Here is the place to talk about all things city and football!
by Niall Quinns Discopants » Sun Jan 31, 2010 4:24 pm
john68 wrote:Pleased as fucking punch...Did what they had to do and got the points.
Made me smile 1....How many times have we watched our team play really well...lose...and we are miserable
This time, we play poorly...Win...and some are miserable.
Maybe it says more about being miserable than City....:-)
Made me smile 2...NQDP sees city play poorly and is positive...Good on'yer Antti mate...Glass half full time???....:-)
Mate, like I said above, I'm always happy when we win. Sure it was not exactly one for the video collection but the lads did what was expected of them and what they are paid to do.
And yeah, beating shit teams with below average performance makes me believe we are on right course. When we start beating sides like these routinely, then we can start serious looking for that top four spot.
Sometimes we're good and sometimes we're bad but when we're good, at least we're much better than we used to be and when we are bad we're just as bad as we always used to be, so that's got to be good hasn't it?
Mark Radcliffe
-

Niall Quinns Discopants
- Donated to the site

- Anna Connell's Vision
-
- Posts: 40255
- Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 1:19 pm
- Location: Deep in the pimp game
- Supporter of: Holistic approach
- My favourite player is: Bishop Magic Don Juan
by carl_feedthegoat » Sun Jan 31, 2010 4:29 pm
Douglas Higginbottom wrote:I find the question at the top isn't the right one. I am delighted with the result but I thought the game was dire, really really poor. So does that mean I am not happy about today's game?
I hear all the stuff about we would have drawn that game a while ago bla bla bla and have to agree we messed up some games up big time so the result today was the absolute priority.
We got the result and hopefully Mancini will again have learned a lot about the team and certain individuals.
AGREED...ANYONE THAT THOUGHT THAT WAS A GOOD DISPLAY BY US IS AWAY WITH THE FAIRIES.
WE WERE DIRE AND IF WE WERE PLAYING ANOTHER EVERTON TYPE TEAM TODAY WE WOULDNT HAVE GOT ANYTHING FROM THE GAME...IN FACT WE WOULD HAVE LOST.
IT WAS A CRAP PERFORMANCE WITH A FEW NICE TOUCHES HERE AND THERE.........THE COMMENTATORS OVER HERE WERE SPOT ON WITH THEIR ANALSIS.
THEY SAY SWEARING IS DUE TO A LIMITED VOCABULARY. I KNOW THOUSANDS OF WORDS, BUT I STILL PREFER "FUCK OFF" TO "GO AWAY"
-
carl_feedthegoat
- Donated to the site

- Anna Connell's Vision
-
- Posts: 33572
- Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2005 2:51 am
- Supporter of: Man City
by Moonchesteri » Sun Jan 31, 2010 4:30 pm
We won, I'm happy. Simple.
-
Moonchesteri
- Donated to the site

- Neil Young's FA Cup Winning Goal
-
- Posts: 11443
- Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 2:58 pm
- Location: Blue moon
- Supporter of: MCFC
by carl_feedthegoat » Sun Jan 31, 2010 4:30 pm
Slim wrote:I am not happy because Kompany and Zabs both went off injured, result was good though.
ARE YOU ONLY ALLOWED TO POST 5 TIMES A MONTH MATE????
THEY SAY SWEARING IS DUE TO A LIMITED VOCABULARY. I KNOW THOUSANDS OF WORDS, BUT I STILL PREFER "FUCK OFF" TO "GO AWAY"
-
carl_feedthegoat
- Donated to the site

