FA cup winners 2006 wrote:even his goal on Tuesday night went in off the bar. A goal where he had stopped and set himself, the ball rolled back to him perfectly, 12 yards out, open goal and he thumps it off the underside of the bar.
Original Dub wrote:Tap ins, inside of the post and underside of the bar don't really count Tokyo.
Pipe down ffs
freshie wrote:sheblue wrote:freshie wrote:Sergio and Jesus miss sitters but nobody complains about them. I'm sick of it
Nobody complains? Are you sure.
There are loads complaining about everyone.
There's even somestupid cunts giving out about Ederson recently.
Silva even gets it from the thicker variety.
It's all there in writing, plain to see.
Ederson? On this forum? Well in that case the highlighted words say it all
ruralblue wrote:freshie wrote:sheblue wrote:freshie wrote:Sergio and Jesus miss sitters but nobody complains about them. I'm sick of it
Nobody complains? Are you sure.
There are loads complaining about everyone.
There's even somestupid cunts giving out about Ederson recently.
Silva even gets it from the thicker variety.
It's all there in writing, plain to see.
Ederson? On this forum? Well in that case the highlighted words say it all
I'm Ederson!
Tokyo Blue wrote:FA cup winners 2006 wrote:even his goal on Tuesday night went in off the bar. A goal where he had stopped and set himself, the ball rolled back to him perfectly, 12 yards out, open goal and he thumps it off the underside of the bar.
You're picking at stuff that means absolutely nothing at all. Does it count less if it goes in off the bar or something?
ruralblue wrote:freshie wrote:sheblue wrote:freshie wrote:Sergio and Jesus miss sitters but nobody complains about them. I'm sick of it
Nobody complains? Are you sure.
There are loads complaining about everyone.
There's even somestupid cunts giving out about Ederson recently.
Silva even gets it from the thicker variety.
It's all there in writing, plain to see.
Ederson? On this forum? Well in that case the highlighted words say it all
I'm Ederson!
Hutch's Shoulder wrote:ruralblue wrote:freshie wrote:sheblue wrote:freshie wrote:Sergio and Jesus miss sitters but nobody complains about them. I'm sick of it
Nobody complains? Are you sure.
There are loads complaining about everyone.
There's even somestupid cunts giving out about Ederson recently.
Silva even gets it from the thicker variety.
It's all there in writing, plain to see.
Ederson? On this forum? Well in that case the highlighted words say it all
I'm Ederson!
No, I’m Ederson
Nigels Tackle wrote:
his ozil impression on saturday was even better!
Nigels Tackle wrote:
his ozil impression on saturday was even better!
Original Dub wrote:Tap ins, inside of the post and underside of the bar don't really count Tokyo.
Pipe down ffs
FA cup winners 2006 wrote:Original Dub wrote:Tap ins, inside of the post and underside of the bar don't really count Tokyo.
Pipe down ffs
Where did i say that. That other poster only highlighted part of my original post. I gave sterling his credit for getting his chances but he misses some simple chances.
Also, in relation to the ball going in of the underside of the bar, of course it matters because he is millimetres away from missing a simple tap in. although it went in, it was still a poor finish. Guaranteed, he costs us points this season because of his poor finishing or his poor final ball.
FA cup winners 2006 wrote:Original Dub wrote:Tap ins, inside of the post and underside of the bar don't really count Tokyo.
Pipe down ffs
Where did i say that. That other poster only highlighted part of my original post. I gave sterling his credit for getting his chances but he misses some simple chances.
Also, in relation to the ball going in of the underside of the bar, of course it matters because he is millimetres away from missing a simple tap in. although it went in, it was still a poor finish. Guaranteed, he costs us points this season because of his poor finishing or his poor final ball.
Original Dub wrote:FA cup winners 2006 wrote:Original Dub wrote:Tap ins, inside of the post and underside of the bar don't really count Tokyo.
Pipe down ffs
Where did i say that. That other poster only highlighted part of my original post. I gave sterling his credit for getting his chances but he misses some simple chances.
Also, in relation to the ball going in of the underside of the bar, of course it matters because he is millimetres away from missing a simple tap in. although it went in, it was still a poor finish. Guaranteed, he costs us points this season because of his poor finishing or his poor final ball.
Firstly, I was referring more to the resident troll than you, but now that you've hit us with such an outstanding post, I'll stick with you.
So it matters if the ball goes in off the bar because it was close to missing?
Also, your "guarantee" is even sillier than the above point - every player will miss chances throughout the season that "could" cost points.
Get real pal.
How many points did KDB cost us last season? Based on your theory...
Wonderwall wrote:Original Dub wrote:FA cup winners 2006 wrote:Original Dub wrote:Tap ins, inside of the post and underside of the bar don't really count Tokyo.
