john@staustell wrote:For me the obvious proof was in Portugal - was it Sporting or Porto, similar racism at both? - Yaya was racially abused by their fans - blatantly - and the club got fined 15000 euros. City were 1 minute late on the pitch at HT and got fined 90000 euros.
Really?
carl_feedthegoat wrote:john@staustell wrote:For me the obvious proof was in Portugal - was it Sporting or Porto, similar racism at both? - Yaya was racially abused by their fans - blatantly - and the club got fined 15000 euros. City were 1 minute late on the pitch at HT and got fined 90000 euros.
Really?
Moscow was just as bad ......whatever doubts there may have been soon evaporated with what went on there.
Mase wrote:carl_feedthegoat wrote:john@staustell wrote:For me the obvious proof was in Portugal - was it Sporting or Porto, similar racism at both? - Yaya was racially abused by their fans - blatantly - and the club got fined 15000 euros. City were 1 minute late on the pitch at HT and got fined 90000 euros.
Really?
Moscow was just as bad ......whatever doubts there may have been soon evaporated with what went on there.
Was that when fans were banned in the stadium because their fans racially abused someone, but on the night they still had a couple of thousand fans in there?!
john68 wrote:I have posted this a number of times but it seems relevent to repost this again at this time.
It was in the 1980s that a the then richest 14 European clubs got together to form a powerful lobby group in order to maximise their profits.
It was that lobby group who designed the current format of the Champions League to replace the old European Cup.
1) Ditch the little clubs, they are too smallfry to attract income to the big clubs.
2) Seeding; In order to ensure the rich clubs didn't play each other until the later rounds, thus guaranteeing longer cup runs, more media and sponsor income.
3) Seeding via coefficients that accumulated each year. 5yrs was the qualifying total (recently changed to 10yrs), allowing the rich clubs have a bad year or two but remain in the elite group.
4) That the bigger footbal nations: England, Germany, Italy and Spain were allowed more qualifying places toensure the likes of Barca and Real, the rags and (originally) Liverpool, etc, had a more or less guaranteed entrance into the income channels.
5) The first season, there were 2 group stages, so designed because to compete meant having a large squad, better affordable only by rich clubs from rich leagues. (Ever wondered why all those East European clubs stopped competing?).
6) They demanded that the clubs fom those bigger richer football nations should receive more money per game than other nations.
They coerced UeFA and got everything they demanded.
They demanded this on the back of a threatened Euro SuperLeague. When Platini threatened to ban them from their domestic competitions, Rummenigge told him the cartel clubs "Would shut the UeFA shop"
In 2005-06, The cartel cosigned with Royal Charlerois in a court case aginst FIFA. The outcome was that FIFA and UeFA lost the right to control Global and European football.
Effectivel, they now controlled European football, They chose who they didn't want to play, they guaranteed annual qualification, they built and filled a trough and with FFP they ring fenced it to protect their gains.
Forget football, this was a money and power grab by a small group of football related multinational businesses. And they were successful.
When Chelsea appeared, 2 English places became 4 so Chelsea were absorbed.
With City, there was no room for absorbtion, so City (and PSG0 had to be stopped. Carl has been very eloquent on some of the shite they have done to us,either to stop us or delay us.
We have won a major battle...but this war is very far from being over. The bastards are already talking and no doubt planning their next attack on us.
THIS SHITE IS FAR FROM FINISHED
john68 wrote:Just as an addendum to the above which really only deals with corruption at an institutional level, the football institutions throughout Europe have allowed outside bodies to create havoc with our game.
VAR was never considered as a tool to ensure poor onfield decisions were eradicated, it was a tool that alloweed the corrupt institutions to have more power and control over match rtesults.
Remember that Scudamore before his retirement said "It is a tragedy for English football that Manchester United don't win the Premier Lge every season, but I suppose we have to make it a competititon"
Simply put...As England biggest club and money earner, the rags generate more income for the Prem through globa broadcasting rights. More global sales for the Prem, more global sales for the broadcasters, higher advertising prices...Everybody gains except the fan who want a fair on pitch result every game.
Agents have become the lubrication of corruption. Deals with managers who are tied to an agent and get kick backs when they buy a player through him/her.
Clubs not buying the player they need to improve the team but the player that generates the most income for the agent and corrupt manager.
Agents tied to illegal betting organisations who are then able through their contracted players to control results. (I will explain that in more detail if necessary).
A well known manager left a current Prem club because he refused to notify his chairman of the team selection "24hrs before the KO. Clubs in danger of relegation paying sums to cash strapped mid table clubs to throw games. Betting companies linked to clubs.
Football died a long time ago. City have bucked the trend, fought back and won a major battle. The enemy are regrouping both domestically and globally.
It's gonna be fun in the next few years.
Harry Dowd scored wrote:One thing is certain, any doubt that there is a cartel/media campaign against the club has now been erased.
Beefymcfc wrote:Harry Dowd scored wrote:One thing is certain, any doubt that there is a cartel/media campaign against the club has now been erased.
Clear and obvious, you could say.
I’m a lover of football who happens to be a City fan and you would think that actual fans of football would think the same, that we could wrestle the game back now that this part of the proceeding has been concluded. Alas, it’s not about that for some, it’s about the partisan politics that are driven by the cartel clubs that the sheeples are willing to accept as the truth.
I’ve seen a few columns reporting/opining on the actual result but they are drowned out by the avalanche of bullshit that is put across as fact.
The worst part of this was that the back pages had already been written, the broadcast media had everybody in place to comment, and when the news came in they had nothing to report as it had already been set. Although it was a triumphant day for Blues, it was also a very sad day in many respects.
I’d been wearing that tinfoil hat for so many years it felt like losing my crown. But, with a sigh, aside it went, passed to the Rags and Dippers, as I realised I’m just normal and they now see conspiracies everywhere.
sheblue wrote:Did anyone actually, seriously think there was (and still is) no agenda?
Beefymcfc wrote:sheblue wrote:Did anyone actually, seriously think there was (and still is) no agenda?
Well, I’m sure there were but that mindset must have changed some time ago. Nobody willing to admit it, anyway.
PeterParker wrote:Henderson ...
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: gmercer1, Harry Dowd scored, salford city and 231 guests