Mikhail Chigorin wrote:london blue 2 wrote:Cocacolajojo wrote:bigblue wrote:Quinn on Sergio:
"There was definite INTENT to injure or hurt the player"
If I ever run into Quinn there will be definite intent to injure or hurt
Had it been against any of our players I would be fuming if it wasn't given. If Sergio plays in the derby we're a lucky team.
This is spot on.
It was naughty. Annoying that they're making a meal, and they did backtrack a bit. But Sergio deserves what he gets for it.
In the same way that Bogbrush always gets what he deserves for his misdemeanours.
Beefymcfc wrote:london blue 2 wrote:Cocacolajojo wrote:bigblue wrote:Quinn on Sergio:
"There was definite INTENT to injure or hurt the player"
If I ever run into Quinn there will be definite intent to injure or hurt
Had it been against any of our players I would be fuming if it wasn't given. If Sergio plays in the derby we're a lucky team.
This is spot on.
It was naughty. Annoying that they're making a meal, and they did backtrack a bit. But Sergio deserves what he gets for it.
It was naughty and I think it deserves a ban but it's the intent that the media has that fucks me off.
Spurge wrote:Cocacolajojo wrote:bigblue wrote:Quinn on Sergio:
"There was definite INTENT to injure or hurt the player"
If I ever run into Quinn there will be definite intent to injure or hurt
Had it been against any of our players I would be fuming if it wasn't given. If Sergio plays in the derby we're a lucky team.
I think it was a frustrating afternoon for Sergio a point illustrated by 'that incident' whether intentional or not only Sergio will know. Because of the new directives in clamping down on the perceived ugly side of the game I've no doubt the prem league officials will be rubbing their hands at the opportunity to use this as a means to underline their approach by banning him - a high profile player just before one of the biggest games of the season. On the plus we scored goals without Sergio scoring and should have seen others - kdb, Silva and nolito who should have also have netted. Lets not forget Iheanacho of course who will get the chance to showcase his attacking skills if Sergio is banned and is very capable.
That is of course unless pep plays nasri up front!
ayrshireblue wrote:Going on about Aguero but completely ignoring the ref gave the West Ham left back a free ride after his booking and no mention of the shocking challenge on Caballero which could well have been a straight red card. If we were playing Bournemouth the next game they wouldn't be trying so hard to get Aguero banned but because it's the scum they're desperate to get him banned. And just wait till Mourinho starts spouting his vile garbage on the incident even though he doesn't talk about other clubs.
sheblue wrote:Really can't get it with quinn. Can someone explain his apartent dislike? Or is it he's is saying what he is being told to say by his pay masters, if so hes just another sky puppet.
Bluedj wrote:I heard he wanted to buy into City when we were shit and the board told him and his consortium to do one
Bluedj wrote:I heard he wanted to buy into City when we were shit and the board told him and his consortium to do one
failsworthblue wrote:First Half was majestic , David Silva was on a different level.
Second Half , lost our way a bit after the goal , but always looked liked getting another one or two.
I think Sanga will come straight back into the team , Zabba's legs have gone.
The fullbacks are the missing piece of the jigsaw for me.
Teams will be beat in the Tunnel within the next 3 months.
failsworthblue wrote:Was at fault for the goal and kept doing the overlap which is not the style Pep is trying to instil.
Clichy was much tighter to their players.
Not having a go at him but he was the weak link today.
failsworthblue wrote:Was at fault for the goal and kept doing the overlap which is not the style Pep is trying to instil.
Clichy was much tighter to their players.
Not having a go at him but he was the weak link today.
Beefymcfc wrote:failsworthblue wrote:Was at fault for the goal and kept doing the overlap which is not the style Pep is trying to instil.
Clichy was much tighter to their players.
Not having a go at him but he was the weak link today.
Do you think those 20 minutes is what Pep was looking for?
The whole team were at fault for the goal, Zab's is just a figure to point at.
We lost it, mentally, but players like Zab's instilled it back into us.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: carl_feedthegoat, Dubciteh, Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 98 guests