Here is the place to talk about all things city and football!
by Dameerto » Tue Jan 03, 2017 1:49 pm
Just on the off chance anyone from his 'camp' reads the boards:
We all know you were referring to the strong vocal support of the AWAY FANS when you mentioned ten against twelve and I hope you clarify this for the FA since they decided to stick their fat whiskey soaked nose into it.
VIVA EL CITIES
"The adjudicatory chamber of the Ethics Committee ... has banned Mr Joseph S. Blatter ... for eight years and Mr Michel Platini ... for eight years from all football-related activities (administrative, sports or any other) on a national and international level. The bans come into force immediately." - 21/12/2015
-

Dameerto
- Donated to the site

- Allison's Big Fat Cigar
-
- Posts: 18703
- Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2009 7:08 pm
- Supporter of: El City
- My favourite player is: Sergio Forwardo
by Wonderwall » Tue Jan 03, 2017 1:51 pm
Or his finger slipped and he meant to put 12....I mean 11 .... see its easily done

-

Wonderwall
- Colin Bell's Football Brain
-
- Posts: 28923
- Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 2:58 pm
- Location: Sale
- Supporter of: Gods own team
by Peter Doherty (AGAIG) » Tue Jan 03, 2017 2:12 pm
10 against 12 and yet our players shake Mason's hand at the end.
-
Peter Doherty (AGAIG)
- Donated to the site

- Shaun Goater's 103 Goals
-
- Posts: 7170
- Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2011 1:15 am
- Location: Manchester
- Supporter of: MCFC
- My favourite player is: Johan Cruyff
by PeterParker » Tue Jan 03, 2017 2:17 pm
Context?
What happend?
-

PeterParker
- Pellegrini's Hoodie
-
- Posts: 22903
- Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 12:36 pm
- Location: Bucharest
- Supporter of: The Blue Moon blues
- My favourite player is: King Mike
by Dameerto » Tue Jan 03, 2017 2:33 pm
PeterParker wrote:Context?
What happend?
Deleted instagram post talking about 10 against 12 which the (decrepid ancient and well past retirement age) FA have asked him to explain, he has until 5pm tonight. Clearly referencing their strong away following though. There's nothing else it could have been about.
VIVA EL CITIES
"The adjudicatory chamber of the Ethics Committee ... has banned Mr Joseph S. Blatter ... for eight years and Mr Michel Platini ... for eight years from all football-related activities (administrative, sports or any other) on a national and international level. The bans come into force immediately." - 21/12/2015
-

Dameerto
- Donated to the site

- Allison's Big Fat Cigar
-
- Posts: 18703
- Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2009 7:08 pm
- Supporter of: El City
- My favourite player is: Sergio Forwardo
by carolina-blue » Tue Jan 03, 2017 2:40 pm
Dameerto wrote:PeterParker wrote:Context?
What happend?
Deleted instagram post talking about 10 against 12 which the (decrepid ancient and well past retirement age) FA have asked him to explain. Clearly referencing their strong away following though. There's nothing else it could have been about.
It could be he meant having gone down to10
Men coupled with Burnleys fast speed of play
And intricate slick passing
It seemed like they had an Extra Man on the field !!& it was like we were playing against 12 men ,
-
carolina-blue
- Rosler's Grandad Bombed The Swamp
-
- Posts: 3749
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 7:55 pm
by PeterParker » Tue Jan 03, 2017 2:46 pm
Dameerto wrote:PeterParker wrote:Context?
What happend?
Deleted instagram post talking about 10 against 12 which the (decrepid ancient and well past retirement age) FA have asked him to explain, he has until 5pm tonight. Clearly referencing their strong away following though. There's nothing else it could have been about.
Cheers.
What a bunch of clowns. Clearly, no agenda against us.
-

PeterParker
- Pellegrini's Hoodie
-
- Posts: 22903
- Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 12:36 pm
- Location: Bucharest
- Supporter of: The Blue Moon blues
- My favourite player is: King Mike
by zuricity » Tue Jan 03, 2017 2:48 pm
PeterParker wrote:Dameerto wrote:PeterParker wrote:Context?
What happend?
Deleted instagram post talking about 10 against 12 which the (decrepid ancient and well past retirement age) FA have asked him to explain, he has until 5pm tonight. Clearly referencing their strong away following though. There's nothing else it could have been about.
Cheers.
What a bunch of clowns. Clearly, no agenda against us.
Clearly the Russians have infested his account. It's so easy these days.
"Well I'll go to the foot of our stairs."
-
zuricity
- Allison's Big Fat Cigar
-
- Posts: 18312
- Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 10:54 pm
- Location: Zuerich,ch
by Tokyo Blue » Tue Jan 03, 2017 2:49 pm
This predictive text/autocorrect is a bugger, you know.
Your right leg I like; I've got nothing against your right leg. The trouble is neither have you.
-
Tokyo Blue
- Donated to the site

- Bert Trautmann's Neck
-
- Posts: 12339
- Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 2:33 am
by Tokyo Blue » Tue Jan 03, 2017 2:50 pm
Typo. Tthese fiddly little keyboarrs on mobile devicesd are toop small for a grown mann's fiungers. Who hasn't pressed the wwrong keyu sometimesd?
Your right leg I like; I've got nothing against your right leg. The trouble is neither have you.
-
Tokyo Blue
- Donated to the site

