Micah Richards

Here is the place to talk about all things city and football!

Re: Micah Richards

Postby Herb » Sun Jan 26, 2014 3:17 pm

london blue 2 wrote:
Herb wrote:To those out there who can't accept that carrying masses of unneeded upper body muscle is adverse to Micah's performance - please note that our fullbacks shuttle run box to box and that Micah simply can't do what he needs to do because he's built himself up.
Big and bulky may be ok for a 1 x 100 sprint but our fullbacks run several kilometers in every game - at lung bursting speed.

Micah has a run - then a walk - then a jog and . . . a while later . . another little run followed by falling on his nose because he's bolloxed - followed by another stroll for a while - followed by a little jog etc.

Zab runs hard all game because he has the heart for it and most importantly he can run hard all game because he has the right build for it and that's the key difference - it doesn't matter what Micah wants to do because he's fucked himself up trying to look sexy in the gym!

You'd think with our resources someone at the club would know this and work with him to reduce his muscle mass...

That to your talking rubbish


It's so bloody obvious that I can't even be arsed to educate you to the difference in build required for the current shuttle-running fullback role and the old more static role that Micah used to fill some years back. Suffice it to say that you're a bit dim and should learn to think before making stupid comments.
If we had De Gea and the rags had Hart, we'd be top with a 9 point lead and they'd be in 12th place - that's the difference between a 'good' keeper and a 'top class' keeper - 12 places - think about it.
Herb
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Balotelli's Fireworks Party
 
Posts: 823
Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2013 6:23 pm
Location: Out on the wiley, windy moors
Supporter of: City super City
My favourite player is: NOT Howler Hart!

Re: Micah Richards

Postby london blue 2 » Sun Jan 26, 2014 5:27 pm

Herb wrote:
london blue 2 wrote:
Herb wrote:To those out there who can't accept that carrying masses of unneeded upper body muscle is adverse to Micah's performance - please note that our fullbacks shuttle run box to box and that Micah simply can't do what he needs to do because he's built himself up.
Big and bulky may be ok for a 1 x 100 sprint but our fullbacks run several kilometers in every game - at lung bursting speed.

Micah has a run - then a walk - then a jog and . . . a while later . . another little run followed by falling on his nose because he's bolloxed - followed by another stroll for a while - followed by a little jog etc.

Zab runs hard all game because he has the heart for it and most importantly he can run hard all game because he has the right build for it and that's the key difference - it doesn't matter what Micah wants to do because he's fucked himself up trying to look sexy in the gym!

You'd think with our resources someone at the club would know this and work with him to reduce his muscle mass...

That to your talking rubbish


It's so bloody obvious that I can't even be arsed to educate you to the difference in build required for the current shuttle-running fullback role and the old more static role that Micah used to fill some years back. Suffice it to say that you're a bit dim and should learn to think before making stupid comments.

Maybe you should apply for a coaching job at the club, perhaps you could educate them ;)
london blue 2
Paul Power's Tash
 
Posts: 10339
Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 10:32 am
Location: london
Supporter of: MCFC

Re: Micah Richards

Postby Im_Spartacus » Sun Jan 26, 2014 5:46 pm

Herb wrote: It's so bloody obvious that I can't even be arsed to educate you to the difference in build required for the current shuttle-running fullback role and the old more static role that Micah used to fill some years back. Suffice it to say that you're a bit dim and should learn to think before making stupid comments.


With all respect, I've never done a 70 yard shuttle run.

Micah is a big lad, he is also a very fit lad who unfortunately has had issues with injuries. He is no bigger now than he was the last time we were criticising him for not running back in Hughes' tenure, nor is he any bigger than when he was up and down the pitch for 90 mins at a time in the title winning season.

The difference between these spells is motivation, seems Mancini was able to - and had the benefit of a long run of fitness. I'm not writing him off as I'm pretty sure he will improve his concentration with game time exactly as he did under Mancini
Im_Spartacus
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Denis Law's Backheel
 
Posts: 9577
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 8:41 pm
Location: Abu Dhabi
Supporter of: .

