Wonderwall wrote:Following the thread on the michael turner sending off against us last weekend and the obvious other threads over the weeks, months and years.
This 4 match ban does nothing but benefit all our rivals. therefore I would love to come up with an alternative that will ensure the teams think about the penalties levied against them.
For example.
Sunderland should play against city with 10 men for the new 4 games that they face city.
or
Sunderlands michael turner will face a 4 match ban, 3 matches against the following 3 teams plus 1 game against man city with 10 men
or
When sunderland play against city next time, city must pick 1 player from the sunderland starting 11 who will not play in the game.
In short, what I dont want is all the other teams to have an advantage because of something that happened in our game. This will be fair for all sendings off in all games for all teams! Surely there must be something that can be sorted out that benefits the right teams in the right way.
Wonderwall wrote:ok, how about the following.
ther are 6 thirds 0-15, 15-30, 30-45+, 45-60, 60-75, 75-90+.
Example:- Turner gets sent off against city at eastlands in the 90+ minute, then they will know that the next game against city will mean they will be a player down from the 75th minute as their player was sent off in that section of the game. Also, to make it much more tastier, the opposition coach (i.e.mancini) would choose which sunderland player to be removed on the 75th minute.
Sounds fair to me.
The only problem is relegated teams and that will have a holding time of 3 years.
Wonderwall wrote:Following the thread on the michael turner sending off against us last weekend and the obvious other threads over the weeks, months and years.
This 4 match ban does nothing but benefit all our rivals. therefore I would love to come up with an alternative that will ensure the teams think about the penalties levied against them.
For example.
Sunderland should play against city with 10 men for the new 4 games that they face city.
or
Sunderlands michael turner will face a 4 match ban, 3 matches against the following 3 teams plus 1 game against man city with 10 men
or
When sunderland play against city next time, city must pick 1 player from the sunderland starting 11 who will not play in the game.
In short, what I dont want is all the other teams to have an advantage because of something that happened in our game. This will be fair for all sendings off in all games for all teams! Surely there must be something that can be sorted out that benefits the right teams in the right way.
Wonderwall wrote:Following the thread on the michael turner sending off against us last weekend and the obvious other threads over the weeks, months and years.
This 4 match ban does nothing but benefit all our rivals. therefore I would love to come up with an alternative that will ensure the teams think about the penalties levied against them.
For example.
Sunderland should play against city with 10 men for the new 4 games that they face city.
or
Sunderlands michael turner will face a 4 match ban, 3 matches against the following 3 teams plus 1 game against man city with 10 men
or
When sunderland play against city next time, city must pick 1 player from the sunderland starting 11 who will not play in the game.
In short, what I dont want is all the other teams to have an advantage because of something that happened in our game. This will be fair for all sendings off in all games for all teams! Surely there must be something that can be sorted out that benefits the right teams in the right way.
john@staustell wrote:Too much thinking WW, far too much thinking. Get the wine out and relax!
Slim wrote:You thieving bastard, I told you this very idea a couple of years ago....couple of twists, but YOU THIEVING BASTARD.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Bluemoon4610, Dubaimancityfan, Majestic-12 [Bot], nottsblue, stupot and 122 guests