- Bert Trautmann's Neck
-
- Posts: 12339
- Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 2:33 am
by Original Dub » Tue Jan 03, 2017 2:55 pm
Fucking ridiculous shit, the FA going after him on something that can be interpreted in many ways.
It's the equivalent of the media push to get mancini charged for waving an "imaginary card".
If it's imaginary, how the fuck do you know it's a card??
How can they prove what he meant? It's fucking stupid to even ask him.
Idiots on a fucking crusade.
If they were a proper organisation they'd be calling having a full review of the refereeing system in premier league and asking why it's getting worse instead of better.
You know, going after the problem, instead of those pointing the problem out.
Cunts.
-
Original Dub
-
by Slim » Tue Jan 03, 2017 3:08 pm
I hope he comes out and says:
"well normally you have 11 players on the pitch and if one gets sent off you only have 10, I thought it was pretty clear"
Then when they ask about the number 12, he can reply:
"The ref was a bent cunt who was obviously angling for Burnley to get something from the game, so much so he may as well have worn a Burnley shirt with the number 12 on the back, what you think we didn't fucking notice you bent FA cunts?"
-

Slim
- Anna Connell's Vision
-
- Posts: 30344
- Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2006 3:57 am
- Location: Perth
by Peter Doherty (AGAIG) » Tue Jan 03, 2017 3:21 pm
Original Dub wrote:Fucking ridiculous shit, the FA going after him on something that can be interpreted in many ways.
It's the equivalent of the media push to get mancini charged for waving an "imaginary card".
If it's imaginary, how the fuck do you know it's a card??
How can they prove what he meant? It's fucking stupid to even ask him.
Idiots on a fucking crusade.
If they were a proper organisation they'd be calling having a full review of the refereeing system in premier league and asking why it's getting worse instead of better.
You know, going after the problem, instead of those pointing the problem out.
Cunts.
That's brilliant.
-
Peter Doherty (AGAIG)
- Donated to the site

- Shaun Goater's 103 Goals
-
- Posts: 7170
- Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2011 1:15 am
- Location: Manchester
- Supporter of: MCFC
- My favourite player is: Johan Cruyff
by Wonderwall » Tue Jan 03, 2017 3:30 pm
Clearly a typo because if he was meaning the officiating of the game it would be 10 against 15.
-

Wonderwall
- Colin Bell's Football Brain
-
- Posts: 28923
- Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 2:58 pm
- Location: Sale
- Supporter of: Gods own team
by Original Dub » Tue Jan 03, 2017 3:38 pm
Sky have just decided that Sagna was talking about Lee Mason, before the investigation has been concluded, or indeed the player himself has responded.
That's strange isn't it?
http://www.skysports.com/football/news/ ... ason-to-fa
-
Original Dub
-
by Wonderwall » Tue Jan 03, 2017 3:43 pm
It was pretty stupid of him TBH. Emotive post and a good example of why players should not be anywhere near social.media on match days.
He has until 6pm on Friday to respond. We kick off at 7.45!
Will he get a ban? If so get the response in now so he is only banned for the cup game.
-

Wonderwall
- Colin Bell's Football Brain
-
- Posts: 28923
- Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 2:58 pm
- Location: Sale
- Supporter of: Gods own team
by Slim » Tue Jan 03, 2017 3:48 pm
So they saw Mason's bias too?
I can only assume if they got there before Sagna clarified it.
-

Slim
- Anna Connell's Vision
-
- Posts: 30344
- Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2006 3:57 am
- Location: Perth
by Original Dub » Tue Jan 03, 2017 4:05 pm
Slim wrote:So they saw Mason's bias too?
I can only assume if they got there before Sagna clarified it.
Ssn just now:
"And mike dean wasn't the only referee that managers were unhappy with... a very clearly upset jurgen klopp wasn't happy with the performance of anthony taylor..."
So they know klopp was agitated because of the referee but pep is just being weird and there's no explanation?
Again. Odd.
Anyway, this has to be thrown out because the media have already stated that sagna was talking about Lee Mason, thus soiling the investigation.
-
Original Dub
-
by carolina-blue » Tue Jan 03, 2017 4:35 pm
Slim wrote:So they saw Mason's bias too?
I can only assume if they got there before Sagna clarified it.
Great point Slim
Just another ssn witch hunt
-
carolina-blue
- Rosler's Grandad Bombed The Swamp
-
- Posts: 3749
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 7:55 pm
by london blue 2 » Tue Jan 03, 2017 4:45 pm
Sagna you legend. Just tell them to go fuck themselves.
Can't wait for peps next presser
-
london blue 2
- Paul Power's Tash
-
- Posts: 10339
- Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 10:32 am
- Location: london
- Supporter of: MCFC
Return to The Maine Football forum
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: blues-clues, blues2win, branny, carl_feedthegoat, CTID Hants, dave watson's perm, dick dastardley, Harry Dowd scored, Hazy2, HBlock Cripple, Indianablue, john@staustell, nottsblue, PeterParker, salford city, Sideshow Bob, Stan, stevefromdonny and 158 guests