Re: Micah Richards

Postby MilnersJaw » Sun Jan 26, 2014 6:11 pm

maybe he is just lazy and can't be arsed defending. it is not like his bombing forward is setting the world alight either.

city are now in a position where we can attract foolballers and not have to pay excessive wages. We could get someone better for less.

something is seriously wrong if the manager has to waste a sub on a full back against a championship side. Obviously I didn't see the game but have read the comments on here, I don't buy into it because he is rusty, he is a professional footballer, he is a full back, he should know to run back and defend.
Still here.
User avatar
MilnersJaw
Kinky's Mazy Dribbles
 
Posts: 2229
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2012 4:59 pm
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: Silver

Re: Micah Richards

Postby Herb » Mon Jan 27, 2014 9:54 am

london blue 2 wrote:
Maybe you should apply for a coaching job at the club, perhaps you could educate them ;)


Grow up and stop trying to put a spin on this to mask your stupidity. Fact is that I simply said that Micah has bulked himself up to such an extent that he carries too much mass for the end to end shuttle running remit that our fullbacks have under the Pellegrini system.
If you don't agree with that then that's fine and you can put your counter argument to say that being shaped like an OTT bodybuilder is ideal for running long distances at explosive speeds and that Zab should bulk up to be more like MIcah if you think that's the case - go ahead and put your opinion on what I've said if you want but please don't try to spin it to make out that I believe that I'm a better coach than the current crop at the Etihad because that just makes you look like a cunt and I'd like to think you're better than that.
If we had De Gea and the rags had Hart, we'd be top with a 9 point lead and they'd be in 12th place - that's the difference between a 'good' keeper and a 'top class' keeper - 12 places - think about it.
Herb
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Balotelli's Fireworks Party
 
Posts: 823
Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2013 6:23 pm
Location: Out on the wiley, windy moors
Supporter of: City super City
My favourite player is: NOT Howler Hart!

Re: Micah Richards

Postby Burt » Mon Jan 27, 2014 11:19 am

Micah looks a shadow of the player that he was less than two years ago and his build is no different now to what it was then, when he was up and down the touchline like a greyhound.

The reasons must be that he isn't anywhere near his peak fitness yet, he is carrying an injury (unlikely that the medics would allow this)or he has a physchological problem. I suspect that it is the former and the problem we have now is that he is going to struggle to get his fitness back by sitting on the bench constantly. Ideally we should loan him out but do we have sufficient cover if Zaba gets injured or suspended?

Catch two situation really, so what do we do, sell him?
You can beat an egg but you can't beat a fuclin good sherman tank
Burt
Joe Hart's 29 Clean Sheets
 
Posts: 5087
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 2:25 pm
Location: Salford

Re: Micah Richards

Postby twosips » Mon Jan 27, 2014 11:39 am

I don't think it's anything to do with his size or weight or anything like that. To me its simply a case of that he's just massively lacking match practice cos he's been injured on and on for god knows how long. He'd need a run of 4/5 games to get back up to speed, but sadly that just isn't gonna happen with Zaba around so its tough for him.
twosips
Kinky's Mazy Dribbles
 
Posts: 2974
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 9:58 am
Supporter of: mcfc

Re: Micah Richards

Postby Hazy2 » Mon Jan 27, 2014 11:51 am

Is Samir, not proof players need confidence and things change, Micah has to let the penny drop or he can be part of a deal to get Luke Shaw for me. Sad but this City is all about things Micah lacks at the present time. Not a write off just looks a million miles from where we are.
Hazy2
Denis Law's Backheel
 
Posts: 9692
Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2010 11:34 am
Supporter of: MCFC
My favourite player is: Silva

Re: Micah Richards

Postby Ted Hughes » Mon Jan 27, 2014 12:20 pm

He was no worse than Kolarov 1st half. If we can accept it from him, we can accept it from Micah. Also, Kolarov does not track back better than Richards does, in general, so once again, if we can accept it from Kolarov we can accept it from Richards.

