Entertainment vs Results

Here is the place to talk about all things city and football!

Entertainment or Results?

I want to be entertained first and foremost
33
61%
It's results business, who cares about step overs and quality of passing when you are lifting trophies?
21
39%
 
Total votes : 54

Re: Entertainment vs Results

Postby Beefymcfc » Tue Dec 24, 2013 4:59 pm

Bridge'srightfoot wrote:
Beefymcfc wrote:Are we still saying that if we lost a load of games by 5 goals to 4 which left us near the bottom of the table then we'd be happy with the entertainment?
I'd be happier seeing my team give everything and end up losing 5-4 then playing negative, anti football, boring shit, going for a point like a relegation threatened team.

So, hypothetically, you'd rather see us lose entertaining and not be in with a realistic chance of silverware, possible relegation even, rather than be challenging for something, with the squad we have got?

And before you say 'But that's a loaded question', I am in niether camp, I want us to win entertaining, they are not mutually exclusive, but would still take a scrappy win, regardless of performance, if it meant we were still challenging.
In the words of my Old Man, "Life will never be the same without Man City, so get it in while you can".

The Future's Bright, The Future's Blue!!!
User avatar
Beefymcfc
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 46711
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 7:14 am
Supporter of: The Mighty Blues

Re: Entertainment vs Results

Postby Hutch's Shoulder » Tue Dec 24, 2013 5:07 pm

I think there is a difference between being defensive, dull, scrappy etc on occasions due to injuries, quality of the opposition , state of the competition at that time etc, which probably everyone would accept, and that being the only approach under all circumstances. It's the latter which would make the game not worth watching, and the number of managers who are sacked because of their 'style of play' seems to back this up (although admittedly that is often a euphemism amongst Chairmen!).
User avatar
Hutch's Shoulder
Dickov's Injury Time Equaliser
 
Posts: 4424
Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2013 10:55 am
Location: Wild country near Glossop
Supporter of: City of course
My favourite player is: David Silva

Re: Entertainment vs Results

Postby Bridge'srightfoot » Tue Dec 24, 2013 5:24 pm

Beefymcfc wrote:
Bridge'srightfoot wrote:
Beefymcfc wrote:Are we still saying that if we lost a load of games by 5 goals to 4 which left us near the bottom of the table then we'd be happy with the entertainment?
I'd be happier seeing my team give everything and end up losing 5-4 then playing negative, anti football, boring shit, going for a point like a relegation threatened team.

So, hypothetically, you'd rather see us lose entertaining and not be in with a realistic chance of silverware, possible relegation even, rather than be challenging for something, with the squad we have got?

And before you say 'But that's a loaded question', I am in niether camp, I want us to win entertaining, they are not mutually exclusive, but would still take a scrappy win, regardless of performance, if it meant we were still challenging.

I'd lose faith in football honestly and question watching it.
I can take the odd, crappy scraped win. But if that's the approach every week then that's it for me.
When we were shite and had little money, I would take a win anyway it came because we didn't have the quality of players to play great football. But now we've spent hundreds of millions on some of the best players, coaches and facilities in the world, we have a right to demand good football.

If we started to play like Tony Pulis's Stoke or Sam Allardyce's Bolton, with the resources we have at our disposal, and reverted to long ball, set piece tactics, I would quickly stop watching altogether, even if we won most games 1-0. It's not how football should be played.
Bridge'srightfoot
Rosler's Grandad Bombed The Swamp
 
Posts: 3996
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2010 9:49 pm
Supporter of: City

Re: Entertainment vs Results

Postby Beefymcfc » Tue Dec 24, 2013 5:53 pm

Bridge'srightfoot wrote:
Beefymcfc wrote:
Bridge'srightfoot wrote:
Beefymcfc wrote:Are we still saying that if we lost a load of games by 5 goals to 4 which left us near the bottom of the table then we'd be happy with the entertainment?
I'd be happier seeing my team give everything and end up losing 5-4 then playing negative, anti football, boring shit, going for a point like a relegation threatened team.

So, hypothetically, you'd rather see us lose entertaining and not be in with a realistic chance of silverware, possible relegation even, rather than be challenging for something, with the squad we have got?

