Beefymcfc wrote:I've still not seen this Halsey article, have the powers that be had it sensored?
Foreverinbluedreams wrote:Beefymcfc wrote:I've still not seen this Halsey article, have the powers that be had it sensored?
There's nothing new Beefy, it's just the stuff that Halsey came out with a couple of years back that was swept under the carpet.
Original Dub wrote:Douglas Higginbottom wrote:Peter Doherty (AGAIG) wrote:Watch on youtube.com
WOW. That was unbelievable. Mike bloody Riley. 8 pens in 8 games for the scum at the swamp.
Wins it for me. The rag fans at the SM's session will love me for it. or maybe they will bring it up as well!
It's so blatant it's criminal.
Hey, NigelsTackle - why do you think the decisions in that video didn't really go with arsenal?
Would you say Riley just saw things differently/had a bad day, or would you say he was biased towards united?
Original Dub wrote:Original Dub wrote:Douglas Higginbottom wrote:Peter Doherty (AGAIG) wrote:Watch on youtube.com
WOW. That was unbelievable. Mike bloody Riley. 8 pens in 8 games for the scum at the swamp.
Wins it for me. The rag fans at the SM's session will love me for it. or maybe they will bring it up as well!
It's so blatant it's criminal.
Hey, NigelsTackle - why do you think the decisions in that video didn't really go with arsenal?
Would you say Riley just saw things differently/had a bad day, or would you say he was biased towards united?
Whenever you're ready to grow a pair of balls and answer the question Negative Nige
Original Dub wrote:You're comparing any potential bias in officiating to a conspiracy about the moon landing now Nige?
Poor cunt.
Nigels Tackle wrote:Original Dub wrote:You're comparing any potential bias in officiating to a conspiracy about the moon landing now Nige?
Poor cunt.
some of the more intelligent folk on here may take the time to read the link i posted...
Original Dub wrote:Nigels Tackle wrote:Original Dub wrote:You're comparing any potential bias in officiating to a conspiracy about the moon landing now Nige?
Poor cunt.
some of the more intelligent folk on here may take the time to read the link i posted...
Oh I read that piece alright, don't you worry about that.
So you are letting this "Phil" answer the question I asked YOU? How did you find "Phil", Nige? Did you have to search online for "conspiracy theories on Mike Riley" or something similar?
That's you in a nut shell. You call people out for their observations and then use someone else's as yours?
You're the most naive cunt on here and I think it's fair to say that's common knowledge. This hasn't got anything to do with Moon Landings or the All Knowing Phil, so grow a pair of balls and answer the question I asked YOU.
Nigels Tackle wrote:Original Dub wrote:Nigels Tackle wrote:Original Dub wrote:You're comparing any potential bias in officiating to a conspiracy about the moon landing now Nige?
Poor cunt.
some of the more intelligent folk on here may take the time to read the link i posted...
Oh I read that piece alright, don't you worry about that.
So you are letting this "Phil" answer the question I asked YOU? How did you find "Phil", Nige? Did you have to search online for "conspiracy theories on Mike Riley" or something similar?
That's you in a nut shell. You call people out for their observations and then use someone else's as yours?
You're the most naive cunt on here and I think it's fair to say that's common knowledge. This hasn't got anything to do with Moon Landings or the All Knowing Phil, so grow a pair of balls and answer the question I asked YOU.
‘riley 50th game’ was the google search:
https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=riley ... ent=safari
the guy presents a BALANCED, fact based argument. i know that you find those kind of things hard to deal with.
read any teams forum and i guarantee that there will be threads alleging bias. cutemanc’s opposition view threads often contain allegations that we are favoured by referees.
would be lovely if you could explain how your theory works, with details of all the agents involved, the hierarchy of bias and how all the people necessary to make it work over all these years haven’t had their cover broken.
City64 wrote:Nigels Tackle wrote:Original Dub wrote:Nigels Tackle wrote:Original Dub wrote:You're comparing any potential bias in officiating to a conspiracy about the moon landing now Nige?
Poor cunt.
some of the more intelligent folk on here may take the time to read the link i posted...
Oh I read that piece alright, don't you worry about that.
So you are letting this "Phil" answer the question I asked YOU? How did you find "Phil", Nige? Did you have to search online for "conspiracy theories on Mike Riley" or something similar?
That's you in a nut shell. You call people out for their observations and then use someone else's as yours?
