Peter Doherty (AGAIG) wrote:There seems to be an unwritten rule in football that if Barcelona are struggling in a game they get a penalty and a member of the opposing team sent off.
Slim wrote:Sideshow Bob wrote:Slim wrote:Dameerto wrote:Gibbs will have it overturned and it will be retrospectively awarded to Oxade-Chamberlain.
Gibbs will have it rescinded and Oxlade-Chamberlain will avoid any further punishment. Arsenal to field a full strength side against their next three opponents.
Oh look, that includes us.
This is what will happen no doubt.
Unfortunately I was mistaken, it will only be a one match ban either way and that'll be Swansea.
Hutch's Shoulder wrote:Oxlade-Chamberlain obviously thought it was going in too
bayblue wrote:Hutch's Shoulder wrote:Oxlade-Chamberlain obviously thought it was going in too
So surely it must be a red.... Otherwise intent means nothing???
Slim wrote:Having spoken to a friend of mine, he cited it as a professional foul and therefore a red. Made a lot of sense. This also covers the intent portion of the debate.
phips wrote:goal of the season right there. done and dusted.
Foreverinbluedreams wrote:phips wrote:goal of the season right there. done and dusted.
Why doesn't it surprise me to see you posting that. You're like a tabloid's wet dream.
He was effectively shooting at an open goal given the bollox the keeper made of it. It bounced 2 yards out from the goal, if the keeper was any use he would've back pedalled and had a simple catch.
Goal of the season my fucking arse.
Wonderwall wrote:Foreverinbluedreams wrote:phips wrote:goal of the season right there. done and dusted.
Why doesn't it surprise me to see you posting that. You're like a tabloid's wet dream.
He was effectively shooting at an open goal given the bollox the keeper made of it. It bounced 2 yards out from the goal, if the keeper was any use he would've back pedalled and had a simple catch.
Goal of the season my fucking arse.
Rooneys was a cracker but not a patch on the lad from Norwich, what a superb hit that was
Wonderwall wrote:Slim wrote:Having spoken to a friend of mine, he cited it as a professional foul and therefore a red. Made a lot of sense. This also covers the intent portion of the debate.
Hasn't the "professional foul" wording now been take out of the laws?
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Indianablue, Mase and 193 guests