Peter Doherty (AGAIG) wrote:Beefy, she's a bitter nutcase. She has a history of it.
Makes sense mate. Never heard of her and totally understandable she gets stick. Not because she's a woman, just because she comes out with claptrap like that.
Peter Doherty (AGAIG) wrote:Beefy, she's a bitter nutcase. She has a history of it.
Beefymcfc wrote:Peter Doherty (AGAIG) wrote:Beefy, she's a bitter nutcase. She has a history of it.
Makes sense mate. Never heard of her and totally understandable she gets stick. Not because she's a woman, just because she comes out with claptrap like that.
Nigels Tackle wrote:Beefymcfc wrote:Peter Doherty (AGAIG) wrote:Beefy, she's a bitter nutcase. She has a history of it.
Makes sense mate. Never heard of her and totally understandable she gets stick. Not because she's a woman, just because she comes out with claptrap like that.
guaranteed she’d go all serena williams on you if you called her out
Original Dub wrote:https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/45492477
Sterling under pressure from rashford now.
Hutch's Shoulder wrote:Original Dub wrote:https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/45492477
Sterling under pressure from rashford now.
'He has had a mixed opening to the season at United, playing just 122 minutes in all competitions, not starting since the opening game against Leicester and getting sent off for thrusting his head at Phil Bardsley at Burnley' - that's not mixed, its pure crap![]()
. He does have qualities but this over-hyping is not helping him.
nottsblue wrote:Seen an article today in the Sun about FFP rearing its head again. Apparently clubs are to be limited to a net spend of £90M per season. The headline includes us and PSG. No surprise there.
But the last laugh is now on us as with the Academy now bearing fruit, it isn't us who are at the risk of falling foul of this.
mr_nool wrote:nottsblue wrote:Seen an article today in the Sun about FFP rearing its head again. Apparently clubs are to be limited to a net spend of £90M per season. The headline includes us and PSG. No surprise there.
But the last laugh is now on us as with the Academy now bearing fruit, it isn't us who are at the risk of falling foul of this.
The Aguero situation could be a problem and perhaps the Fernandinho one as well. Apart from that, I think we are pretty well set and won't need any huge acquisitions in the next few seasons.
nottsblue wrote:mr_nool wrote:nottsblue wrote:Seen an article today in the Sun about FFP rearing its head again. Apparently clubs are to be limited to a net spend of £90M per season. The headline includes us and PSG. No surprise there.
But the last laugh is now on us as with the Academy now bearing fruit, it isn't us who are at the risk of falling foul of this.
The Aguero situation could be a problem and perhaps the Fernandinho one as well. Apart from that, I think we are pretty well set and won't need any huge acquisitions in the next few seasons.
Think a replacement for Fernandinho will be in the region of £50M. Aguero on the other hand.
mr_nool wrote:nottsblue wrote:mr_nool wrote:nottsblue wrote:Seen an article today in the Sun about FFP rearing its head again. Apparently clubs are to be limited to a net spend of £90M per season. The headline includes us and PSG. No surprise there.
But the last laugh is now on us as with the Academy now bearing fruit, it isn't us who are at the risk of falling foul of this.
The Aguero situation could be a problem and perhaps the Fernandinho one as well. Apart from that, I think we are pretty well set and won't need any huge acquisitions in the next few seasons.
Think a replacement for Fernandinho will be in the region of £50M. Aguero on the other hand.
I meant more in the case that we need to replace two or more of our spine in one window/season.
nottsblue wrote:Seen an article today in the Sun about FFP rearing its head again. Apparently clubs are to be limited to a net spend of £90M per season. The headline includes us and PSG. No surprise there.
But the last laugh is now on us as with the Academy now bearing fruit, it isn't us who are at the risk of falling foul of this.
london blue 2 wrote:Don't like this piece from the BBC. Basically our attendance numbers are bullshit.
Rags on the other hand....
Football club attendances: Are fans getting the full picture? - http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/45158878
Original Dub wrote:london blue 2 wrote:Don't like this piece from the BBC. Basically our attendance numbers are bullshit.
