MCFC v UEFA | Verdict 13 Jul 20

[johnny crossan]

The integrity-free cockroaches in their death throes trying to pretend they are agony-free - what a delightful excremental spectacle

[Harry Dowd scored]

The integrity-free cockroaches in their death throes trying to pretend they are agony-free - what a delightful excremental spectacle

Quality Johnny pure Quality

[patrickblue]

Dan Roan is such a bitter turd - what a vile spin he’s tried to put on the bbc article

In fairness I don't think he's responsible for the article, as there's now his analysis attached to it, which not particularly supportive of City, is pretty unbiased.

[salford city]

Dan Roan is such a bitter turd - what a vile spin he’s tried to put on the bbc article

In fairness I don't think he's responsible for the article, as there's now his analysis attached to it, which not particularly supportive of City, is pretty unbiased.

I dont find it particularly unbiased. City fans can take little comfort what a turd he is. I like the bit about us cooperating earlier and we could have won the case - fuck me, you could not make this shit up. So we know now that the original emails that started this witch-hunt off were already a couple of years prior to FFP being introduced
and that we only failed to comply in our own witch- hunt on two occasions and finally, that there were nine clubs involved. I no/e that there has never been any negative press regarding this underhand attempt by the no-mark nine to pressure the appeal.

What a true crock of shite this has been. I do hope that we use this as a stick to smash everyone with moving forward

[Mase]

Where in the report does it say that the emails were from 2 years prior to FFP?

[aaron bond]

Where in the report does it say that the emails were from 2 years prior to FFP?

Page 58 shows the original email dated 2010.

Page 66 (section 225) they state it was 2 years prior.

[Mase]

Where in the report does it say that the emails were from 2 years prior to FFP?

Page 58 shows the original email dated 2010.

Page 66 (section 225) they state it was 2 years prior.

Thanking you

A scouse mate claiming it states no where in there that the emails were from pre-FFP. I’ve sent it on to him

[Foreverinbluedreams]

Where in the report does it say that the emails were from 2 years prior to FFP?

Page 58 shows the original email dated 2010.

Page 66 (section 225) they state it was 2 years prior.

Thanking you

A scouse mate claiming it states no where in there that the emails were from pre-FFP. I’ve sent it on to him

One of the emails were pre FFP

[Harry Dowd scored]

I just hope everybody at the club takes into account the actions of nine fellow premier league clubs, for me they look rather pathetic now, hope the fans at the stadium make their feelings known, if and when they are allowed back.

[johnny crossan]

the influence of Martin Samuel at work here I suspect

[Harry Dowd scored]

I suppose this report is as good as it is going to get -:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footb ... -UEFA.html

Ah posted this at same time as JC sorry

[trueblue64]

This headline on Sly Sports

"Why Man City escaped a CL ban"

We did not escape we were not fucking guilty.

[ayrshireblue]

This headline on Sly Sports

"Why Man City escaped a CL ban"

We did not escape we were not fucking guilty.

Similar punditry on Sunday about Norwich being unlucky not to be ahead after scoring. They weren't unlucky, they were offside. Not hard but keep stating that there was luck involved and the general public who don't look past the end of their nose believe what they are told.

[salford city]

This headline on Sly Sports

"Why Man City escaped a CL ban"

We did not escape we were not fucking guilty.

That is another fucking shocker. We were already looking at being banned for something that we had not done. How we could be escaping from a travesty is beyond me.
It does further illustrate the Sky narrative though

[carl_feedthegoat]

This is why SU didn't join in with the cockroaches.

https://www.thestar.co.uk/sport/footbal ... al-2927165

[Hazy2]

This is why SU didn't join in with the cockroaches.

https://www.thestar.co.uk/sport/footbal ... al-2927165

Fair play, have had a great season Get your money on the Sheff U going down. Major fall-outs behind the scenes over bonus and increases if they stay up. Half the squad not talking with the management and the club, sad.

[Harry Dowd scored]

This is interesting-:



CAS report reveals ongoing Man City complaint into UEFA investigation leaks
Manchester City have complained to UEFA's disciplinary body about the leaking of information from the Investigatory Chamber
Manchester City could yet score another victory in their battle with UEFA after it emerged that they have complained to the organisation's disciplinary body over information leaking out of the investigation into the club.
The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) this month overturned a two-year Champions League ban as the independent hearing found that the Blues "did not disguise equity funding as sponsorship".
A £9m fine was handed out, reduced from £27m, as a result of City being deemed to have not co-operated with the initial investigation; the full report released this week suggested that had the evidence presented to CAS been made available in the first place, an appeal may not have been necessary.
Man City UEFA ban overturned

CAS statement
However, City were so concerned with the initial investigation that they made the unprecedented step of going to CAS before a decision had been reached to contest leaks to the media that they alleged to have come from the Investigatory Chamber.
And while the appeal was rejected because no punishment had yet been handed out, the hearing described the leaks as "worrisome" and said it was puzzling how they could be described as groundless by the chief investigator of the Club Financial Control Body when they clearly had merit.
The latest report reveals that on January 21, 2020 - six weeks after the first CAS decision - City took their complaint about the alleged leaks from the Investigatory Chamber to UEFA's Control, Ethics and Disciplinary Body (CEDB) with proceedings still pending.


The CEDB "consists of a chairman, two vice-chairmen and thirteen other members. As a rule, it reaches decisions in the presence of all its members. It is, however, entitled to take a decision if at least three of its members are present and in certain circumstances the chairman, one of the vice-chairmen or one of the other members may take a decision as a judge sitting alone".
It normally makes decisions monthly but there have been no meetings since the end of March, a time when the impact of the pandemic was becoming clearer.
FOLLOW THE MANCHESTER EVENING NEWS

[carl_feedthegoat]

I bet City KNOW who the leaks come from and they want him hung out to dry.

[City64]

Got a feeling MCFC are going to make an example of one or two “journo” snakes .

[Outcast]

Dirty fucking scousers twisting the knife and reporting false info...

I shouldn't, I take no pleasure but I had to leave this on their scummy news articles;

'Hillsborough police lives matter'