mr_nool wrote:I guess this goes along with Ted's rugby idea above:
Yellow card for all and everyone crowding the ref. No discussions, just pull up the yellow card as soon as players start closing in.
phips wrote:mr_nool wrote:I guess this goes along with Ted's rugby idea above:
Yellow card for all and everyone crowding the ref. No discussions, just pull up the yellow card as soon as players start closing in.
didn't even see this when i posted. glad im not alone.
Wonderwall wrote:phips wrote:mr_nool wrote:I guess this goes along with Ted's rugby idea above:
Yellow card for all and everyone crowding the ref. No discussions, just pull up the yellow card as soon as players start closing in.
didn't even see this when i posted. glad im not alone.
It might actually take something as radical as 5 sendings off in a game to get the rest of the league to sit up and take notice. The money being invested means the premier league have a very viable product they want to sell again and again. However, this product could easily be ruined if not treated correctly.
Wonderwall wrote:phips wrote:mr_nool wrote:I guess this goes along with Ted's rugby idea above:
Yellow card for all and everyone crowding the ref. No discussions, just pull up the yellow card as soon as players start closing in.
didn't even see this when i posted. glad im not alone.
It might actually take something as radical as 5 sendings off in a game to get the rest of the league to sit up and take notice. The money being invested means the premier league have a very viable product they want to sell again and again. However, this product could easily be ruined if not treated correctly.
Goaters 103 wrote:Wonderwall wrote:phips wrote:mr_nool wrote:I guess this goes along with Ted's rugby idea above:
Yellow card for all and everyone crowding the ref. No discussions, just pull up the yellow card as soon as players start closing in.
didn't even see this when i posted. glad im not alone.
It might actually take something as radical as 5 sendings off in a game to get the rest of the league to sit up and take notice. The money being invested means the premier league have a very viable product they want to sell again and again. However, this product could easily be ruined if not treated correctly.
I was at the Rangers v Hearts game in the mid 90s when Hearts had 4 sent off and finished with 7. I can say from experience that it certainly changes a game!
Hearts looked like they actively wanted another sent off to void the game, as apparently once a team is down to 6 it results in an abandonment.
Ted Hughes wrote:
I suggested a while back that it would be good if extra subs could be used, but only if they are academy players. That would go a lot further towards the outcome Dyke 'says' he is trying to achieve.
Moonchesteri wrote:Oh, and allow standing and drinking in the stands.
that should maybe be in another topic but hey ho.
mr_nool wrote:Players staying down after a challenge should be taken/carried off the pitch immediately and not be allowed back on the pitch for a fixed amount of time, let's say five minutes.
This suggestion would of course be moot if we got with Picc's suggestion about effective time.
Pretty Boy Lee wrote:mr_nool wrote:Players staying down after a challenge should be taken/carried off the pitch immediately and not be allowed back on the pitch for a fixed amount of time, let's say five minutes.
This suggestion would of course be moot if we got with Picc's suggestion about effective time.
Another one that making a rule could ruin games. Players get hurt in non sending off challenges all the time. Why should me getting hurt by your foul cost my team 5 mins?
Simply use rules already in place to punish time wasters. The ones that spring back up, make them wait or card them,
mr_nool wrote:Pretty Boy Lee wrote:mr_nool wrote:Players staying down after a challenge should be taken/carried off the pitch immediately and not be allowed back on the pitch for a fixed amount of time, let's say five minutes.
This suggestion would of course be moot if we got with Picc's suggestion about effective time.
Another one that making a rule could ruin games. Players get hurt in non sending off challenges all the time. Why should me getting hurt by your foul cost my team 5 mins?
Simply use rules already in place to punish time wasters. The ones that spring back up, make them wait or card them,
I think you would find that a lot less players would be "injured" if they had to wait a few minutes by the side of the pitch before being allowed back into play.
Foreverinbluedreams wrote:Give the refs tasers
Any backchat and you get tasered. Watch them shut the fuck up.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Bluemoon4610, carolina-blue, CTID Hants, Jonty22, plee and 178 guests