Pause for thought (suspensions)

Here is the place to talk about all things city and football!

Pause for thought (suspensions)

Postby Wonderwall » Wed Dec 23, 2009 12:18 am

Following the thread on the michael turner sending off against us last weekend and the obvious other threads over the weeks, months and years.

This 4 match ban does nothing but benefit all our rivals. therefore I would love to come up with an alternative that will ensure the teams think about the penalties levied against them.

For example.

Sunderland should play against city with 10 men for the new 4 games that they face city.

or

Sunderlands michael turner will face a 4 match ban, 3 matches against the following 3 teams plus 1 game against man city with 10 men

or

When sunderland play against city next time, city must pick 1 player from the sunderland starting 11 who will not play in the game.

In short, what I dont want is all the other teams to have an advantage because of something that happened in our game. This will be fair for all sendings off in all games for all teams! Surely there must be something that can be sorted out that benefits the right teams in the right way.
User avatar
Wonderwall
Colin Bell's Football Brain
 
Posts: 28912
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 2:58 pm
Location: Sale
Supporter of: Gods own team

Re: Pause for thought

Postby yorkieblue » Wed Dec 23, 2009 12:23 am

Yeh that is a good point tbh, are sunderland playing anyone in the top 10 for next four games?
City Till I Die

Image
User avatar
yorkieblue
Darius Vassell's Composure
 
Posts: 323
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 6:48 pm
Location: York
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: Carlos Tevezzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Re: Pause for thought

Postby ronk » Wed Dec 23, 2009 12:27 am

It's punishment for the player, not compensation for us. That's why you go to jail for crimes instead of having to work for your victim's benefit.

In some ways, I'd be in favour of having suspensions served in the return fixture, where possible. So if you get a red card in an away match one of the matches you're banned for is the home fixture if that occurs. Other matches missed are immediate. It would certainly clean up derbies.

Otherwise you could piss off to some other league to avoid having to serve a suspension.
“Do onto others — then run!”
B. Hill
User avatar
ronk
Shaun Goater's 103 Goals
 
Posts: 7501
Joined: Thu May 18, 2006 12:23 am
Location: Dublin

Re: Pause for thought

Postby Beeks » Wed Dec 23, 2009 12:31 am

Wonderwall wrote:Following the thread on the michael turner sending off against us last weekend and the obvious other threads over the weeks, months and years.

This 4 match ban does nothing but benefit all our rivals. therefore I would love to come up with an alternative that will ensure the teams think about the penalties levied against them.

For example.

Sunderland should play against city with 10 men for the new 4 games that they face city.

or

Sunderlands michael turner will face a 4 match ban, 3 matches against the following 3 teams plus 1 game against man city with 10 men

or

When sunderland play against city next time, city must pick 1 player from the sunderland starting 11 who will not play in the game.

In short, what I dont want is all the other teams to have an advantage because of something that happened in our game. This will be fair for all sendings off in all games for all teams! Surely there must be something that can be sorted out that benefits the right teams in the right way.


WW you are probably one of the most sensible posters on mcf.net but I think you've been hanging round Garry Cook too long...either that or you've been at the christmas port too early

Perhaps...in some utopian alternative society which runs parallel to our time continuum this theory might be common place...where teams play 11 against 10 from the kick off and the opposition get to pick who to leave out...but here in our time pocket that's just plain bonkers and only reserved for Sepp Blatter type winos to ramble under their breath about ;-)
Last edited by Beeks on Wed Dec 23, 2009 12:32 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image
User avatar
Beeks
Shaun Goater's 103 Goals
 
Posts: 7545
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 9:43 am
Location: Leigh/South Stand 116
Supporter of: The Sky Blues
My favourite player is: Fernandinho

Re: Pause for thought

Postby Robert » Wed Dec 23, 2009 12:32 am

wasn't foe banned for his next two games but he fucked off abroad then came to us and we appealed it ?? when he was at west ham?
Robert
Nedum Onuoha's A-levels
 
Posts: 91
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 11:04 am

Re: Pause for thought

Postby Wonderwall » Wed Dec 23, 2009 12:35 am

ok, how about the following.

ther are 6 thirds 0-15, 15-30, 30-45+, 45-60, 60-75, 75-90+.