Sure Kolarov can cross a ball, but Micah does ok there when fit & is a better defender. Seems to be a player who struggles for a while to get his form/fitness back. When he does, he's usually as good, if not better, than Zabba. So let's hope he is soon match fit.

He went a bit billy big bollocks a few years back, but I don't buy that now. Just not match fit.

It's fine to pick out Micah's bad bits, but he's not alone & doesn't deserve special criticism when half fit.
The pissartist formerly known as Ted

VIVA EL CITY !!!

Some take the bible for what it's worth.. when they say that the rags shall inherit the Earth...
Well I heard that the Sheikh... bought Carlos Tevez this week...& you fuckers aint gettin' nothin..
Ted Hughes
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Colin Bell's Football Brain
 
Posts: 28488
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 4:28 pm
Supporter of: Bill Turnbull
My favourite player is: Bill Turnbull

Re: Micah Richards

Postby Hazy2 » Mon Jan 27, 2014 12:24 pm

Ted Hughes wrote:He was no worse than Kolarov 1st half. If we can accept it from him, we can accept it from Micah. Also, Kolarov does not track back better than Richards does, in general, so once again, if we can accept it from Kolarov we can accept it from Richards.

Sure Kolarov can cross a ball, but Micah does ok there when fit & is a better defender. Seems to be a player who struggles for a while to get his form/fitness back. When he does, he's usually as good, if not better, than Zabba. So let's hope he is soon match fit.

He went a bit billy big bollocks a few years back, but I don't buy that now. Just not match fit.

It's fine to pick out Micah's bad bits, but he's not alone & doesn't deserve special criticism when half fit.


VK is the perfect example of how to deal with injuries for Micah, he slots in as though never away, Top player and prof in all he does to get back ready to go.
Hazy2
Denis Law's Backheel
 
Posts: 9692
Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2010 11:34 am
Supporter of: MCFC
My favourite player is: Silva

Re: Micah Richards

Postby Ted Hughes » Mon Jan 27, 2014 12:32 pm

Hazy2 wrote:
Ted Hughes wrote:He was no worse than Kolarov 1st half. If we can accept it from him, we can accept it from Micah. Also, Kolarov does not track back better than Richards does, in general, so once again, if we can accept it from Kolarov we can accept it from Richards.

Sure Kolarov can cross a ball, but Micah does ok there when fit & is a better defender. Seems to be a player who struggles for a while to get his form/fitness back. When he does, he's usually as good, if not better, than Zabba. So let's hope he is soon match fit.

He went a bit billy big bollocks a few years back, but I don't buy that now. Just not match fit.

It's fine to pick out Micah's bad bits, but he's not alone & doesn't deserve special criticism when half fit.


VK is the perfect example of how to deal with injuries for Micah, he slots in as though never away, Top player and prof in all he does to get back ready to go.


He was straight back off again & out for about 6 weeks THEN he was fit.
The pissartist formerly known as Ted

VIVA EL CITY !!!

Some take the bible for what it's worth.. when they say that the rags shall inherit the Earth...
Well I heard that the Sheikh... bought Carlos Tevez this week...& you fuckers aint gettin' nothin..
Ted Hughes
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Colin Bell's Football Brain
 
Posts: 28488
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 4:28 pm
Supporter of: Bill Turnbull
My favourite player is: Bill Turnbull

Re: Micah Richards

Postby Hazy2 » Mon Jan 27, 2014 1:30 pm

Ted Hughes wrote:
Hazy2 wrote:
Ted Hughes wrote:He was no worse than Kolarov 1st half. If we can accept it from him, we can accept it from Micah. Also, Kolarov does not track back better than Richards does, in general, so once again, if we can accept it from Kolarov we can accept it from Richards.

