Mancini Or Hughes, Which One Would You Have

Here is the place to talk about all things city and football!

Mancini Or Hughes

Mancini
91
81%
Hughes
22
19%
 
Total votes : 113

Re: Mancini Or Hughes, Which One Would You Have

Postby Niall Quinns Discopants » Sun Jan 17, 2010 5:48 pm

This is disappointment to say the least. I expected decent row still going on but some lightweight insults only. There's only DHTP and Original Dub left who can have decent arguments with. Rest are bunch of 'boohoo, I'm a victim' New York City survivor softies. I miss dev.
Sometimes we're good and sometimes we're bad but when we're good, at least we're much better than we used to be and when we are bad we're just as bad as we always used to be, so that's got to be good hasn't it?


Mark Radcliffe
User avatar
Niall Quinns Discopants
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 40255
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 1:19 pm
Location: Deep in the pimp game
Supporter of: Holistic approach
My favourite player is: Bishop Magic Don Juan

Re: Mancini Or Hughes, Which One Would You Have

Postby Kladze » Sun Jan 17, 2010 5:52 pm

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:This is disappointment to say the least. I expected decent row still going on but some lightweight insults only. There's only DHTP and Original Dub left who can have decent arguments with. Rest are bunch of 'boohoo, I'm a victim' New York City survivor softies. I miss dev.


A self publicist like you doesn't need the likes of us to do your work Antii
[center]Image[/center]
User avatar
Kladze
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Rosler's Grandad Bombed The Swamp
 
Posts: 3388
Joined: Sun May 04, 2008 5:42 pm
Location: Manchester
Supporter of: City
My favourite player is: NdJ

Re: Mancini Or Hughes, Which One Would You Have

Postby Alex Sapphire » Sun Jan 17, 2010 5:53 pm

oy Twat.
I only left because I'd downed you with so many telling blows I assumed your corner would throw in the towel.
Never criticise a man until you've walked a mile in his shoes.
That way when you do criticise him you'll be a mile away.
And you'll have his shoes.


Ἄνδρες γάρ πόλις, καί οὐ τείχη
User avatar
Alex Sapphire
Joe Hart's 29 Clean Sheets
 
Posts: 5758
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2006 10:02 am

Re: Mancini Or Hughes, Which One Would You Have

Postby Dunne's Half-Time Pint » Sun Jan 17, 2010 5:54 pm

Alex Sapphire wrote:oy Twat.
I only left because I'd downed you with so many telling blows I assumed your corner would throw in the towel.


He doesn't have a corner. Or a towel.
All we are saying is give Doug a pass.
Dunne's Half-Time Pint
David Silva's Silky Skills
 
Posts: 6683
Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2006 5:37 pm
Location: Leeds/Manchester

Re: Mancini Or Hughes, Which One Would You Have

Postby Original Dub » Sun Jan 17, 2010 6:00 pm

Dunne's Half-Time Pint wrote:
Alex Sapphire wrote:oy Twat.
I only left because I'd downed you with so many telling blows I assumed your corner would throw in the towel.


He doesn't have a corner. Or a towel.


But he certainly likes getting inside the ring
Original Dub
 

Re: Mancini Or Hughes, Which One Would You Have

Postby CityFanFromRome » Sun Jan 17, 2010 6:00 pm

Beefymcfc wrote:I reckon Hughes would've got a point yesterday!

ahah, nice joke ;)

Anyway, I voted for Mancini, but I'm not actually arsed enough to read the whole topic.
User avatar
CityFanFromRome
Joe Hart's 29 Clean Sheets
 
Posts: 5129
Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 6:20 pm
Location: Rome
Supporter of: Man City & Roma
My favourite player is: Carlos Tévez

Re: Mancini Or Hughes, Which One Would You Have

Postby Dunne's Half-Time Pint » Sun Jan 17, 2010 6:02 pm

Original Dub wrote:
Dunne's Half-Time Pint wrote:
Alex Sapphire wrote:oy Twat.
I only left because I'd downed you with so many telling blows I assumed your corner would throw in the towel.


He doesn't have a corner. Or a towel.


