john@staustell wrote:Crisis update:
"I stated at the start of the season Glazers would take never winning another trophy if it ment revenue increased by 5-10% per year and got a load of thumbs down saying we need to win for profits to increase. Now what did Ed come out and say in the last 24 hours? Time to get worried..............Direct quotes from Ed Woodward If you fight hard and just fail, people will still watch you on television, still turn up and buy shirts. There's still a lot of affinity with the club and interest. The reality is that you can't always win. Take Liverpool. They still sell an incredible number of shirts and have the second biggest shirt deal in the Premier League. They have one of the biggest technical partner deals - and they haven't won the league since 1990. And you can put the last bit underlined and in capitals. If we have a bad year we have the financial strength to change the team. We have so much deeper financial strength that instead of selling three players and buying three, we can do five. Make of it what you want to. Leeches the lot of them"
That's the crux of the matter to me.......they are looking for every possible way to reduce what they have to spend on the club, and the only barrier to that was ferguson. I'm almost certain that Ferguson leaving was largely down to an understanding that the squad was dropping to a level which couldn't compete at the top any more, and that he wasn't prepared to accept £20m/30m per season to maintain that status so walked.
If you ignore the fact that we hate the cunts, it's obvious to a blind man on a galloping horse what the glazers have been upto since day 1, and they got away with it because of Ferguson's ability. Even the £60/70m spree on younger players was a tactical ploy to save money in the long run, and now that they have Smalling, jones de yea etc, I reckon they fully intend to stick with them until either they come good, or they will fail trying.
If you weigh up the benefits of winning the league financially, it makes complete sense that they wouldn't want to spend their sky budget trying to compete, just for the sake of an extra £10m (if that) in prize money. Same really goes for the champs league. If they bring in another £30m per year, why bother to spend £30m extra on players if they can just hover around the top 6, qualify some years, Europa other years, if they don't see a return on investment in the playing squad.
Put yourself in the glazers shoes and adopt a business mentality, and why on earth would you spend money if there was no sound business case for doing so - as Liverpool proved so well, they have kept the majority of their fans, and gained new ones just by being involved every now and again since their heyday, but have blown hundreds of millions on shit player acquisition strategies..........if that's not a case for financial prudence, and not being all that arsed about competing, I don't know what is.