Sure Kolarov can cross a ball, but Micah does ok there when fit & is a better defender. Seems to be a player who struggles for a while to get his form/fitness back. When he does, he's usually as good, if not better, than Zabba. So let's hope he is soon match fit.

He went a bit billy big bollocks a few years back, but I don't buy that now. Just not match fit.

It's fine to pick out Micah's bad bits, but he's not alone & doesn't deserve special criticism when half fit.


VK is the perfect example of how to deal with injuries for Micah, he slots in as though never away, Top player and prof in all he does to get back ready to go.


He was straight back off again & out for about 6 weeks THEN he was fit.


He has his conditioning, touch and feel for the game sorted before he comes back the injury repeat was just unlucky, Micah looks like an EDS player at times, A busy fool, way short of the level needed at the present time. Loan im to Swansea oe even Uwe at Wigan to get him games
Hazy2
Denis Law's Backheel
 
Posts: 9692
Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2010 11:34 am
Supporter of: MCFC
My favourite player is: Silva

Re: Micah Richards

Postby dazby » Mon Jan 27, 2014 9:11 pm

Have we found a new boo boy then?


He's the best back up right back in the league. Give him some games to run into some form.
User avatar
dazby
Joe Mercer's OBE
 
Posts: 19308
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 4:02 am
Location: Brisbane Australia
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: Ed

Re: Micah Richards

Postby carl_feedthegoat » Mon Jan 27, 2014 10:00 pm

dazby wrote:Have we found a new boo boy then?


He's the best back up right back in the league. Give him some games to run into some form.


We should have left him on against Watford, as who fuckign cares if we lost , at least Micah would have got some game time.

You fucking spastic!!
THEY SAY SWEARING IS DUE TO A LIMITED VOCABULARY. I KNOW THOUSANDS OF WORDS, BUT I STILL PREFER "FUCK OFF" TO "GO AWAY"
carl_feedthegoat
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 32245
Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2005 2:51 am
Supporter of: Man City

Re: Micah Richards

Postby london blue 2 » Mon Jan 27, 2014 10:44 pm

Herb wrote:
london blue 2 wrote:
Maybe you should apply for a coaching job at the club, perhaps you could educate them ;)


Grow up and stop trying to put a spin on this to mask your stupidity. Fact is that I simply said that Micah has bulked himself up to such an extent that he carries too much mass for the end to end shuttle running remit that our fullbacks have under the Pellegrini system.
If you don't agree with that then that's fine and you can put your counter argument to say that being shaped like an OTT bodybuilder is ideal for running long distances at explosive speeds and that Zab should bulk up to be more like MIcah if you think that's the case - go ahead and put your opinion on what I've said if you want but please don't try to spin it to make out that I believe that I'm a better coach than the current crop at the Etihad because that just makes you look like a cunt and I'd like to think you're better than that.

I don't have time for arguments and big long drawn out posts, my point was simply that if his bulk Is the reason that a) he can't sprint and b) he's always injured - do you not think that our coaching staff/managers/boffins at mcfc will have considered and addressed it?

I do.
london blue 2
Paul Power's Tash
 
Posts: 10339
Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 10:32 am
Location: london
Supporter of: MCFC

Re: Micah Richards

Postby DoomMerchant » Mon Jan 27, 2014 11:41 pm

carl_feedthegoat wrote:
We should have left him on against Watford, as who fuckign cares if we lost , at least Micah would have got some game time.

You fucking spastic!!


I care if we lost you old senile tit.

