iwasthere2012 wrote:I say just go for it and fuck them.
I know McClean(I think) chose not to wear it a couple of years back and that's fine with me. Individual choice and all that.
But maybe I have this all wrong, but is the poppy not worn in commemoration of all those that have fallen in battle in WW2.
Why the hell would anyone object to that.
It should not be forgotten. To hell with UEFA. Just do it.
zuricity wrote:The idiots at the FA had no need to raise the issue with Fifa , selfrighteous gits and pen pushers ( expensive ones as well
Mase wrote:'I mourn their deaths like every other decent person and if the Poppy was a symbol only for the lost souls of World War I and II I would wear one.
I want to make that 100% clear .You must understand this. ...But the Poppy is used to remember victims of other conflicts since 1945 and this is where the problem starts for me.
johnny crossan wrote:Mase wrote:'I mourn their deaths like every other decent person and if the Poppy was a symbol only for the lost souls of World War I and II I would wear one.
I want to make that 100% clear .You must understand this. ...But the Poppy is used to remember victims of other conflicts since 1945 and this is where the problem starts for me.
There is no difference, it's a political statement about the British oppressor in Ireland and McLean and his ilk could just as well have used the 1916 Easter Rising as a date or indeed a time after any of the numerous actions to put down rebellion in that country over many centuries. The objection doesn't recognise that the reason for wearing the Poppy is not a celebration of war or victory in war, it is an act of remembrance for lives lost in war.
FIFA are in effect endorsing the political objectives of Sinn Fein and the IRA among others by opposing the wearing of the Poppy. Very helpful I'm sure.
Foreverinbluedreams wrote:johnny crossan wrote:Mase wrote:'I mourn their deaths like every other decent person and if the Poppy was a symbol only for the lost souls of World War I and II I would wear one.
I want to make that 100% clear .You must understand this. ...But the Poppy is used to remember victims of other conflicts since 1945 and this is where the problem starts for me.
There is no difference, it's a political statement about the British oppressor in Ireland and McLean and his ilk could just as well have used the 1916 Easter Rising as a date or indeed a time after any of the numerous actions to put down rebellion in that country over many centuries. The objection doesn't recognise that the reason for wearing the Poppy is not a celebration of war or victory in war, it is an act of remembrance for lives lost in war.
FIFA are in effect endorsing the political objectives of Sinn Fein and the IRA among others by opposing the wearing of the Poppy. Very helpful I'm sure.
That's some leap JC.
Foreverinbluedreams wrote:johnny crossan wrote:Mase wrote:'I mourn their deaths like every other decent person and if the Poppy was a symbol only for the lost souls of World War I and II I would wear one.
I want to make that 100% clear .You must understand this. ...But the Poppy is used to remember victims of other conflicts since 1945 and this is where the problem starts for me.
There is no difference, it's a political statement about the British oppressor in Ireland and McLean and his ilk could just as well have used the 1916 Easter Rising as a date or indeed a time after any of the numerous actions to put down rebellion in that country over many centuries. The objection doesn't recognise that the reason for wearing the Poppy is not a celebration of war or victory in war, it is an act of remembrance for lives lost in war.
FIFA are in effect endorsing the political objectives of Sinn Fein and the IRA among others by opposing the wearing of the Poppy. Very helpful I'm sure.
That's some leap JC.
johnny crossan wrote:Foreverinbluedreams wrote:johnny crossan wrote:Mase wrote:'I mourn their deaths like every other decent person and if the Poppy was a symbol only for the lost souls of World War I and II I would wear one.
I want to make that 100% clear .You must understand this. ...But the Poppy is used to remember victims of other conflicts since 1945 and this is where the problem starts for me.
There is no difference, it's a political statement about the British oppressor in Ireland and McLean and his ilk could just as well have used the 1916 Easter Rising as a date or indeed a time after any of the numerous actions to put down rebellion in that country over many centuries. The objection doesn't recognise that the reason for wearing the Poppy is not a celebration of war or victory in war, it is an act of remembrance for lives lost in war.
FIFA are in effect endorsing the political objectives of Sinn Fein and the IRA among others by opposing the wearing of the Poppy. Very helpful I'm sure.
That's some leap JC.
No leap, not even a skip - the eternally reliable modus ponens conveys any rational being to this conclusion.
Foreverinbluedreams wrote:johnny crossan wrote:Foreverinbluedreams wrote:johnny crossan wrote:Mase wrote:'I mourn their deaths like every other decent person and if the Poppy was a symbol only for the lost souls of World War I and II I would wear one.
I want to make that 100% clear .You must understand this. ...But the Poppy is used to remember victims of other conflicts since 1945 and this is where the problem starts for me.
There is no difference, it's a political statement about the British oppressor in Ireland and McLean and his ilk could just as well have used the 1916 Easter Rising as a date or indeed a time after any of the numerous actions to put down rebellion in that country over many centuries. The objection doesn't recognise that the reason for wearing the Poppy is not a celebration of war or victory in war, it is an act of remembrance for lives lost in war.
FIFA are in effect endorsing the political objectives of Sinn Fein and the IRA among others by opposing the wearing of the Poppy. Very helpful I'm sure.
That's some leap JC.
No leap, not even a skip - the eternally reliable modus ponens conveys any rational being to this conclusion.
Scary that a seemingly well educated and intelligent bloke like yourself sees that as a rational conclusion.
Justified logic wrote:I would gladly take a 7pt deduction if it meant England not going to that shithole Russia.
Mase wrote:Would be interesting to get the opinions of people that aren't English on this.
Foreverinbluedreams wrote:Republic of Ireland charged by FIFA.
I wouldn't mind I was at that game when the 1916 badge was worn and the first I heard about it was on this thread.
Rats out!
CTID Hants wrote:Foreverinbluedreams wrote:Republic of Ireland charged by FIFA.
I wouldn't mind I was at that game when the 1916 badge was worn and the first I heard about it was on this thread.
Rats out!
I didn't know about it either until today but apparently the FA & SFA cited it in their argument to FIFA & only now are FIFA taking action despite the game being played 6 months or so ago!!
Justified logic wrote:Time was when the poppy symbolised - to me at least - the sacrifices made in WW1 and WW2, two wars in which volunteers and then conscripts fought to defend the country against an aggressor that was attacking and would have invaded us. The poppy seems to have changed now to include the volunteer war dead in all our own aggressive wars of invasion and occupation so to my mind it has become politicised which is why I no longer wear it, just having respect for 11am on 11th November - and not the fucking military parades on the nearest non-workday Sunday.
BlueinBosnia wrote:Why not just wear a black armband? Everyone knows what it will symbolize. I don't see anything good in the poppy symbol being (in my opinion) 'Disneyfied' in this way. In fact, I think it's quite demeaning to the symbol and everything that it originally stood for (discreet commemoration and fundraising for those affected by war). This poppy-or-bust attitude roused in the masses by the media is exactly the same mentality that was fostered in the young who were so easily led out to the fields in the First World War, and it's incredibly sad to see.
On the same day as England play Scotland, Wales play Serbia. Serbia's equivalent of the poppy is Natalie's Ramonda, a flower used to symbolize simultaneously the sacrifices of Serbia's war dead and the salvation of the Serbian Kingdom in and (partially) through the Great War. I fully expect that, were the poppy symbol to be allowed for England and Scotland, and therefore, de facto for Wales, then so should this.
That could potentially kick off all sorts of complaints from within the region.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Scatman and 98 guests