But he certainly likes getting inside the ring


Tapped into an open goal.
All we are saying is give Doug a pass.
Dunne's Half-Time Pint
David Silva's Silky Skills
 
Posts: 6683
Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2006 5:37 pm
Location: Leeds/Manchester

Re: Mancini Or Hughes, Which One Would You Have

Postby Wonderwall » Sun Jan 17, 2010 6:04 pm

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:This is disappointment to say the least. I expected decent row still going on but some lightweight insults only. There's only DHTP and Original Dub left who can have decent arguments with. Rest are bunch of 'boohoo, I'm a victim' New York City survivor softies. I miss dev.


as long as your here antti you will always have someone to argue with.

;-)
User avatar
Wonderwall
Colin Bell's Football Brain
 
Posts: 28928
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 2:58 pm
Location: Sale
Supporter of: Gods own team

Re: Mancini Or Hughes, Which One Would You Have

Postby Original Dub » Sun Jan 17, 2010 6:05 pm

Dunne's Half-Time Pint wrote:
Original Dub wrote:
Dunne's Half-Time Pint wrote:
Alex Sapphire wrote:oy Twat.
I only left because I'd downed you with so many telling blows I assumed your corner would throw in the towel.


He doesn't have a corner. Or a towel.


But he certainly likes getting inside the ring


Tapped into an open goal.


Ah thank ya...
Original Dub
 

Re: Mancini Or Hughes, Which One Would You Have

Postby DoomMerchant » Sun Jan 17, 2010 6:07 pm

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:This is disappointment to say the least. I expected decent row still going on but some lightweight insults only. There's only DHTP and Original Dub left who can have decent arguments with. Rest are bunch of 'boohoo, I'm a victim' New York City survivor softies. I miss dev.


like thumbwrestling with Stephen Hawking. So smart...yr stupid.

there's nothing to see here...go on about making yr tricked out dinner...and put it in the recipe thread so that you can do more good than harm on mcf.net today please. i'm hungry.

cheers
viVa el ciTy!

"All things considered, there's absolutely no escape from this hellish situation. I'm prepared to take the coward's way out if you are. It's reincarnation or nothing." -- Gideon Stargrave

Image
User avatar
DoomMerchant
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Pellegrini's Hoodie
 
Posts: 22332
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 6:46 pm
Location: Orlando, FL
Supporter of: MCFC. OK.
My favourite player is: The Game

Re: Mancini Or Hughes, Which One Would You Have

Postby Niall Quinns Discopants » Sun Jan 17, 2010 6:08 pm

Wonderwall wrote:
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:This is disappointment to say the least. I expected decent row still going on but some lightweight insults only. There's only DHTP and Original Dub left who can have decent arguments with. Rest are bunch of 'boohoo, I'm a victim' New York City survivor softies. I miss dev.


as long as your here antti you will always have someone to argue with.

;-)


haha.

Not the best scene to have a fight in empty room, but sometimes that will have to do.
Sometimes we're good and sometimes we're bad but when we're good, at least we're much better than we used to be and when we are bad we're just as bad as we always used to be, so that's got to be good hasn't it?


Mark Radcliffe
User avatar
Niall Quinns Discopants
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 40255
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 1:19 pm
Location: Deep in the pimp game
Supporter of: Holistic approach
My favourite player is: Bishop Magic Don Juan

Re: Mancini Or Hughes, Which One Would You Have

Postby Ted Hughes » Sun Jan 17, 2010 6:17 pm

I voted for Hughes, not because I know he's better than Mancini (that's impossible to know even though various knowitall wanker football fucking genius types can tell me for sure that Mancini's better) but because I was perfectly happy with how he was building the team, thought most of his signings were excellent, his work behind the scenes was excellent & we played all out attacking football that most of the two faced twats on here were begging for (until it happened & then it became 'tactically naive')


Now it's fucking laughable reading posts from the same titheads that slagged Hughes off rationalising how it's perfectly acceptable to play Benjani instead of Robinho, signing a 33 year old injury prone defensive midfield player is a good move, Playing Petrov on the right (something Hughes was called a cluelass cunt for doing for 10 minutes) is ok & to top it all TO FUCKING TOP IT ALL...THE PEOPLE WHO SAID HUGHES COULDN'T GET THE BEST OUT OF ROBINHO ARE NOW TURNING ON ROBINHO BECAUSE HE'S BEEN EVEN FUCKING WORSE UNDER MANCINI!!!! I have no problem with any of the things Mancini has done but lots of people on here would be going fucking spare if Hughes had done the same.

