Original Dub wrote:Justified logic wrote:Original Dub wrote:carl_feedthegoat wrote:Original Dub wrote:
Wow, maybe it's NOT all in our heads...
I always remember years back when me and you mentioned this and we were laughed at.......can you remember the guilty cunts names?
LookMum was number fuckign one..who were the rest?
Well that was definitely the obvious one, but since he left, there has been one or two who have stepped in when we get robbed to say it has nothing to do with officiating. Or that e should be able to win every game with or without the officials !
That troll Phips is at it in this very thread. But he's a fucking blow in and doesn't understand the game itself, let alone the establishment and the protection they have.
The best bit is being called a conspiracy theorist when there's video evidence each time. That's some thick shit right there. Mind blowing stuff.
Incompetence, bias or conspiracy, you takes your choice.
Exactly. All could be sorted with video replay.
Not really. Obviously bad decisions could be eliminated by video replay, just as bad goal/no-goal decisions have been eliminated by goal-line technology. However potentially contentious decisions (handballs, fouls, offsides, penalty box) would still be open to interpretation and hence bias or conspiracy unless there were a very clear ruling that if the decision is uncertain it's not given, aka innocent until proven guilty. However it would depend how video replays were brought in and how much of the game they would cover - not much proposed at the moment.