Pipe down ffs
Where did i say that. That other poster only highlighted part of my original post. I gave sterling his credit for getting his chances but he misses some simple chances.
Also, in relation to the ball going in of the underside of the bar, of course it matters because he is millimetres away from missing a simple tap in. although it went in, it was still a poor finish. Guaranteed, he costs us points this season because of his poor finishing or his poor final ball.
Firstly, I was referring more to the resident troll than you, but now that you've hit us with such an outstanding post, I'll stick with you.
So it matters if the ball goes in off the bar because it was close to missing?
Also, your "guarantee" is even sillier than the above point - every player will miss chances throughout the season that "could" cost points.
Get real pal.
How many points did KDB cost us last season? Based on your theory...
It's very simple and quantifiably tangible to say he missed that easy chance or he should have squared for a tap in instead of going for goal etc etc. Sterling offers so much more than that and it just gets glossed over because he is naturally quick.
Opposition full backs are wary of allowing space behind them and often reduce their own attacking threat due to pace of our wide men so they can keep compact and not allow us in behind. Maybe that 2 goals conceded from 7 games is down to our attacking options, first and foremost.
Our midfield maestro's know where our wide men will be instinctively, there is almost a telepathic link because we are so well drilled. Sterling has come on leaps and bounds and will continue to rise under the tutorship of Senor Guardiola.
Original Dub wrote:Wonderwall wrote:Original Dub wrote:FA cup winners 2006 wrote:Original Dub wrote:Tap ins, inside of the post and underside of the bar don't really count Tokyo.
Pipe down ffs
Where did i say that. That other poster only highlighted part of my original post. I gave sterling his credit for getting his chances but he misses some simple chances.
Also, in relation to the ball going in of the underside of the bar, of course it matters because he is millimetres away from missing a simple tap in. although it went in, it was still a poor finish. Guaranteed, he costs us points this season because of his poor finishing or his poor final ball.
Firstly, I was referring more to the resident troll than you, but now that you've hit us with such an outstanding post, I'll stick with you.
So it matters if the ball goes in off the bar because it was close to missing?
Also, your "guarantee" is even sillier than the above point - every player will miss chances throughout the season that "could" cost points.
Get real pal.
How many points did KDB cost us last season? Based on your theory...
It's very simple and quantifiably tangible to say he missed that easy chance or he should have squared for a tap in instead of going for goal etc etc. Sterling offers so much more than that and it just gets glossed over because he is naturally quick.
Opposition full backs are wary of allowing space behind them and often reduce their own attacking threat due to pace of our wide men so they can keep compact and not allow us in behind. Maybe that 2 goals conceded from 7 games is down to our attacking options, first and foremost.
Our midfield maestro's know where our wide men will be instinctively, there is almost a telepathic link because we are so well drilled. Sterling has come on leaps and bounds and will continue to rise under the tutorship of Senor Guardiola.
That's exactly it.
Some of us are watching. I wonder will he ever win POTY. Or, if he wins it by a small margin, will any of our fans say it doesn't count as much because he nearly didn't win it?
![]()
![]()
Original Dub wrote:Wonderwall wrote:Original Dub wrote:FA cup winners 2006 wrote:Original Dub wrote:Tap ins, inside of the post and underside of the bar don't really count Tokyo.
Pipe down ffs
Where did i say that. That other poster only highlighted part of my original post. I gave sterling his credit for getting his chances but he misses some simple chances.
Also, in relation to the ball going in of the underside of the bar, of course it matters because he is millimetres away from missing a simple tap in. although it went in, it was still a poor finish. Guaranteed, he costs us points this season because of his poor finishing or his poor final ball.
Firstly, I was referring more to the resident troll than you, but now that you've hit us with such an outstanding post, I'll stick with you.
So it matters if the ball goes in off the bar because it was close to missing?
Also, your "guarantee" is even sillier than the above point - every player will miss chances throughout the season that "could" cost points.
Get real pal.
How many points did KDB cost us last season? Based on your theory...
It's very simple and quantifiably tangible to say he missed that easy chance or he should have squared for a tap in instead of going for goal etc etc. Sterling offers so much more than that and it just gets glossed over because he is naturally quick.
Opposition full backs are wary of allowing space behind them and often reduce their own attacking threat due to pace of our wide men so they can keep compact and not allow us in behind. Maybe that 2 goals conceded from 7 games is down to our attacking options, first and foremost.
Our midfield maestro's know where our wide men will be instinctively, there is almost a telepathic link because we are so well drilled. Sterling has come on leaps and bounds and will continue to rise under the tutorship of Senor Guardiola.
That's exactly it.
Some of us are watching. I wonder will he ever win POTY. Or, if he wins it by a small margin, will any of our fans say it doesn't count as much because he nearly didn't win it?
![]()
![]()
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Bluemoon4610, dick dastardley, Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot], Nickyboy, Plain Speaking and 179 guests