Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:This is disappointment to say the least. I expected decent row still going on but some lightweight insults only. There's only DHTP and Original Dub left who can have decent arguments with. Rest are bunch of 'boohoo, I'm a victim' New York City survivor softies. I miss dev.
Alex Sapphire wrote:oy Twat.
I only left because I'd downed you with so many telling blows I assumed your corner would throw in the towel.
Dunne's Half-Time Pint wrote:Alex Sapphire wrote:oy Twat.
I only left because I'd downed you with so many telling blows I assumed your corner would throw in the towel.
He doesn't have a corner. Or a towel.
Beefymcfc wrote:I reckon Hughes would've got a point yesterday!
Original Dub wrote:Dunne's Half-Time Pint wrote:Alex Sapphire wrote:oy Twat.
I only left because I'd downed you with so many telling blows I assumed your corner would throw in the towel.
He doesn't have a corner. Or a towel.
But he certainly likes getting inside the ring
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:This is disappointment to say the least. I expected decent row still going on but some lightweight insults only. There's only DHTP and Original Dub left who can have decent arguments with. Rest are bunch of 'boohoo, I'm a victim' New York City survivor softies. I miss dev.
Dunne's Half-Time Pint wrote:Original Dub wrote:Dunne's Half-Time Pint wrote:Alex Sapphire wrote:oy Twat.
I only left because I'd downed you with so many telling blows I assumed your corner would throw in the towel.
He doesn't have a corner. Or a towel.
But he certainly likes getting inside the ring
Tapped into an open goal.
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:This is disappointment to say the least. I expected decent row still going on but some lightweight insults only. There's only DHTP and Original Dub left who can have decent arguments with. Rest are bunch of 'boohoo, I'm a victim' New York City survivor softies. I miss dev.
Wonderwall wrote:Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:This is disappointment to say the least. I expected decent row still going on but some lightweight insults only. There's only DHTP and Original Dub left who can have decent arguments with. Rest are bunch of 'boohoo, I'm a victim' New York City survivor softies. I miss dev.
as long as your here antti you will always have someone to argue with.
;-)
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:This is disappointment to say the least. I expected decent row still going on but some lightweight insults only. There's only DHTP and Original Dub left who can have decent arguments with. Rest are bunch of 'boohoo, I'm a victim' New York City survivor softies. I miss dev.
Ted Hughes wrote:I voted for Hughes, not because I know he's better than Mancini (that's impossible to know even though various knowitall wanker football fucking genius types can tell me for sure that Mancini's better) but because I was perfectly happy with how he was building the team, thought most of his signings were excellent, his work behind the scenes was excellent & we played all out attacking football that most of the two faced twats on here were begging for (until it happened & then it became 'tactically naive')
Now it's fucking laughable reading posts from the same titheads that slagged Hughes off rationalising how it's perfectly acceptable to play Benjani instead of Robinho, signing a 33 year old injury prone defensive midfield player is a good move, Playing Petrov on the right (something Hughes was called a cluelass cunt for doing for 10 minutes) is ok & to top it all TO FUCKING TOP IT ALL...THE PEOPLE WHO SAID HUGHES COULDN'T GET THE BEST OUT OF ROBINHO ARE NOW TURNING ON ROBINHO BECAUSE HE'S BEEN EVEN FUCKING WORSE UNDER MANCINI!!!! I have no problem with any of the things Mancini has done but lots of people on here would be going fucking spare if Hughes had done the same.
People who slaughtered Hughes for playing Ched Evans & Caicedo claiming Mancini's somehow better at giving young players a chance for playing a couple of kids in the FA Cup when we had 10 fucking players missing!! Now he's talking about loaning out Weiss, NOT A FUCKING MURMOUR! I have no problem with his actions there but you fuckers should.
Hughes has gone, don't care anymore, I'm now 100% behind Mancini & think/ hope he can continue & improve on the great work Hughes did, perhaps spot some things Hughes didn't but make no mistake, Hughes sacking is, apart from Ranieri's, probably the most unfair, ever in the history of football in this country. Let's hope Mancini can add a couple of players & have the success that Mourinho did with Ranieri's team. Onwards & upwards & I'll stand side by side with you hypocritical cunts.