And before you say 'But that's a loaded question', I am in niether camp, I want us to win entertaining, they are not mutually exclusive, but would still take a scrappy win, regardless of performance, if it meant we were still challenging.

I'd lose faith in football honestly and question watching it.
I can take the odd, crappy scraped win. But if that's the approach every week then that's it for me.
When we were shite and had little money, I would take a win anyway it came because we didn't have the quality of players to play great football. But now we've spent hundreds of millions on some of the best players, coaches and facilities in the world, we have a right to demand good football.

If we started to play like Tony Pulis's Stoke or Sam Allardyce's Bolton, with the resources we have at our disposal, and reverted to long ball, set piece tactics, I would quickly stop watching altogether, even if we won most games 1-0. It's not how football should be played.

Luckily we don't have to play one way or the other and since the takeover, and before for that matter (except under Pearce, yuk), we've had decet football going on. Some has been cut and thrust, some has been very technical but on the whole we've been blessed with some fantastic football leading to a couple of pieces of silverware and a future that is looking very bright.

Playing fantastic football is great, especially when you're winning, but sometimes a result is all that is needed. If these are the things we are now discussing as City fans then we haven't got too much to whinge at really.

It's all good ;-)
In the words of my Old Man, "Life will never be the same without Man City, so get it in while you can".

The Future's Bright, The Future's Blue!!!
User avatar
Beefymcfc
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 46711
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 7:14 am
Supporter of: The Mighty Blues

Re: Entertainment vs Results

Postby Wonderwall » Tue Dec 24, 2013 6:06 pm

Bridge'srightfoot wrote:I'd be happier seeing my team give everything and end up losing 5-4 then playing negative, anti football, boring shit, going for a point like a relegation threatened team.


We lost 5-4 against chelsea once... maureen wasnt in charge though
User avatar
Wonderwall
Colin Bell's Football Brain
 
Posts: 28928
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 2:58 pm
Location: Sale
Supporter of: Gods own team

Re: Entertainment vs Results

Postby DoomMerchant » Tue Dec 24, 2013 8:13 pm

Beefymcfc wrote:That wasn't entertainment or a result, it was 2 shit-house wankers agreeing to a score.


Agreed. A fucking peace accord. Complete horseshit. Hate it. Wenger needed to rock out with his cock out and he didn't even get a boner ffs. Try!!! you surrender monkey cunt.
User avatar
DoomMerchant
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Pellegrini's Hoodie
 
Posts: 22332
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 6:46 pm
Location: Orlando, FL
Supporter of: MCFC. OK.
My favourite player is: The Game

Re: Entertainment vs Results

Postby dazby » Wed Dec 25, 2013 7:11 am

I have to say, the 4-3 derby loss a couple of years ago is still one of my favourite games of all time. That was pure entertainment.
User avatar
dazby
Joe Mercer's OBE
 
Posts: 19308
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 4:02 am
Location: Brisbane Australia
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: Ed

Re: Entertainment vs Results

Postby Douglas Higginbottom » Wed Dec 25, 2013 9:04 am

dazby wrote:I have to say, the 4-3 derby loss a couple of years ago is still one of my favourite games of all time. That was pure entertainment.



Not in my top 1000.There is no way a defeat at the swamp can be a good memory in any way.
Douglas Higginbottom
Paul Power's Tash
 
Posts: 10685
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 10:42 pm

Re: Entertainment vs Results

Postby nottsblue » Wed Dec 25, 2013 10:45 am

Douglas Higginbottom wrote:
Not in my top 1000.There is no way a defeat at the swamp can be a good memory in any way.


Think this might have been one of the occasions a shitty 1-0 in a dour uneventful match is preferable to a high scoring entertaining defeat. Was gutted when the little turd scored. Would have been well happy with a win however dull
nottsblue
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 32462
Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 5:17 pm
Location: Nottingham
Supporter of: manchester city
My favourite player is: niall Quinn & Kun

Re: Entertainment vs Results

Postby Bridge'srightfoot » Wed Dec 25, 2013 2:12 pm

Douglas Higginbottom wrote:
dazby wrote:I have to say, the 4-3 derby loss a couple of years ago is still one of my favourite games of all time. That was pure entertainment.



