South Stand Balti wrote:Mikhail Chigorin wrote:South Stand Balti wrote:Mikhail Chigorin wrote:South Stand Balti wrote:I wonder who Ted would vote for. I'm sure he wanted to get rid of Silva.
He loved Colin Bell; I'm certain he would have voted for him.
I bet it would have taken a mega long post for him to get to that conclusion.
After the length of the post I just made for David Silva, I'm the last person to criticise him for doing the same
A game full of fascinating characters. Alekhine and Fischer being two of them. Richard Reti I like too though he was as much a theorist as a chess player. I had high hopes of Michael Adams a few years ago but he didn't quite reach the very top.
In the 1980s there was an emerging crop of young British players who were sponsored/subsidised by a millionaire (can't remember his name now) and this gave them the freedom to concentrate on chess full time. As a result of this, for a brief period, we became the 'de facto' second strongest chess nation in the world, after the Russians.
Michael Adams came in right at the tail end of this and there were very high hopes held for him but, now that he's in his mid forties, I suppose his time has peaked and, unfortunately, passed.
I've always liked players with volatile, combinational styles who could just as easily lose badly, as win brilliantly. I also like Gambit openings, or double-edged ones which give a cut-throat approach to every game and I suffered many a loss, with black, by playing the Latvian defence and trying to prove it was sound.
Happy/unhappy days !!