Wonderwall wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:I voted for Hughes, not because I know he's better than Mancini (that's impossible to know even though various knowitall wanker football fucking genius types can tell me for sure that Mancini's better) but because I was perfectly happy with how he was building the team, thought most of his signings were excellent, his work behind the scenes was excellent & we played all out attacking football that most of the two faced twats on here were begging for (until it happened & then it became 'tactically naive')
Now it's fucking laughable reading posts from the same titheads that slagged Hughes off rationalising how it's perfectly acceptable to play Benjani instead of Robinho, signing a 33 year old injury prone defensive midfield player is a good move, Playing Petrov on the right (something Hughes was called a cluelass cunt for doing for 10 minutes) is ok & to top it all TO FUCKING TOP IT ALL...THE PEOPLE WHO SAID HUGHES COULDN'T GET THE BEST OUT OF ROBINHO ARE NOW TURNING ON ROBINHO BECAUSE HE'S BEEN EVEN FUCKING WORSE UNDER MANCINI!!!! I have no problem with any of the things Mancini has done but lots of people on here would be going fucking spare if Hughes had done the same.
People who slaughtered Hughes for playing Ched Evans & Caicedo claiming Mancini's somehow better at giving young players a chance for playing a couple of kids in the FA Cup when we had 10 fucking players missing!! Now he's talking about loaning out Weiss, NOT A FUCKING MURMOUR! I have no problem with his actions there but you fuckers should.
Hughes has gone, don't care anymore, I'm now 100% behind Mancini & think/ hope he can continue & improve on the great work Hughes did, perhaps spot some things Hughes didn't but make no mistake, Hughes sacking is, apart from Ranieri's, probably the most unfair, ever in the history of football in this country. Let's hope Mancini can add a couple of players & have the success that Mourinho did with Ranieri's team. Onwards & upwards & I'll stand side by side with you hypocritical cunts.
now that is a quality post!
10.Goater_Legend wrote:Wonderwall wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:I voted for Hughes, not because I know he's better than Mancini (that's impossible to know even though various knowitall wanker football fucking genius types can tell me for sure that Mancini's better) but because I was perfectly happy with how he was building the team, thought most of his signings were excellent, his work behind the scenes was excellent & we played all out attacking football that most of the two faced twats on here were begging for (until it happened & then it became 'tactically naive')
Now it's fucking laughable reading posts from the same titheads that slagged Hughes off rationalising how it's perfectly acceptable to play Benjani instead of Robinho, signing a 33 year old injury prone defensive midfield player is a good move, Playing Petrov on the right (something Hughes was called a cluelass cunt for doing for 10 minutes) is ok & to top it all TO FUCKING TOP IT ALL...THE PEOPLE WHO SAID HUGHES COULDN'T GET THE BEST OUT OF ROBINHO ARE NOW TURNING ON ROBINHO BECAUSE HE'S BEEN EVEN FUCKING WORSE UNDER MANCINI!!!! I have no problem with any of the things Mancini has done but lots of people on here would be going fucking spare if Hughes had done the same.
People who slaughtered Hughes for playing Ched Evans & Caicedo claiming Mancini's somehow better at giving young players a chance for playing a couple of kids in the FA Cup when we had 10 fucking players missing!! Now he's talking about loaning out Weiss, NOT A FUCKING MURMOUR! I have no problem with his actions there but you fuckers should.
Hughes has gone, don't care anymore, I'm now 100% behind Mancini & think/ hope he can continue & improve on the great work Hughes did, perhaps spot some things Hughes didn't but make no mistake, Hughes sacking is, apart from Ranieri's, probably the most unfair, ever in the history of football in this country. Let's hope Mancini can add a couple of players & have the success that Mourinho did with Ranieri's team. Onwards & upwards & I'll stand side by side with you hypocritical cunts.
now that is a quality post!
I second this
10.Goater_Legend wrote:Wonderwall wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:I voted for Hughes, not because I know he's better than Mancini (that's impossible to know even though various knowitall wanker football fucking genius types can tell me for sure that Mancini's better) but because I was perfectly happy with how he was building the team, thought most of his signings were excellent, his work behind the scenes was excellent & we played all out attacking football that most of the two faced twats on here were begging for (until it happened & then it became 'tactically naive')
Now it's fucking laughable reading posts from the same titheads that slagged Hughes off rationalising how it's perfectly acceptable to play Benjani instead of Robinho, signing a 33 year old injury prone defensive midfield player is a good move, Playing Petrov on the right (something Hughes was called a cluelass cunt for doing for 10 minutes) is ok & to top it all TO FUCKING TOP IT ALL...THE PEOPLE WHO SAID HUGHES COULDN'T GET THE BEST OUT OF ROBINHO ARE NOW TURNING ON ROBINHO BECAUSE HE'S BEEN EVEN FUCKING WORSE UNDER MANCINI!!!! I have no problem with any of the things Mancini has done but lots of people on here would be going fucking spare if Hughes had done the same.
People who slaughtered Hughes for playing Ched Evans & Caicedo claiming Mancini's somehow better at giving young players a chance for playing a couple of kids in the FA Cup when we had 10 fucking players missing!! Now he's talking about loaning out Weiss, NOT A FUCKING MURMOUR! I have no problem with his actions there but you fuckers should.