Not in my top 1000.There is no way a defeat at the swamp can be a good memory in any way.

The 0-0 at home the following season was far worse imo. I don't think I've ever left a derby so disappointed, watching us sit back, play with ten men behind the ball and go for a point at home against the Rags, seeing our players so fearful of the opposition and barely venturing out our own half.

Annoyed I remembered that now, makes the Arsenal vs Chelsea game look like a classic in comparison.
Last edited by Bridge'srightfoot on Wed Dec 25, 2013 5:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Bridge'srightfoot
Rosler's Grandad Bombed The Swamp
 
Posts: 3996
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2010 9:49 pm
Supporter of: City

Re: Entertainment vs Results

Postby Slim » Wed Dec 25, 2013 4:53 pm

Wonderwall wrote:
Bridge'srightfoot wrote:I'd be happier seeing my team give everything and end up losing 5-4 then playing negative, anti football, boring shit, going for a point like a relegation threatened team.


We lost 5-4 against chelsea once... maureen wasnt in charge though


1985 full members cup?
Image
User avatar
Slim
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 30344
Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2006 3:57 am
Location: Perth

Re: Entertainment vs Results

Postby Niall Quinns Discopants » Fri Dec 27, 2013 6:06 am

dazby wrote:I have to say, the 4-3 derby loss a couple of years ago is still one of my favourite games of all time. That was pure entertainment.


That's what I mean. That was one of THE most horrible moments ever when their winner went in. Absolutely devastating. And that wasn't even skillfull football but horrible defensive mistake after horrible defensive mistake. I can understand some neutrals enjoying that but... well like I said, people enjoy their football and City from different perspectives.

Yesterday was fine example of other end of the scope. We were far from amazing but grinded a result in the end and what a feeling after that final whistle!
Sometimes we're good and sometimes we're bad but when we're good, at least we're much better than we used to be and when we are bad we're just as bad as we always used to be, so that's got to be good hasn't it?


Mark Radcliffe
User avatar
Niall Quinns Discopants
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 40255
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 1:19 pm
Location: Deep in the pimp game
Supporter of: Holistic approach
My favourite player is: Bishop Magic Don Juan

Re: Entertainment vs Results

Postby Ted Hughes » Fri Dec 27, 2013 11:27 am

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:
dazby wrote:I have to say, the 4-3 derby loss a couple of years ago is still one of my favourite games of all time. That was pure entertainment.


That's what I mean. That was one of THE most horrible moments ever when their winner went in. Absolutely devastating. And that wasn't even skillfull football but horrible defensive mistake after horrible defensive mistake. I can understand some neutrals enjoying that but... well like I said, people enjoy their football and City from different perspectives.

Yesterday was fine example of other end of the scope. We were far from amazing but grinded a result in the end and what a feeling after that final whistle!


Yesterday was indeed the kind of day when it matters little whether it's a good game or not, just a win is all that is required.
As it happened, it was a good game anyway, but the result was all.

There is however, no need to have many games like that out of each 50 or so we play; just a few need to be 'result' games. We have the resources to play most games generating great entertainment & so we should aspire to imo.

It is already having a big effect on the way we are perceived as a club.
The pissartist formerly known as Ted

VIVA EL CITY !!!

Some take the bible for what it's worth.. when they say that the rags shall inherit the Earth...
Well I heard that the Sheikh... bought Carlos Tevez this week...& you fuckers aint gettin' nothin..
Ted Hughes
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Colin Bell's Football Brain
 
Posts: 28488
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 4:28 pm
Supporter of: Bill Turnbull
My favourite player is: Bill Turnbull

Re: Entertainment vs Results

Postby Wonderwall » Fri Dec 27, 2013 2:02 pm

Slim wrote:
1985 full members cup?


Yup. 5-1 down and a brilliant revival with the ref blowing the whistle early to stop.us scoring again.. they have been against us since time began.
User avatar
Wonderwall
Colin Bell's Football Brain
 
Posts: 28928
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 2:58 pm
Location: Sale
Supporter of: Gods own team

Re: Entertainment vs Results

Postby s1ty m » Fri Dec 27, 2013 2:18 pm

Douglas Higginbottom wrote: Not in my top 1000.There is no way a defeat at the swamp can be a good memory in any way.