- Anna Connell's Vision
-
- Posts: 33572
- Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2005 2:51 am
- Supporter of: Man City
by Niall Quinns Discopants » Sun Jan 31, 2010 4:31 pm
Fidel Castro wrote:Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:Fidel Castro wrote:It was terrible to watch.
Was just as bad as the football we played under Pearce.
that's so fucking ridiculous statement that I don't know what to say really.
It wasn't the best performance ever but to even compare that to Pearce football is laughable. Or just amazing.
The football was just as boring and lacklustre as it was under Pearce. Difference being the one real chance we got today fell to Adebayor, not Corradi.
Ireland readin Adebayors run and giving him inch perfect pass can hardly be described as chance "falling" to Adebyor. Oh, and we scored twice. Just in case you didn't notice. And hit the post. And Ireland was inches away from scoring. And so on.
Sometimes we're good and sometimes we're bad but when we're good, at least we're much better than we used to be and when we are bad we're just as bad as we always used to be, so that's got to be good hasn't it?
Mark Radcliffe
-

Niall Quinns Discopants
- Donated to the site

- Anna Connell's Vision
-
- Posts: 40255
- Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 1:19 pm
- Location: Deep in the pimp game
- Supporter of: Holistic approach
- My favourite player is: Bishop Magic Don Juan
by Slim » Sun Jan 31, 2010 4:36 pm
carl_feedthegoat wrote:Slim wrote:I am not happy because Kompany and Zabs both went off injured, result was good though.
ARE YOU ONLY ALLOWED TO POST 5 TIMES A MONTH MATE????
What, you miss me or something you big fucking shirt lifter? Go peddle your arse in OT, this forum is for football last I checked.
-

Slim
- Anna Connell's Vision
-
- Posts: 30687
- Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2006 3:57 am
- Location: Perth
by carl_feedthegoat » Sun Jan 31, 2010 4:38 pm
Slim wrote:carl_feedthegoat wrote:Slim wrote:I am not happy because Kompany and Zabs both went off injured, result was good though.
ARE YOU ONLY ALLOWED TO POST 5 TIMES A MONTH MATE????
What, you miss me or something you big fucking shirt lifter? Go peddle your arse in OT, this forum is for football last I checked.
LOL...THATS BETTER FUCKTARD.
THEY SAY SWEARING IS DUE TO A LIMITED VOCABULARY. I KNOW THOUSANDS OF WORDS, BUT I STILL PREFER "FUCK OFF" TO "GO AWAY"
-
carl_feedthegoat
- Donated to the site

- Anna Connell's Vision
-
- Posts: 33572
- Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2005 2:51 am
- Supporter of: Man City
by steveo_88 » Sun Jan 31, 2010 4:40 pm
Players playing out of position is really starting to get on my tits. Not just because of Mancini but because of several previous managers as well.
Whats the point in playing Petrov (who has no right foot whatsoever) in the middle or on the right? No crosses into the box which reduces the chances Manu gets up front. When players have special abilities (Petrovs crossing) or natural assetts (Manu's height) why don't we exploit them instead of making it easier for the opponent to defend against us?
I just feel frustrated because if that Pompey shot which hit the woodwork before we scored had gone in i think they could have stolen a point if not walked away with three points altogether, and more dissapointingly DESERVED them!
South Stand Blue

-

steveo_88
- Rosler's Grandad Bombed The Swamp
-
- Posts: 3893
- Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 10:18 pm
- Location: Warrington
- Supporter of: Jesus Navas
- My favourite player is: Eyal Berkovic
by JB » Sun Jan 31, 2010 4:49 pm
A win is a win a win. I'll take a shitty 2-0 win anyday.
-
JB
- Balotelli's Fireworks Party
-
- Posts: 868
- Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 4:10 pm
- Location: Aberdeen
- Supporter of: MCFC
- My favourite player is: Neil Young!
by 10.Goater_Legend » Sun Jan 31, 2010 4:52 pm
Yes result comes first.
-