People who slaughtered Hughes for playing Ched Evans & Caicedo claiming Mancini's somehow better at giving young players a chance for playing a couple of kids in the FA Cup when we had 10 fucking players missing!! Now he's talking about loaning out Weiss, NOT A FUCKING MURMOUR! I have no problem with his actions there but you fuckers should.

Hughes has gone, don't care anymore, I'm now 100% behind Mancini & think/ hope he can continue & improve on the great work Hughes did, perhaps spot some things Hughes didn't but make no mistake, Hughes sacking is, apart from Ranieri's, probably the most unfair, ever in the history of football in this country. Let's hope Mancini can add a couple of players & have the success that Mourinho did with Ranieri's team. Onwards & upwards & I'll stand side by side with you hypocritical cunts.
The pissartist formerly known as Ted

VIVA EL CITY !!!

Some take the bible for what it's worth.. when they say that the rags shall inherit the Earth...
Well I heard that the Sheikh... bought Carlos Tevez this week...& you fuckers aint gettin' nothin..
Ted Hughes
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Colin Bell's Football Brain
 
Posts: 28488
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 4:28 pm
Supporter of: Bill Turnbull
My favourite player is: Bill Turnbull

Re: Mancini Or Hughes, Which One Would You Have

Postby The Man In Blue » Sun Jan 17, 2010 6:20 pm

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:This is disappointment to say the least. I expected decent row still going on but some lightweight insults only. There's only DHTP and Original Dub left who can have decent arguments with. Rest are bunch of 'boohoo, I'm a victim' New York City survivor softies. I miss dev.


in boxing, when someone gets knocked the fuck out the fight ends and the winner goes home. bad form to continue assaulting already comatose opponent.

as i was already at home, i've made a curry. its fucking serious.
User avatar
The Man In Blue
Joe Hart's 29 Clean Sheets
 
Posts: 5266
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 4:33 pm
Location: Whalley Range

Re: Mancini Or Hughes, Which One Would You Have

Postby Wonderwall » Sun Jan 17, 2010 6:26 pm

Ted Hughes wrote:I voted for Hughes, not because I know he's better than Mancini (that's impossible to know even though various knowitall wanker football fucking genius types can tell me for sure that Mancini's better) but because I was perfectly happy with how he was building the team, thought most of his signings were excellent, his work behind the scenes was excellent & we played all out attacking football that most of the two faced twats on here were begging for (until it happened & then it became 'tactically naive')


Now it's fucking laughable reading posts from the same titheads that slagged Hughes off rationalising how it's perfectly acceptable to play Benjani instead of Robinho, signing a 33 year old injury prone defensive midfield player is a good move, Playing Petrov on the right (something Hughes was called a cluelass cunt for doing for 10 minutes) is ok & to top it all TO FUCKING TOP IT ALL...THE PEOPLE WHO SAID HUGHES COULDN'T GET THE BEST OUT OF ROBINHO ARE NOW TURNING ON ROBINHO BECAUSE HE'S BEEN EVEN FUCKING WORSE UNDER MANCINI!!!! I have no problem with any of the things Mancini has done but lots of people on here would be going fucking spare if Hughes had done the same.

People who slaughtered Hughes for playing Ched Evans & Caicedo claiming Mancini's somehow better at giving young players a chance for playing a couple of kids in the FA Cup when we had 10 fucking players missing!! Now he's talking about loaning out Weiss, NOT A FUCKING MURMOUR! I have no problem with his actions there but you fuckers should.

