Dimples wrote:Swales4ever wrote:Really hope we both are wrong, but can't help but feeling that nasty sense down there.
Originally thought we would have been given a level playing field until the derby, but this appointment, after all those cries about the need to stop City.... very troubling, must say it again.
I think he is just a bad ref so nothing suspicious there until I see who the rags got - one of their biggest supporters.
So far the playing field has been level we will know after the Rags game if it will stay that way.
I think it will I reckon the club sorted this out in the background over the summer.
let me be clear, Mate: this is #1 issue where I am more desperate to be proven a paranoid cunt. and fact that, so many highly respectable voices seems fairly camped on the "just a bad ref" stance is quite relieving to me.
however, and not for the sake of it, I maintain my convincement that Oliver is the opposite of a bad referee, yet remembering when in his early appearances in the Premiership I was hoping that he had been appointed to City as much as possible.
more conclusively, imho, I really do not think anyone could be as that bad as to conduct himself they way he did on the occasion of the "Walker fictional elbow", spotted right in front of HIM. if not on evident purpose.
Either way, really hope I'm gonna proven a paranoid cunt on sunday occasion.