Ted Hughes wrote:Bale is a very expensive example of the Bellamy type player I'm talking about I think.
But for the 'big' player I'm thinking more someone who runs the game. I don't even think Ronaldo is it tbh, a matchwinner for sure, but a 25 year old Gerrard, would have been more likely to sort out Barca last night, than relying on erratic bursts of genius from Ronaldo I think.
Re Silva. He is like a forward, who works hard, not a midfielder who works hard. Same with Nasri, although Nasri is a bit more solid. Those two, plus two forwards, is like having 4 forwards, especially when all 4 actually move forward & leave a great big hole behind. They work hard for 'gifted' type players, but not as hard as proper midfield players.
That's the reason we don't press as we should & the only reason for even contemplating 5 in the middle.
Hazy2 wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:Bale is a very expensive example of the Bellamy type player I'm talking about I think.
But for the 'big' player I'm thinking more someone who runs the game. I don't even think Ronaldo is it tbh, a matchwinner for sure, but a 25 year old Gerrard, would have been more likely to sort out Barca last night, than relying on erratic bursts of genius from Ronaldo I think.
Re Silva. He is like a forward, who works hard, not a midfielder who works hard. Same with Nasri, although Nasri is a bit more solid. Those two, plus two forwards, is like having 4 forwards, especially when all 4 actually move forward & leave a great big hole behind. They work hard for 'gifted' type players, but not as hard as proper midfield players.
That's the reason we don't press as we should & the only reason for even contemplating 5 in the middle.
For me Silva is the player you have to set about freeing on nights like last night he will then feed Sergio who needs early ball and anything will happen. Athletico M have a tempo to the game, for sure they can get done as Barca did in the CDR. We lack nouse and bollocks at time it does baffle me. I also think Pellers is deluded in thinking the CM was the way to set up. It was no war zone in there. Iniesta is not the player he was and Ratic and Busquets looked like a level above, our shape was horrible and did nobody any favours, The game was close to over in 30 odd mins. I still do not see any defenders at City good on the ball they are all poor and the ball is turned over so easy it made Barca flow along like a training session, Once we went for it the game could have seen us score 4 in 15 mins 2nd half. We need early ball at every chance Sergio is our only world class striker and the best in the league slow ball kills his runs and pisses him off you can see it at times. How many weeks to prepare for Barca and it's the wheelie bin plus Milner FFS, where was that plan hatched is the biggest worry coz the dippers will play us of the park as will Spurs..
twosips wrote:Really? Don't think Isco is anything like Bellamy from what i know but fair enough. He's another Nasri/Silva really i think.
Ted Hughes wrote:Hazy2 wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:Bale is a very expensive example of the Bellamy type player I'm talking about I think.
But for the 'big' player I'm thinking more someone who runs the game. I don't even think Ronaldo is it tbh, a matchwinner for sure, but a 25 year old Gerrard, would have been more likely to sort out Barca last night, than relying on erratic bursts of genius from Ronaldo I think.
Re Silva. He is like a forward, who works hard, not a midfielder who works hard. Same with Nasri, although Nasri is a bit more solid. Those two, plus two forwards, is like having 4 forwards, especially when all 4 actually move forward & leave a great big hole behind. They work hard for 'gifted' type players, but not as hard as proper midfield players.
That's the reason we don't press as we should & the only reason for even contemplating 5 in the middle.
For me Silva is the player you have to set about freeing on nights like last night he will then feed Sergio who needs early ball and anything will happen. Athletico M have a tempo to the game, for sure they can get done as Barca did in the CDR. We lack nouse and bollocks at time it does baffle me. I also think Pellers is deluded in thinking the CM was the way to set up. It was no war zone in there. Iniesta is not the player he was and Ratic and Busquets looked like a level above, our shape was horrible and did nobody any favours, The game was close to over in 30 odd mins. I still do not see any defenders at City good on the ball they are all poor and the ball is turned over so easy it made Barca flow along like a training session, Once we went for it the game could have seen us score 4 in 15 mins 2nd half. We need early ball at every chance Sergio is our only world class striker and the best in the league slow ball kills his runs and pisses him off you can see it at times. How many weeks to prepare for Barca and it's the wheelie bin plus Milner FFS, where was that plan hatched is the biggest worry coz the dippers will play us of the park as will Spurs..
We filled the midfield v Bayern & got dicked in there by ten men.
Just like yesterday, our players couldn't string 3 passes together & the goals they scored were down to piss poor defending, not genius from the oppo. It's got nothing to do with one man extra in midfield; we would need 3 or 4 playing like that.
All of City's defenders are on the whole fine on the ball, when it's not Messi etc closing them down. In Europe, they shit themselves & can't think straight. Same with Silva & Nasri they are struggling just to play simple passes & not lose the ball. All their confidence recieving the ball goes.
Ali Benarbia would wipe the floor with the pair of them in a game like that.
One bloke extra in midfield is not going to change that, it's punditry/ fantasy football.
Martinez knew exactly what happened last night. And so did Pelegrini. Fuck all to do with formations; all to do with players not doing their jobs.
We need some new options.
nottsblue wrote:Must be just me and at the risk of a meltdown, Suarez could be the guy
nottsblue wrote:Must be just me and at the risk of a meltdown, Suarez could be the guy
Im_Spartacus wrote:nottsblue wrote:In reality, there is no realistic way that Suarez, Neymar and Messi will stay at that club for more than a year or two without one or more getting pissed off and wanting to leave. We have to be in there at that point, although if it was Neymar I'd have my reservations.
nottsblue wrote:Must be just me and at the risk of a meltdown, Suarez could be the guy
Blue Since 76 wrote:Bollocks, Ted. Not what you said, what we need.
Yaya has been a big game player, the one when things aren't going right will step up and do something world class. But he's not what we need (although we missed him last night).
As much as I hate him, what we need is a Keane. The sort of player who 3-0 up or 3-0 down would break someone's leg rather than let them score in the 94th minute. Someone the other players would be terrified of. When Vieira picked on Neville in the tunnel, who jumped in? If a bad tackle went in against City now, who works you expect to start the brawl? Zaba maybe. Anyone else? Anyone fancy Nasri behind them when someone's threatening to break your legs?
Bellamy did that - pick a fight with the biggest opposition player just to prove a point. Barry and de Jong could do it to some extent by booting someone into the air and getting the crowd going. Tevez would drag us through a bad spell - I still remember him being kicked off the pitch by Wigan to the point where he could barely walk, yet he scored a hat trick.
The fear last night was palpable, as it was last season. We may talk big before the game, but on the night, no one will try anything. We need a leader.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Blue In Bolton, Bluemoon4610, city72, Majestic-12 [Bot], Mase, salford city and 111 guests