Hughes has gone, don't care anymore, I'm now 100% behind Mancini & think/ hope he can continue & improve on the great work Hughes did, perhaps spot some things Hughes didn't but make no mistake, Hughes sacking is, apart from Ranieri's, probably the most unfair, ever in the history of football in this country. Let's hope Mancini can add a couple of players & have the success that Mourinho did with Ranieri's team. Onwards & upwards & I'll stand side by side with you hypocritical cunts.


now that is a quality post!
User avatar
Wonderwall
Colin Bell's Football Brain
 
Posts: 28928
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 2:58 pm
Location: Sale
Supporter of: Gods own team

Re: Mancini Or Hughes, Which One Would You Have

Postby 10.Goater_Legend » Sun Jan 17, 2010 6:33 pm

Wonderwall wrote:
Ted Hughes wrote:I voted for Hughes, not because I know he's better than Mancini (that's impossible to know even though various knowitall wanker football fucking genius types can tell me for sure that Mancini's better) but because I was perfectly happy with how he was building the team, thought most of his signings were excellent, his work behind the scenes was excellent & we played all out attacking football that most of the two faced twats on here were begging for (until it happened & then it became 'tactically naive')


Now it's fucking laughable reading posts from the same titheads that slagged Hughes off rationalising how it's perfectly acceptable to play Benjani instead of Robinho, signing a 33 year old injury prone defensive midfield player is a good move, Playing Petrov on the right (something Hughes was called a cluelass cunt for doing for 10 minutes) is ok & to top it all TO FUCKING TOP IT ALL...THE PEOPLE WHO SAID HUGHES COULDN'T GET THE BEST OUT OF ROBINHO ARE NOW TURNING ON ROBINHO BECAUSE HE'S BEEN EVEN FUCKING WORSE UNDER MANCINI!!!! I have no problem with any of the things Mancini has done but lots of people on here would be going fucking spare if Hughes had done the same.

People who slaughtered Hughes for playing Ched Evans & Caicedo claiming Mancini's somehow better at giving young players a chance for playing a couple of kids in the FA Cup when we had 10 fucking players missing!! Now he's talking about loaning out Weiss, NOT A FUCKING MURMOUR! I have no problem with his actions there but you fuckers should.

Hughes has gone, don't care anymore, I'm now 100% behind Mancini & think/ hope he can continue & improve on the great work Hughes did, perhaps spot some things Hughes didn't but make no mistake, Hughes sacking is, apart from Ranieri's, probably the most unfair, ever in the history of football in this country. Let's hope Mancini can add a couple of players & have the success that Mourinho did with Ranieri's team. Onwards & upwards & I'll stand side by side with you hypocritical cunts.


now that is a quality post!

I second this
User avatar
10.Goater_Legend
De Jong's Tackle
 
Posts: 1976
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 12:21 am
Supporter of: City

Re: Mancini Or Hughes, Which One Would You Have

Postby Original Dub » Sun Jan 17, 2010 6:37 pm

10.Goater_Legend wrote:
Wonderwall wrote:
Ted Hughes wrote:I voted for Hughes, not because I know he's better than Mancini (that's impossible to know even though various knowitall wanker football fucking genius types can tell me for sure that Mancini's better) but because I was perfectly happy with how he was building the team, thought most of his signings were excellent, his work behind the scenes was excellent & we played all out attacking football that most of the two faced twats on here were begging for (until it happened & then it became 'tactically naive')


Now it's fucking laughable reading posts from the same titheads that slagged Hughes off rationalising how it's perfectly acceptable to play Benjani instead of Robinho, signing a 33 year old injury prone defensive midfield player is a good move, Playing Petrov on the right (something Hughes was called a cluelass cunt for doing for 10 minutes) is ok & to top it all TO FUCKING TOP IT ALL...THE PEOPLE WHO SAID HUGHES COULDN'T GET THE BEST OUT OF ROBINHO ARE NOW TURNING ON ROBINHO BECAUSE HE'S BEEN EVEN FUCKING WORSE UNDER MANCINI!!!! I have no problem with any of the things Mancini has done but lots of people on here would be going fucking spare if Hughes had done the same.

People who slaughtered Hughes for playing Ched Evans & Caicedo claiming Mancini's somehow better at giving young players a chance for playing a couple of kids in the FA Cup when we had 10 fucking players missing!! Now he's talking about loaning out Weiss, NOT A FUCKING MURMOUR! I have no problem with his actions there but you fuckers should.

