I personally hate the media bias mate and believe it should be highlighted as much as possible (no shortage there).
Cocacolajojo wrote:I personally hate the media bias mate and believe it should be highlighted as much as possible (no shortage there).
I never would've guessed Beefy. You hide it well.
feedthegreek wrote:david seaman was on talksport earlier. the master horse trainer quinn asked him why arsenal were so inconsistant, to which he replied they need to go on a good run like chelsea or the scum, city totally ignored by an ex city player ffs.
Cocacolajojo wrote:I personally hate the media bias mate and believe it should be highlighted as much as possible (no shortage there).
I never would've guessed Beefy. You hide it well.
Mikhail Chigorin wrote:Cocacolajojo wrote:I personally hate the media bias mate and believe it should be highlighted as much as possible (no shortage there).
I never would've guessed Beefy. You hide it well.
Perhaps the evidence of media bias and antipathy towards City, as well as everyone else's agenda against us, ought to be brought together in one permanent thread on this forum.
It would soon grow to alarmingly massive proportions, but with every instance of such disgusting bias recorded in one thread location, it could have several putatively beneficial effects :-
(i) Those innocent simpletons on this forum, who still believe that all this talk about an 'agenda' is just so much misplaced hot-air, would be both horrified and mortified to see the extent of the animosity generated against us by all and sundry.
(ii) Any 'journalists' (and I use the term in the loosest and vaguest sense) who log onto this forum to spy on City business, might just be sufficiently shamed to induce themselves to wake up and turn over a new leaf.
(iii) If any of the Club's Management Team were to view it, there might be increased incentive for them to ban such 'offenders' from the Stadium.
Beefymcfc wrote:Tokyo Blue wrote:Even on the BBC website Football page we are the 13th story down.
As long as the points keep coming in, I am happy.
The players themselves can't fail to see it. Perhaps it serves as extra motivation for them.
To be fair mate, we were one of two secondary stories on the main page, just below the main one - MotD mainly featuring the Rags, Chelsea and Arsenal. Obviously, after an edit, we're now behind the 'Giroud - Sorry' , 'Irvine Worried about Job' and a raft of others which include Chelsea at the top with 3 Rag stories (Wiggy, Wiggy & Ta Maria) before our excellent win, in tough conditions, without a striker.
No bias though, surely?
Wish I'd started a 'MotD' thread now but just not got the energy.
Original Dub wrote:Mikhail Chigorin wrote:Cocacolajojo wrote:I personally hate the media bias mate and believe it should be highlighted as much as possible (no shortage there).
I never would've guessed Beefy. You hide it well.
Perhaps the evidence of media bias and antipathy towards City, as well as everyone else's agenda against us, ought to be brought together in one permanent thread on this forum.
It would soon grow to alarmingly massive proportions, but with every instance of such disgusting bias recorded in one thread location, it could have several putatively beneficial effects :-
(i) Those innocent simpletons on this forum, who still believe that all this talk about an 'agenda' is just so much misplaced hot-air, would be both horrified and mortified to see the extent of the animosity generated against us by all and sundry.
(ii) Any 'journalists' (and I use the term in the loosest and vaguest sense) who log onto this forum to spy on City business, might just be sufficiently shamed to induce themselves to wake up and turn over a new leaf.
(iii) If any of the Club's Management Team were to view it, there might be increased incentive for them to ban such 'offenders' from the Stadium.
There are two fucktards who still think the rest of us are paranoid.
getdressedmctavish wrote:to all the sad souls who believe this clap trap.... try and focus on something important like enjoying the wife's body and company, maybe thinking up some songs or jokes, caring for a disabled person, or enjoying a hobby. The rivers in manc need a helping hand to get cleaner, get your waders on and go plant some ranunculus but do yourselves a favour and give up this nonsense, its childish in the extreme.
getdressedmctavish wrote:to all the sad souls who believe this clap trap.... try and focus on something important like enjoying the wife's body and company, maybe thinking up some songs or jokes, caring for a disabled person, or enjoying a hobby. The rivers in manc need a helping hand to get cleaner, get your waders on and go plant some ranunculus but do yourselves a favour and give up this nonsense, its childish in the extreme.
Mikhail Chigorin wrote:getdressedmctavish wrote:to all the sad souls who believe this clap trap.... try and focus on something important like enjoying the wife's body and company, maybe thinking up some songs or jokes, caring for a disabled person, or enjoying a hobby. The rivers in manc need a helping hand to get cleaner, get your waders on and go plant some ranunculus but do yourselves a favour and give up this nonsense, its childish in the extreme.
Aaah, one of the 'innocent simpletons' emerges from the unfathomable depths of his nightmare-free slumbers.
In actuality, I do focus upon things that are important :- I do enjoy the company of the lady wife, I play keyboards and flute in a musical duo and I do write all our songs. Until my Mum died earlier this year, I did look after a disabled person and I do have numerous hobbies such as playing and studying chess, building models of World War II warships, reading about history, designing gardens and trying to learn a little of foreign languages.
I also have an abiding passion in my life which is City and so I refuse to do myself a favour "and give up all of this nonsense", because the "clap-trap" you refer to is a massive and unremitting campaign directed against the Club that I love, in a perverted attempt to de-stabilise it and I find it hurts more than I can imagine to have to suffer it.
If you believe that there is no agenda against City, you are totally unfeeling and you might actually be considered to have your own, inimitable agenda, be whatsoever it may be.
sheblue wrote:It is astonishing that some people can not see the bias against mcfc. It is a blatant as blatant could be.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Harry Dowd scored, Majestic-12 [Bot], salford city and 172 guests