Example:- Turner gets sent off against city at eastlands in the 90+ minute, then they will know that the next game against city will mean they will be a player down from the 75th minute as their player was sent off in that section of the game. Also, to make it much more tastier, the opposition coach (i.e.mancini) would choose which sunderland player to be removed on the 75th minute.

Sounds fair to me.

The only problem is relegated teams and that will have a holding time of 3 years.
User avatar
Wonderwall
Colin Bell's Football Brain
 
Posts: 28912
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 2:58 pm
Location: Sale
Supporter of: Gods own team

Re: Pause for thought

Postby LookMumImOnMCF.net » Wed Dec 23, 2009 12:42 am

Wonderwall wrote:ok, how about the following.

ther are 6 thirds 0-15, 15-30, 30-45+, 45-60, 60-75, 75-90+.

Example:- Turner gets sent off against city at eastlands in the 90+ minute, then they will know that the next game against city will mean they will be a player down from the 75th minute as their player was sent off in that section of the game. Also, to make it much more tastier, the opposition coach (i.e.mancini) would choose which sunderland player to be removed on the 75th minute.

Sounds fair to me.

The only problem is relegated teams and that will have a holding time of 3 years.

Quite frankly, sir, I think you have too much time on your hands.
LookMumImOnMCF.net
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Denis Law's Backheel
 
Posts: 9316
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 5:49 pm
Supporter of: LookMumI'mOnMCF.net
My favourite player is: LookMumI'mOnMCF.net

Re: Pause for thought (suspensions)

Postby Typical City » Wed Dec 23, 2009 1:06 am

Wonderwall wrote:Following the thread on the michael turner sending off against us last weekend and the obvious other threads over the weeks, months and years.

This 4 match ban does nothing but benefit all our rivals. therefore I would love to come up with an alternative that will ensure the teams think about the penalties levied against them.

For example.

Sunderland should play against city with 10 men for the new 4 games that they face city.

or

Sunderlands michael turner will face a 4 match ban, 3 matches against the following 3 teams plus 1 game against man city with 10 men

or

When sunderland play against city next time, city must pick 1 player from the sunderland starting 11 who will not play in the game.

In short, what I dont want is all the other teams to have an advantage because of something that happened in our game. This will be fair for all sendings off in all games for all teams! Surely there must be something that can be sorted out that benefits the right teams in the right way.


How about he is now suspended for his next 4 games against City or the offended team (us) can pick who he is suspended against? Just two 'out of the box' ideas.
Image
User avatar
Typical City
Robinho's Step Over
 
Posts: 278
Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2008 6:42 pm

Re: Pause for thought (suspensions)

Postby Pretty Boy Lee » Wed Dec 23, 2009 6:03 am

What about if it was us and them in a relegation dog fight with 4 games left, would you not want it to be immediate then or risk it being null and void for the next season?

So many scenarios can be found to support or oppose any system, let's nit go for radical change that could as many if not more flaws.
Tracking back is overrated.
Image
Pretty Boy Lee
Pablo Zabaleta's Manc Accent
 
Posts: 13324
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 1:22 am
Location: Brisbane baby!
Supporter of: City!
My favourite player is: Yaya

Re: Pause for thought (suspensions)

Postby Slim » Wed Dec 23, 2009 6:05 am

Wonderwall wrote:Following the thread on the michael turner sending off against us last weekend and the obvious other threads over the weeks, months and years.

This 4 match ban does nothing but benefit all our rivals. therefore I would love to come up with an alternative that will ensure the teams think about the penalties levied against them.

For example.

Sunderland should play against city with 10 men for the new 4 games that they face city.

or

Sunderlands michael turner will face a 4 match ban, 3 matches against the following 3 teams plus 1 game against man city with 10 men

or

When sunderland play against city next time, city must pick 1 player from the sunderland starting 11 who will not play in the game.

In short, what I dont want is all the other teams to have an advantage because of something that happened in our game. This will be fair for all sendings off in all games for all teams! Surely there must be something that can be sorted out that benefits the right teams in the right way.