Rags on the other hand....
Football club attendances: Are fans getting the full picture? - http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/45158878
The BBC are very selective in their "news" pieces. They're just behind the mirror at the moment.
Dameerto wrote:Original Dub wrote:london blue 2 wrote:Don't like this piece from the BBC. Basically our attendance numbers are bullshit.
Rags on the other hand....
Football club attendances: Are fans getting the full picture? - http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/45158878
The BBC are very selective in their "news" pieces. They're just behind the mirror at the moment.
Clubs are compelled (I think by the FA or maybe the Premier League?) to publish 'tickets sold' per game - police are compelled (for health and safety reasons) to keep actual matchday attendance figures. It keeps coming up in the media every now and then, usually to beat us around the head with the discrepancy.
South Stand Balti wrote:Dameerto wrote:Original Dub wrote:london blue 2 wrote:Don't like this piece from the BBC. Basically our attendance numbers are bullshit.
Rags on the other hand....
Football club attendances: Are fans getting the full picture? - http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/45158878
The BBC are very selective in their "news" pieces. They're just behind the mirror at the moment.
Clubs are compelled (I think by the FA or maybe the Premier League?) to publish 'tickets sold' per game - police are compelled (for health and safety reasons) to keep actual matchday attendance figures. It keeps coming up in the media every now and then, usually to beat us around the head with the discrepancy.
Strangely, Merseyside police are not compelled to hold that data and were therefore unable to publish it. The game we played against Southampton was apparently attended by 38k according to the police. I was at that game and there was a lot more than 38k there. One of us is lying.
South Stand Balti wrote:Dameerto wrote:Original Dub wrote:london blue 2 wrote:Don't like this piece from the BBC. Basically our attendance numbers are bullshit.
Rags on the other hand....
Football club attendances: Are fans getting the full picture? - http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/45158878
The BBC are very selective in their "news" pieces. They're just behind the mirror at the moment.
Clubs are compelled (I think by the FA or maybe the Premier League?) to publish 'tickets sold' per game - police are compelled (for health and safety reasons) to keep actual matchday attendance figures. It keeps coming up in the media every now and then, usually to beat us around the head with the discrepancy.
Strangely, Merseyside police are not compelled to hold that data and were therefore unable to publish it. The game we played against Southampton was apparently attended by 38k according to the police. I was at that game and there was a lot more than 38k there. One of us is lying.
nottsblue wrote:South Stand Balti wrote:Dameerto wrote:Original Dub wrote:london blue 2 wrote:Don't like this piece from the BBC. Basically our attendance numbers are bullshit.
Rags on the other hand....
Football club attendances: Are fans getting the full picture? - http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/45158878
The BBC are very selective in their "news" pieces. They're just behind the mirror at the moment.
Clubs are compelled (I think by the FA or maybe the Premier League?) to publish 'tickets sold' per game - police are compelled (for health and safety reasons) to keep actual matchday attendance figures. It keeps coming up in the media every now and then, usually to beat us around the head with the discrepancy.
Strangely, Merseyside police are not compelled to hold that data and were therefore unable to publish it. The game we played against Southampton was apparently attended by 38k according to the police. I was at that game and there was a lot more than 38k there. One of us is lying.
A discrepancy of 15000 or so punters is equivalent to the main stand being completely empty with the rest of the ground full. Be gobsmacked if that was the case.
Average attendances per club
Club (% of capacity) FOI (% of capacity) Difference (% of capacity)
West Ham 55,309 (97%) 42,779* (75%) 12,530 (22%)
Man City 53,274 (97%) 45,792* (83%) 7,482 (14%)
Southampton 29,906 (92%) 25,660 (79%) 4,246 (13%)
Tottenham 61,843 (69%) 58,103 (65%) 3,740 (4%)
Chelsea 40,593 (98%) 37,088** (89%) 3,505 (8%)
Watford 20,319 (95%) 17,171*** (80%) 2,602 (15%)
Man Utd 73,575 (98%) 73,575* (98%) 0 (0%)
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Harry Dowd scored, Mase, Original Dub, Outcast and 566 guests