carl_feedthegoat wrote:Sarri will be sacked if they lose this/when they lose this.
salford city wrote:He's on thin ice with that dressing room full of snakes. Hope he sees it through as I like him Napoli were the best team we played last season gave us a game both times so he will do it given time. Unfortunately, Roman can't spell time
sheblue wrote:carl_feedthegoat wrote:Sarri will be sacked if they lose this/when they lose this.
That would be stupid. Appoint a manager to change the playing style and philosophy. And then just sack him. Surely Roman isn't that thick.
john@staustell wrote:sheblue wrote:carl_feedthegoat wrote:Sarri will be sacked if they lose this/when they lose this.
That would be stupid. Appoint a manager to change the playing style and philosophy. And then just sack him. Surely Roman isn't that thick.
Happens time and again. Problem is Roman's got eyes in his head. Bottom line is they are terrible, the stupidest fan can see Jorginho ain't right and the world's best midfield anchor is on the right wing
sheblue wrote:john@staustell wrote:sheblue wrote:carl_feedthegoat wrote:Sarri will be sacked if they lose this/when they lose this.
That would be stupid. Appoint a manager to change the playing style and philosophy. And then just sack him. Surely Roman isn't that thick.
Happens time and again. Problem is Roman's got eyes in his head. Bottom line is they are terrible, the stupidest fan can see Jorginho ain't right and the world's best midfield anchor is on the right wing
Just seems to me it should have been obvious that appointing Sarri meant it would be a long term thing which would mean pain in transition. I dont know what went on there, maybe they thought he could do it short term, which of course he can not.
john@staustell wrote:sheblue wrote:john@staustell wrote:sheblue wrote:carl_feedthegoat wrote:Sarri will be sacked if they lose this/when they lose this.
That would be stupid. Appoint a manager to change the playing style and philosophy. And then just sack him. Surely Roman isn't that thick.
Happens time and again. Problem is Roman's got eyes in his head. Bottom line is they are terrible, the stupidest fan can see Jorginho ain't right and the world's best midfield anchor is on the right wing
Just seems to me it should have been obvious that appointing Sarri meant it would be a long term thing which would mean pain in transition. I dont know what went on there, maybe they thought he could do it short term, which of course he can not.
Trouble is the long term argument only works with managers that are any good. People take it to the extreme and say everyone should be 'given time'. When clearly sometimes persisting would be catastrophic
Chairman's job is to work out which is which!
sheblue wrote:john@staustell wrote:sheblue wrote:carl_feedthegoat wrote:Sarri will be sacked if they lose this/when they lose this.
That would be stupid. Appoint a manager to change the playing style and philosophy. And then just sack him. Surely Roman isn't that thick.
Happens time and again. Problem is Roman's got eyes in his head. Bottom line is they are terrible, the stupidest fan can see Jorginho ain't right and the world's best midfield anchor is on the right wing
Just seems to me it should have been obvious that appointing Sarri meant it would be a long term thing which would mean pain in transition. I dont know what went on there, maybe they thought he could do it short term, which of course he can not.
carl_feedthegoat wrote:sheblue wrote:john@staustell wrote:sheblue wrote:carl_feedthegoat wrote:Sarri will be sacked if they lose this/when they lose this.
That would be stupid. Appoint a manager to change the playing style and philosophy. And then just sack him. Surely Roman isn't that thick.
Happens time and again. Problem is Roman's got eyes in his head. Bottom line is they are terrible, the stupidest fan can see Jorginho ain't right and the world's best midfield anchor is on the right wing
Just seems to me it should have been obvious that appointing Sarri meant it would be a long term thing which would mean pain in transition. I dont know what went on there, maybe they thought he could do it short term, which of course he can not.
He hasn’t won anything in 30 years ! He was brought in on the back of his Napoli job , even they managed to fuck up winning the league .
He also doesn’t seem to have plan B - recipe for disaster .
sheblue wrote:
I am not saying he is good. I am not saying he will be a success. I couldnt care less. But if they appointed a guy who has a very different approach from their previous managers then surely they didn't think it would all just fall into place just like that. If they did they are really stupid.
zuricity wrote:So long Monsieur Puel
patrickblue wrote:Looks like Brendan Bodgers and his amazing new teeth are back,
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/47368961
Mase wrote:patrickblue wrote:Looks like Brendan Bodgers and his amazing new teeth are back,
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/47368961
I'd just stay at Celtic. Leicester have won the league once and think they're a massive club now. Any manager going there is in a shit position unless they win the league again.
Nigels Tackle wrote:Mase wrote:patrickblue wrote:Looks like Brendan Bodgers and his amazing new teeth are back,
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/47368961
I'd just stay at Celtic. Leicester have won the league once and think they're a massive club now. Any manager going there is in a shit position unless they win the league again.
you’ve been to glasgow haven’t you?
leicester is fucking paradise in comparison
patrickblue wrote:Looks like Brendan Bodgers and his amazing new teeth are back.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/47368961
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: BlueinBosnia, blues-clues, Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot], PeterParker, stupot and 739 guests