by carl_feedthegoat » Fri Sep 28, 2018 10:53 pm
Dimples wrote:patrickblue wrote:Outcast wrote:I probably would get salughtered for this, I would rather have Sane over Hazard providing he becomes more consistent
I'd rather have Sane full stop.
+1.
Hazard is 27 and you cannot rely on him. He will down tools if the stars are not aligned to suit him. Done this twice with Chelsea so far.
Sane is 22 and has huge potential. He can be as good as he wants to be. But it appears he also has an attitude issue.
Hazard is to old to change his way now. Sane is young enough to mature. If he does and goes for it he will be better than Hazard.
I think Sanes attitude is more a 'laid back' unintentional one, just part and parcel of his DNA according to reportsf rom Germany.....he certainly doesnt fuckign sulk thats for sure.
When he gets a bollocking from managers for poor displays at least he just goes out the very next game and does better.
I wouldn't swap him for Hazard either.
THEY SAY SWEARING IS DUE TO A LIMITED VOCABULARY. I KNOW THOUSANDS OF WORDS, BUT I STILL PREFER "FUCK OFF" TO "GO AWAY"