been rustled.
User avatar
MilnersJaw
Kinky's Mazy Dribbles
 
Posts: 2229
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2012 4:59 pm
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: Silver

Re: do we really need 4 strikers?

Postby Slim » Sun Dec 01, 2013 4:45 pm

MilnersJaw wrote:
Slim wrote:
Errr, okay.

Maybe get your boyfriend's dick out of it then.

I had to look it up to find out what that meant, are you sure you know what it means? Or IQ for that matter?


It was quite self explanatory in saying you were upset. Your jimmies been rustled.


And you think that was me upset?

Oh sunshine, you are the downy kid of this forum, nothing you can do would upset me.
Image
User avatar
Slim
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 30344
Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2006 3:57 am
Location: Perth

Re: do we really need 4 strikers?

Postby MilnersJaw » Sun Dec 01, 2013 4:47 pm

Slim wrote:
And you think that was me upset?

Oh sunshine, you are the downy kid of this forum, nothing you can do would upset me.


Enough for you to carry on over a joke :p
User avatar
MilnersJaw
Kinky's Mazy Dribbles
 
Posts: 2229
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2012 4:59 pm
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: Silver

Re: do we really need 4 strikers?

Postby Slim » Sun Dec 01, 2013 4:47 pm

MilnersJaw wrote:
Slim wrote:
And you think that was me upset?

Oh sunshine, you are the downy kid of this forum, nothing you can do would upset me.


Enough for you to carry on over a joke :p


And now I don't think you know what the word "joke" means.
Image
User avatar
Slim
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 30344
Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2006 3:57 am
Location: Perth

Re: do we really need 4 strikers?

Postby MilnersJaw » Sun Dec 01, 2013 4:56 pm

Slim wrote:
And now I don't think you know what the word "joke" means.


You said next question so I asked one. You've carried on like a bellend over nothing. Riveting stuff, let's do it again.
User avatar
MilnersJaw
Kinky's Mazy Dribbles
 
Posts: 2229
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2012 4:59 pm
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: Silver

Re: do we really need 4 strikers?

Postby Slim » Sun Dec 01, 2013 5:03 pm

MilnersJaw wrote:
Slim wrote:
And now I don't think you know what the word "joke" means.


You said next question so I asked one. You've carried on like a bellend over nothing. Riveting stuff, let's do it again.


Riveting? STOP USING WORDS YOU DON'T KNOW THE MEANING OF.

Bellend I'll give you though, I am sure you've heard that enough in your life to know the meaning.
Image
User avatar
Slim
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 30344
Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2006 3:57 am
Location: Perth

Re: do we really need 4 strikers?

Postby Niall Quinns Discopants » Sun Dec 01, 2013 5:22 pm

Dzeko is EASILY the most randomly hated player since Richard Edghill. Maybe not the most skillfull guy but his goals per minute ratio is outstanding and he has scored tons of super important goals for us. Bit like The Goat really.
Sometimes we're good and sometimes we're bad but when we're good, at least we're much better than we used to be and when we are bad we're just as bad as we always used to be, so that's got to be good hasn't it?


Mark Radcliffe
User avatar
Niall Quinns Discopants
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 40255
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 1:19 pm
Location: Deep in the pimp game
Supporter of: Holistic approach
My favourite player is: Bishop Magic Don Juan

Re: do we really need 4 strikers?

Postby Im_Spartacus » Sun Dec 01, 2013 8:14 pm

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:Dzeko is EASILY the most randomly hated player since Richard Edghill. Maybe not the most skillfull guy but his goals per minute ratio is outstanding and he has scored tons of super important goals for us. Bit like The Goat really.


I think that's exactly it, he is just a good Shaun goater. Although on his day he can be as bad as Leonard was on his worst.
Im_Spartacus
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Denis Law's Backheel
 
Posts: 9575
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 8:41 pm
Location: Abu Dhabi
Supporter of: .

Re: do we really need 4 strikers?

Postby bobby brows » Sun Dec 01, 2013 8:43 pm

What if two strikers get injured?
User avatar
bobby brows
Kinky's Mazy Dribbles
 
Posts: 2659
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 8:26 pm
Location: chorlton!
Supporter of: City
My favourite player is: Silva

Re: do we really need 4 strikers?

Postby Pretty Boy Lee » Sun Dec 01, 2013 8:46 pm

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:Dzeko is EASILY the most randomly hated player since Richard Edghill. Maybe not the most skillfull guy but his goals per minute ratio is outstanding and he has scored tons of super important goals for us. Bit like The Goat really.


Not really random though is it? Goatee even said in his book that he figured out he was being booed because city fans saw a lack of effort. He then upped his work rate, combine that with his goals and he was a cult hero.


Nobody stopping Dzeko breaking into a light jog once in a while.
Pretty Boy Lee
Pablo Zabaleta's Manc Accent
 
Posts: 13379
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 1:22 am
Location: Brisbane baby!
Supporter of: City!
My favourite player is: Yaya

Re: do we really need 4 strikers?

Postby nottsblue » Sun Dec 01, 2013 10:15 pm

We don't NEED four strikers.
The fact we're loaded and WANT four strikers is more the point
nottsblue
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 32461
Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 5:17 pm
Location: Nottingham
Supporter of: manchester city
My favourite player is: niall Quinn & Kun

PreviousNext

Return to The Maine Football forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: city72, Google [Bot], Mase, salford city, Two's Kompany and 176 guests