Hughes has gone, don't care anymore, I'm now 100% behind Mancini & think/ hope he can continue & improve on the great work Hughes did, perhaps spot some things Hughes didn't but make no mistake, Hughes sacking is, apart from Ranieri's, probably the most unfair, ever in the history of football in this country. Let's hope Mancini can add a couple of players & have the success that Mourinho did with Ranieri's team. Onwards & upwards & I'll stand side by side with you hypocritical cunts.
now that is a quality post!
I second this
Alex Sapphire wrote:10.Goater_Legend wrote:Wonderwall wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:I voted for Hughes, not because I know he's better than Mancini (that's impossible to know even though various knowitall wanker football fucking genius types can tell me for sure that Mancini's better) but because I was perfectly happy with how he was building the team, thought most of his signings were excellent, his work behind the scenes was excellent & we played all out attacking football that most of the two faced twats on here were begging for (until it happened & then it became 'tactically naive')
Now it's fucking laughable reading posts from the same titheads that slagged Hughes off rationalising how it's perfectly acceptable to play Benjani instead of Robinho, signing a 33 year old injury prone defensive midfield player is a good move, Playing Petrov on the right (something Hughes was called a cluelass cunt for doing for 10 minutes) is ok & to top it all TO FUCKING TOP IT ALL...THE PEOPLE WHO SAID HUGHES COULDN'T GET THE BEST OUT OF ROBINHO ARE NOW TURNING ON ROBINHO BECAUSE HE'S BEEN EVEN FUCKING WORSE UNDER MANCINI!!!! I have no problem with any of the things Mancini has done but lots of people on here would be going fucking spare if Hughes had done the same.
People who slaughtered Hughes for playing Ched Evans & Caicedo claiming Mancini's somehow better at giving young players a chance for playing a couple of kids in the FA Cup when we had 10 fucking players missing!! Now he's talking about loaning out Weiss, NOT A FUCKING MURMOUR! I have no problem with his actions there but you fuckers should.
Hughes has gone, don't care anymore, I'm now 100% behind Mancini & think/ hope he can continue & improve on the great work Hughes did, perhaps spot some things Hughes didn't but make no mistake, Hughes sacking is, apart from Ranieri's, probably the most unfair, ever in the history of football in this country. Let's hope Mancini can add a couple of players & have the success that Mourinho did with Ranieri's team. Onwards & upwards & I'll stand side by side with you hypocritical cunts.
now that is a quality post!
I second this
Lock the thread. All that needs saying has now been said
ENIAM NAM wrote:Alex Sapphire wrote:10.Goater_Legend wrote:Wonderwall wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:I voted for Hughes, not because I know he's better than Mancini (that's impossible to know even though various knowitall wanker football fucking genius types can tell me for sure that Mancini's better) but because I was perfectly happy with how he was building the team, thought most of his signings were excellent, his work behind the scenes was excellent & we played all out attacking football that most of the two faced twats on here were begging for (until it happened & then it became 'tactically naive')
Now it's fucking laughable reading posts from the same titheads that slagged Hughes off rationalising how it's perfectly acceptable to play Benjani instead of Robinho, signing a 33 year old injury prone defensive midfield player is a good move, Playing Petrov on the right (something Hughes was called a cluelass cunt for doing for 10 minutes) is ok & to top it all TO FUCKING TOP IT ALL...THE PEOPLE WHO SAID HUGHES COULDN'T GET THE BEST OUT OF ROBINHO ARE NOW TURNING ON ROBINHO BECAUSE HE'S BEEN EVEN FUCKING WORSE UNDER MANCINI!!!! I have no problem with any of the things Mancini has done but lots of people on here would be going fucking spare if Hughes had done the same.
People who slaughtered Hughes for playing Ched Evans & Caicedo claiming Mancini's somehow better at giving young players a chance for playing a couple of kids in the FA Cup when we had 10 fucking players missing!! Now he's talking about loaning out Weiss, NOT A FUCKING MURMOUR! I have no problem with his actions there but you fuckers should.
Hughes has gone, don't care anymore, I'm now 100% behind Mancini & think/ hope he can continue & improve on the great work Hughes did, perhaps spot some things Hughes didn't but make no mistake, Hughes sacking is, apart from Ranieri's, probably the most unfair, ever in the history of football in this country. Let's hope Mancini can add a couple of players & have the success that Mourinho did with Ranieri's team. Onwards & upwards & I'll stand side by side with you hypocritical cunts.
now that is a quality post!
I second this
Lock the thread. All that needs saying has now been said
Amen!
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: carl_feedthegoat and 231 guests