Cheers
User avatar
DoomMerchant
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Pellegrini's Hoodie
 
Posts: 22332
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 6:46 pm
Location: Orlando, FL
Supporter of: MCFC. OK.
My favourite player is: The Game

Re: Micah Richards

Postby blues2win » Tue Jan 28, 2014 12:15 am

Micah's never had a good enough football brain. That's why England manager after England manager decided not to pick him. He's not good enough defensively although better than Kolarov. In my view he's nowhere near as good as Kolarov going forward. Zaba's miles better all round than both. I think there's a good chance he'll be on his bike at the end of the season.
blues2win
Kaptain Kompany's Komposure
 
Posts: 14875
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 11:03 am
Supporter of: manchester city
My favourite player is: david silva

Re: Micah Richards

Postby mcfc1632 » Tue Jan 28, 2014 1:58 am

As much as I hate to admit it - I must be considered a Micah boo boy - and that makes me very disappointed in myself.

But he is simply never going to make it. The comparisons with Kolorov are actually quite helpful I think - yes people were on Kolorov's case and hugely frustrated - given a chance he has started to find some form - so the logic is - give Micah some game time and he will come good etc etc.

Point is though that people seem (IMO) to have some strange view of Micah's past record. I read posts about how good he was in our title winning season and before...... I hardly missed a game in those days and I can clearly remember being incandescently frustrated with his fucking cannot be arsed lazy attitude - I have posted many times on here in those days describing him as a world class fucking jogger!!

So yes- perhaps Kolorov is not the best defender - perhaps he is not as fast a Micah over 30m etc - but at least he fucking tries!! He can get outpaced but he is at least running at more or less his best pace. I have screamed at Micah to get back so many times. OK so he may not be able to get back to affect the direct attack that is ongoing because he is stranded up field (normally because he has bombed on and lost the ball through a total lack of skill / football brain) - but I have seen him so many times fail to get back to affect the 2nd or 3rd phase of an attack - his team mates must see him as a total liability, simply kept on to keep fans happy and because he is 'home grown'.

And in terms of adding to the team's capability though attacking skills - well I would not insult Kolorov by drawing any kind of comparison with Micah.

So yes - he had a few months when he seemed to have potential - seemed to be possibly something special perhaps - but fuck me that was for a very short time and very long time ago.

If we can get some team daft enough to pay £5m then we should offload without a second thought - I am all for loyalty but CITY have given a pretty average player a special position in life and have shown a lot of loyalty.

He has had plenty of time (IMO) to come good and all he has done is shown that he is less than Joe average - the fact that he comes out and makes statements about being good enough to go to Brazil shows that he has absolutely zero self-awareness.
mcfc1632
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Rosler's Grandad Bombed The Swamp
 
Posts: 3861
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 6:44 pm

Re: Micah Richards

Postby Bianchi on Ice » Tue Jan 28, 2014 2:06 am

blues2win wrote:Micah's never had a good enough football brain. That's why England manager after England manager decided not to pick him. He's not good enough defensively although better than Kolarov. In my view he's nowhere near as good as Kolarov going forward. Zaba's miles better all round than both. I think there's a good chance he'll be on his bike at the end of the season.


At least Micah recognises that his main role is as a defender unlike that wanker johnson who thankfully is out for the season. That cunt has no football brain at all. For pool he can get away with it but for england its painful. Only thing against Micah IMO is his snub before the euros. He should have said yes woy ill be there.
Bianchi on Ice
Rosler's Grandad Bombed The Swamp
 
Posts: 3973
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 3:28 pm
Supporter of: City
My favourite player is: warren beatty

Re: Micah Richards

Postby carl_feedthegoat » Tue Jan 28, 2014 2:47 am

DoomMerchant wrote:
carl_feedthegoat wrote:
We should have left him on against Watford, as who fuckign cares if we lost , at least Micah would have got some game time.

You fucking spastic!!


I care if we lost you old senile tit.

Cheers


Sarcasm is lost on you , you bald cunt.°!!
THEY SAY SWEARING IS DUE TO A LIMITED VOCABULARY. I KNOW THOUSANDS OF WORDS, BUT I STILL PREFER "FUCK OFF" TO "GO AWAY"
carl_feedthegoat
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 32245
Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2005 2:51 am
Supporter of: Man City

PreviousNext

Return to The Maine Football forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot], Mase, ruralblue and 127 guests