10.Goater_Legend
- De Jong's Tackle
-
- Posts: 1976
- Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 12:21 am
- Supporter of: City
by Niall Quinns Discopants » Sun Jan 31, 2010 4:54 pm
steveo_88 wrote:Players playing out of position is really starting to get on my tits. Not just because of Mancini but because of several previous managers as well.
Whats the point in playing Petrov (who has no right foot whatsoever) in the middle or on the right? No crosses into the box which reduces the chances Manu gets up front. When players have special abilities (Petrovs crossing) or natural assetts (Manu's height) why don't we exploit them instead of making it easier for the opponent to defend against us?
I just feel frustrated because if that Pompey shot which hit the woodwork before we scored had gone in i think they could have stolen a point if not walked away with three points altogether, and more dissapointingly DESERVED them!
Absolutely ridiculous. First of all, they didn't deserve shit. Second, we never even stepped to second gear. Had they scored one, we would've scord two. Which we did even if they didn't score.
Sometimes we're good and sometimes we're bad but when we're good, at least we're much better than we used to be and when we are bad we're just as bad as we always used to be, so that's got to be good hasn't it?
Mark Radcliffe
-

Niall Quinns Discopants
- Donated to the site

- Anna Connell's Vision
-
- Posts: 40255
- Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 1:19 pm
- Location: Deep in the pimp game
- Supporter of: Holistic approach
- My favourite player is: Bishop Magic Don Juan
by Chinners » Sun Jan 31, 2010 4:54 pm
Re: *** Man City Vs Portsmouth Official Match Thread ***
by Chinners » Sun Jan 31, 2010 4:51 pm
Poor this, worst that. We won, I'm happy with that, sure I'd loved to of seen a better game as well but we can't do that every week, every game. As others have said, we got 3 points which is the main thing, having x amount of games in hand mean jack unless you win them. This and the next few look an excellent chance to do just that.
-

Chinners
- Donated to the site

- Kaptain Kompany's Komposure
-
- Posts: 14262
- Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 12:52 pm
- Location: Hampton Court Palace
- Supporter of: B*ll*x
- My favourite player is: Kun Tueart
-
by Fidel Castro » Sun Jan 31, 2010 4:56 pm
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:Fidel Castro wrote:Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:Fidel Castro wrote:It was terrible to watch.
Was just as bad as the football we played under Pearce.
that's so fucking ridiculous statement that I don't know what to say really.
It wasn't the best performance ever but to even compare that to Pearce football is laughable. Or just amazing.
The football was just as boring and lacklustre as it was under Pearce. Difference being the one real chance we got today fell to Adebayor, not Corradi.
Ireland readin Adebayors run and giving him inch perfect pass can hardly be described as chance "falling" to Adebyor. Oh, and we scored twice. Just in case you didn't notice. And hit the post. And Ireland was inches away from scoring. And so on.
It was a great pass. Never said it wasn't. My point was, if Ireland had given a great pass like that under Pearce, the chance wouldn't have fallen to Ade but Corradi. He would have missed/fallen over.
-

Fidel Castro
- Neil Young's FA Cup Winning Goal
-
- Posts: 11909
- Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 1:22 pm
- Location: Amersfoort, Cheeseland
- Supporter of: City
-
by ENIAM NAM » Sun Jan 31, 2010 4:57 pm
Yes. 41 pts. We are officially safe from relegation and can start thinking about mid table respectability!
-
ENIAM NAM
- Donated to the site

- Kinky's Mazy Dribbles
-
- Posts: 2159
- Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 12:16 pm
by Fidel Castro » Sun Jan 31, 2010 4:58 pm
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:steveo_88 wrote:Players playing out of position is really starting to get on my tits. Not just because of Mancini but because of several previous managers as well.
Whats the point in playing Petrov (who has no right foot whatsoever) in the middle or on the right? No crosses into the box which reduces the chances Manu gets up front. When players have special abilities (Petrovs crossing) or natural assetts (Manu's height) why don't we exploit them instead of making it easier for the opponent to defend against us?
I just feel frustrated because if that Pompey shot which hit the woodwork before we scored had gone in i think they could have stolen a point if not walked away with three points altogether, and more dissapointingly DESERVED them!
Absolutely ridiculous. First of all, they didn't deserve shit. Second, we never even stepped to second gear. Had they scored one, we would've scord two. Which we did even if they didn't score.
It's mystic meg!
-