You thieving bastard, I told you this very idea a couple of years ago....couple of twists, but YOU THIEVING BASTARD.
Image
User avatar
Slim
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 30344
Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2006 3:57 am
Location: Perth

Re: Pause for thought (suspensions)

Postby sweenyuk » Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:33 am

The ban needs to be instant. If you were bottom of the league and about to conceed a goal you would commit a profesional foul if you felt the suspension would not kick in till next season. More complications of player moving club, retiring, club being relegated etc would make this idea impossible. To make for an instant benefit to the club that was fouled, maybe for a red card incident outside of the penalty area there should be a one against one challange. So the attacking team nominate 1 player to take on just the goalie for 10 seconds, with all other players then coming in to play after the 10 second whistle. This would make the profesional foul a waste as the attacker would be back in a one against one situation. If it is the goalie who comits the foul, then a goal should be awarded
User avatar
sweenyuk
De Jong's Tackle
 
Posts: 1012
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2007 6:54 pm
Location: Leigh
Supporter of: City
My favourite player is: Silva

Re: Pause for thought (suspensions)

Postby john@staustell » Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:37 am

Too much thinking WW, far too much thinking. Get the wine out and relax!
“I may be drunk, Miss, but in the morning I will be sober and you will still be ugly.”
User avatar
john@staustell
Joe Mercer's OBE
 
Posts: 19417
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 9:35 am
Location: St Austell
Supporter of: City

Re: Pause for thought (suspensions)

Postby razor400 » Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:40 am

john@staustell wrote:Too much thinking WW, far too much thinking. Get the wine out and relax!



I think too much wine may be the problem mate ;-)
Image
[/border][/b]
[/color]
User avatar
razor400
Rosler's Grandad Bombed The Swamp
 
Posts: 3749
Joined: Mon May 07, 2007 10:58 am
Location: Sunny Plymouth
Supporter of: Champions
My favourite player is: Zabba

Re: Pause for thought (suspensions)

Postby Blueboylewis » Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:43 am

Some good ideas there but i dont think the fa would agree to bringing in new rules like that tbf.
User avatar
Blueboylewis
Rosler's Grandad Bombed The Swamp
 
Posts: 3746
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 9:14 am
Location: Manchester
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: David Silva

Re: Pause for thought (suspensions)

Postby irblinx » Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:43 am

er WW, have you been at the Christmas spirit already?

The changes you propose would be completely unworkable, it would result in even more running to the courts than we already see creeping into the game. "Why should we be punished this season for the indiscretion of a player we sold in the summer", "He knew he could get away with a handball in the final minute and only get sent off cos it meant we'd get relegated and don't have the resources to get back so would never have to play them again in the league". There's nothing wrong with the rules as they stand, the deterrent is that the player will miss games immediately, not in 6-12 months time when his club has had ample time to plan for the absence
User avatar
irblinx
David Silva's Silky Skills
 
Posts: 6377
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 11:06 am

Re: Pause for thought (suspensions)

Postby blues-clues » Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:46 am

All these extra penalties that result from red or yellow cards would place far too much emphasis on the referees, they would hugely increase the risk of corruption and would result in vast amounts being spent on appeals to higher and higher courts. The implications would be like Tevez and Sheff Utd all over again but every couple of weeks.
User avatar
blues-clues
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Kinky's Mazy Dribbles
 
Posts: 2071
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 11:57 pm
Supporter of: Man City
My favourite player is: Joe Corrigan

Re: Pause for thought (suspensions)

Postby Wonderwall » Wed Dec 23, 2009 10:12 am

Slim wrote:You thieving bastard, I told you this very idea a couple of years ago....couple of twists, but YOU THIEVING BASTARD.


it was probably me that told you! If you think I can remember that far back, you are giving me wayyy too much credit. My memory is shot to shit.

Wow I have a hangover, dont remember posting that last night ;-S Good idea though i principal. Why do others benefit from something that happened against us.
User avatar
Wonderwall
Colin Bell's Football Brain
 
Posts: 28912
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 2:58 pm
Location: Sale
Supporter of: Gods own team

Re: Pause for thought (suspensions)

Postby bluej » Wed Dec 23, 2009 11:45 am

Never mind the Christmas spirit, I think WW has been hitting the christmas crack-pipe!
bluej
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Kinky's Mazy Dribbles
 
Posts: 2654
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 12:11 am
Supporter of: MCFC


Return to The Maine Football forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: carolina-blue, gmercer1, ian494, Majestic-12 [Bot], Sparklehorse, Stan, Two's Kompany and 56 guests