You're the most naive cunt on here and I think it's fair to say that's common knowledge. This hasn't got anything to do with Moon Landings or the All Knowing Phil, so grow a pair of balls and answer the question I asked YOU.
‘riley 50th game’ was the google search:
https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=riley ... ent=safari
the guy presents a BALANCED, fact based argument. i know that you find those kind of things hard to deal with.
read any teams forum and i guarantee that there will be threads alleging bias. cutemanc’s opposition view threads often contain allegations that we are favoured by referees.
would be lovely if you could explain how your theory works, with details of all the agents involved, the hierarchy of bias and how all the people necessary to make it work over all these years haven’t had their cover broken.
Nutty Nige has fairies at the bottom of his garden ..........
Nigels Tackle wrote:Original Dub wrote:Nigels Tackle wrote:Original Dub wrote:You're comparing any potential bias in officiating to a conspiracy about the moon landing now Nige?
Poor cunt.
some of the more intelligent folk on here may take the time to read the link i posted...
Oh I read that piece alright, don't you worry about that.
So you are letting this "Phil" answer the question I asked YOU? How did you find "Phil", Nige? Did you have to search online for "conspiracy theories on Mike Riley" or something similar?
That's you in a nut shell. You call people out for their observations and then use someone else's as yours?
You're the most naive cunt on here and I think it's fair to say that's common knowledge. This hasn't got anything to do with Moon Landings or the All Knowing Phil, so grow a pair of balls and answer the question I asked YOU.
‘riley 50th game’ was the google search:
https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=riley ... ent=safari
the guy presents a BALANCED, fact based argument. i know that you find those kind of things hard to deal with.
read any teams forum and i guarantee that there will be threads alleging bias. cutemanc’s opposition view threads often contain allegations that we are favoured by referees.
would be lovely if you could explain how your theory works, with details of all the agents involved, the hierarchy of bias and how all the people necessary to make it work over all these years haven’t had their cover broken.
carl_feedthegoat wrote:An ex top referee who refused a payoff to shut the fuck up has already said there is agendas and Bias in the refereeing department against certain players/ clubs ( words to that effect).
By all means diss those of us who already knew this , but to ignore a fuckign ex top referree who says the same thing ?????
Whose barmy again ?
Nigels Tackle wrote:carl_feedthegoat wrote:An ex top referee who refused a payoff to shut the fuck up has already said there is agendas and Bias in the refereeing department against certain players/ clubs ( words to that effect).
By all means diss those of us who already knew this , but to ignore a fuckign ex top referree who says the same thing ?????
Whose barmy again ?
with fans of other clubs claiming we’re beneficiaries of these kind of decisions...
Nigels Tackle wrote:carl_feedthegoat wrote:An ex top referee who refused a payoff to shut the fuck up has already said there is agendas and Bias in the refereeing department against certain players/ clubs ( words to that effect).
By all means diss those of us who already knew this , but to ignore a fuckign ex top referree who says the same thing ?????
Whose barmy again ?
with fans of other clubs claiming we’re beneficiaries of these kind of decisions...
Original Dub wrote:Nigels Tackle wrote:carl_feedthegoat wrote:An ex top referee who refused a payoff to shut the fuck up has already said there is agendas and Bias in the refereeing department against certain players/ clubs ( words to that effect).
By all means diss those of us who already knew this , but to ignore a fuckign ex top referree who says the same thing ?????
Whose barmy again ?
with fans of other clubs claiming we’re beneficiaries of these kind of decisions...
So now you're admitting that there may be bias in officiating, but that we're not the only club?
This is getting interesting...
Nigels Tackle wrote:Original Dub wrote:Nigels Tackle wrote:carl_feedthegoat wrote:An ex top referee who refused a payoff to shut the fuck up has already said there is agendas and Bias in the refereeing department against certain players/ clubs ( words to that effect).
By all means diss those of us who already knew this , but to ignore a fuckign ex top referree who says the same thing ?????
Whose barmy again ?
with fans of other clubs claiming we’re beneficiaries of these kind of decisions...
So now you're admitting that there may be bias in officiating, but that we're not the only club?
This is getting interesting...
shit. royally rumbled. the premier league is just a football version of wwe...
Nigels Tackle wrote:it’s not bias. it’s gross incompetence. as i have said on countless occasions, the referees in england simply aren’t up to the job. they simply haven’t been able to keep up with the pace that the game has evolved at.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: city72, Google [Bot], mr_nool, salford city and 115 guests