Fidel Castro
- Neil Young's FA Cup Winning Goal
-
- Posts: 11909
- Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 1:22 pm
- Location: Amersfoort, Cheeseland
- Supporter of: City
-
by Dingus McDouchey » Sun Jan 31, 2010 5:01 pm
steveo_88 wrote:Players playing out of position is really starting to get on my tits. Not just because of Mancini but because of several previous managers as well.
Whats the point in playing Petrov (who has no right foot whatsoever) in the middle or on the right? No crosses into the box which reduces the chances Manu gets up front. When players have special abilities (Petrovs crossing) or natural assetts (Manu's height) why don't we exploit them instead of making it easier for the opponent to defend against us?
I just feel frustrated because if that Pompey shot which hit the woodwork before we scored had gone in i think they could have stolen a point if not walked away with three points altogether, and more dissapointingly DESERVED them!
petrov does two things well when on the right. he plays the cross-field pass, and shoots well from the edge of the box when it's laid off to him.
today there was no pace on the left hand side to make his cross-field ball effective (needs a bellamy). neither was there anyone holding up the ball at the edge of the box to lay it off to him.
i'd rather see him on the left, but if you're gonna play him on the right, he needs help to be effective.
Berbatov wins golden boot, spends following season on the bench while his team loses title on goal difference. Well played, Fergie.
-

Dingus McDouchey
- Donated to the site

- Richard Dunne's Own Goals
-
- Posts: 928
- Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 9:36 pm
by Tokyo Blue » Sun Jan 31, 2010 5:28 pm
To beat today's Portsmouth side you don't have to be Brazil 1970. You have to score more than Portsmouth. Efficiency is what wins Italy World Cups and a lack of it is what wins England precisely fuck all. And even Brazil 1970 didn't play like Brazil 1970 every bloody week.
So yes, I am happy we won.
Your right leg I like; I've got nothing against your right leg. The trouble is neither have you.
-
Tokyo Blue
- Donated to the site

- Bert Trautmann's Neck
-
- Posts: 12373
- Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 2:33 am
by carl_feedthegoat » Sun Jan 31, 2010 5:31 pm
THE OP SAYS...ARE YOU HAPPY WITH TODAYS GAME...NOT TODAYS RESULT...TODAYS GAME AND THE ANSWER HAS TO BE NO AS WE WERE LETHARGIC TO PUT IT NICELY.
THEY SAY SWEARING IS DUE TO A LIMITED VOCABULARY. I KNOW THOUSANDS OF WORDS, BUT I STILL PREFER "FUCK OFF" TO "GO AWAY"
-
carl_feedthegoat
- Donated to the site

- Anna Connell's Vision
-
- Posts: 33572
- Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2005 2:51 am
- Supporter of: Man City
by CityFanFromRome » Sun Jan 31, 2010 5:42 pm
carl_feedthegoat wrote:THE OP SAYS...ARE YOU HAPPY WITH TODAYS GAME...NOT TODAYS RESULT...TODAYS GAME AND THE ANSWER HAS TO BE NO AS WE WERE LETHARGIC TO PUT IT NICELY.
The result is the most important part of the game though.
-

CityFanFromRome
- Joe Hart's 29 Clean Sheets
-
- Posts: 5129
- Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 6:20 pm
- Location: Rome
- Supporter of: Man City & Roma
- My favourite player is: Carlos Tévez
by Beefymcfc » Sun Jan 31, 2010 5:42 pm
No, because we won and yes because of the tactics. Players didn't know what their position was and the amount of respect we showed them was unreal - unless we were just unsure? Wait, does that come back to tactics?
Lucky we've got players who can score, eh?
In the words of my Old Man, "Life will never be the same without Man City, so get it in while you can".
The Future's Bright, The Future's Blue!!!
-

Beefymcfc
- Anna Connell's Vision
-
- Posts: 46785
- Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 7:14 am
- Supporter of: The Mighty Blues
Return to The Maine Football forum
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: ayrshireblue, Beefymcfc, bigblue, Blue In Bolton, BlueinBosnia, carl_feedthegoat, CTID Hants, Harry Dowd scored, john@staustell, Nick, Nickyboy, nottsblue, Scatman, Swales4ever and 1563 guests