Me neither.
User avatar
s1ty m
David Silva's Silky Skills
 
Posts: 6301
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 1:44 pm
Location: uk

Re: Entertainment vs Results

Postby Bridge'srightfoot » Fri Dec 27, 2013 3:03 pm

Absolute entertainment yesterday. Two teams going for it, playing great attacking football mixed in with moments of sheer quality from both sides. End to end stuff, really sweating at the end. Give me that over a boring 1-0 mundane Mourinho win every time. If you can't enjoy a game like that then your perceptions of football are wrong. Other than the hull game, every home game has been really entertaining so far.
Last edited by Bridge'srightfoot on Fri Dec 27, 2013 5:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Bridge'srightfoot
Rosler's Grandad Bombed The Swamp
 
Posts: 3996
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2010 9:49 pm
Supporter of: City

Re: Entertainment vs Results

Postby Mikhail Chigorin » Fri Dec 27, 2013 4:50 pm

Bridge'srightfoot wrote:Absolute entertainment yesterday. Two teams going for it, playing great attacking football mixed in with moments of sheer quality from both sides. End to end stuff, really sweating at the end. Give me that over a boring 1-0 mundane mourinho win every time. If you can't enjoy a game like that then your perceptions of football are wrong. Other than the hull game, every home game has been really entertaining so far.


Exactly this.

There's a saying that victory is all the sweeter for being hard-won and yesterday's game fell into that category.

Terrific stuff and just as good for any neutrals who might have been watching.
Mikhail Chigorin
Shaun Goater's 103 Goals
 
Posts: 7933
Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2010 5:37 pm
Location: Lost in the variations of the King's Gambit
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: Bert Trautmann

Re: Entertainment vs Results

Postby Hutch's Shoulder » Fri Dec 27, 2013 5:01 pm

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote: Yesterday was fine example of other end of the scope. We were far from amazing but grinded a result in the end and what a feeling after that final whistle!


I wouldn't say we ground out out a result yesterday; we had some great moves during the game. We did though close it out effectively during the second half. Nevertheless, I would put yesterday in the entertainment camp.
User avatar
Hutch's Shoulder
Dickov's Injury Time Equaliser
 
Posts: 4424
Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2013 10:55 am
Location: Wild country near Glossop
Supporter of: City of course
My favourite player is: David Silva

Re: Entertainment vs Results

Postby Original Dub » Sat Dec 28, 2013 5:18 pm

Hutch's Shoulder wrote:
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote: Yesterday was fine example of other end of the scope. We were far from amazing but grinded a result in the end and what a feeling after that final whistle!


I wouldn't say we ground out out a result yesterday; we had some great moves during the game. We did though close it out effectively during the second half. Nevertheless, I would put yesterday in the entertainment camp.


It doesn't much more entertaining than the Liverpool game.

Today... a bit closer to a grind out alright.
Original Dub
 

Re: Entertainment vs Results

Postby Bridge'srightfoot » Sat Dec 28, 2013 5:28 pm

Original Dub wrote:
Hutch's Shoulder wrote:
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote: Yesterday was fine example of other end of the scope. We were far from amazing but grinded a result in the end and what a feeling after that final whistle!


I wouldn't say we ground out out a result yesterday; we had some great moves during the game. We did though close it out effectively during the second half. Nevertheless, I would put yesterday in the entertainment camp.


It doesn't much more entertaining than the Liverpool game.

Today... a bit closer to a grind out alright.

We didn't grind out a result at all vs Liverpool. That was two great teams attacking each other for 90 minutes, end to end stuff. It's hardly like we shut up shop once we went ahead.

Today we had to grind out a bit, due to Palace being well organized and us resting some of our better players, we didn't play great but got the result.
Bridge'srightfoot
Rosler's Grandad Bombed The Swamp
 
Posts: 3996
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2010 9:49 pm
Supporter of: City

PreviousNext

Return to The Maine Football forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: CTID Hants, Mansour21, Nigels Tackle, PeterParker and 131 guests