Hughes has gone, don't care anymore, I'm now 100% behind Mancini & think/ hope he can continue & improve on the great work Hughes did, perhaps spot some things Hughes didn't but make no mistake, Hughes sacking is, apart from Ranieri's, probably the most unfair, ever in the history of football in this country. Let's hope Mancini can add a couple of players & have the success that Mourinho did with Ranieri's team. Onwards & upwards & I'll stand side by side with you hypocritical cunts.


now that is a quality post!

I second this


The best post I have ever read on the subject from the best poster on this site IMO.
Original Dub
 

Re: Mancini Or Hughes, Which One Would You Have

Postby Alex Sapphire » Sun Jan 17, 2010 6:37 pm

10.Goater_Legend wrote:
Wonderwall wrote:
Ted Hughes wrote:I voted for Hughes, not because I know he's better than Mancini (that's impossible to know even though various knowitall wanker football fucking genius types can tell me for sure that Mancini's better) but because I was perfectly happy with how he was building the team, thought most of his signings were excellent, his work behind the scenes was excellent & we played all out attacking football that most of the two faced twats on here were begging for (until it happened & then it became 'tactically naive')


Now it's fucking laughable reading posts from the same titheads that slagged Hughes off rationalising how it's perfectly acceptable to play Benjani instead of Robinho, signing a 33 year old injury prone defensive midfield player is a good move, Playing Petrov on the right (something Hughes was called a cluelass cunt for doing for 10 minutes) is ok & to top it all TO FUCKING TOP IT ALL...THE PEOPLE WHO SAID HUGHES COULDN'T GET THE BEST OUT OF ROBINHO ARE NOW TURNING ON ROBINHO BECAUSE HE'S BEEN EVEN FUCKING WORSE UNDER MANCINI!!!! I have no problem with any of the things Mancini has done but lots of people on here would be going fucking spare if Hughes had done the same.

People who slaughtered Hughes for playing Ched Evans & Caicedo claiming Mancini's somehow better at giving young players a chance for playing a couple of kids in the FA Cup when we had 10 fucking players missing!! Now he's talking about loaning out Weiss, NOT A FUCKING MURMOUR! I have no problem with his actions there but you fuckers should.

Hughes has gone, don't care anymore, I'm now 100% behind Mancini & think/ hope he can continue & improve on the great work Hughes did, perhaps spot some things Hughes didn't but make no mistake, Hughes sacking is, apart from Ranieri's, probably the most unfair, ever in the history of football in this country. Let's hope Mancini can add a couple of players & have the success that Mourinho did with Ranieri's team. Onwards & upwards & I'll stand side by side with you hypocritical cunts.


now that is a quality post!

I second this


Lock the thread. All that needs saying has now been said
Never criticise a man until you've walked a mile in his shoes.
That way when you do criticise him you'll be a mile away.
And you'll have his shoes.


Ἄνδρες γάρ πόλις, καί οὐ τείχη
User avatar
Alex Sapphire
Joe Hart's 29 Clean Sheets
 
Posts: 5758
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2006 10:02 am

Re: Mancini Or Hughes, Which One Would You Have

Postby ENIAM NAM » Sun Jan 17, 2010 6:39 pm

Alex Sapphire wrote:
10.Goater_Legend wrote:
Wonderwall wrote:
Ted Hughes wrote:I voted for Hughes, not because I know he's better than Mancini (that's impossible to know even though various knowitall wanker football fucking genius types can tell me for sure that Mancini's better) but because I was perfectly happy with how he was building the team, thought most of his signings were excellent, his work behind the scenes was excellent & we played all out attacking football that most of the two faced twats on here were begging for (until it happened & then it became 'tactically naive')


Now it's fucking laughable reading posts from the same titheads that slagged Hughes off rationalising how it's perfectly acceptable to play Benjani instead of Robinho, signing a 33 year old injury prone defensive midfield player is a good move, Playing Petrov on the right (something Hughes was called a cluelass cunt for doing for 10 minutes) is ok & to top it all TO FUCKING TOP IT ALL...THE PEOPLE WHO SAID HUGHES COULDN'T GET THE BEST OUT OF ROBINHO ARE NOW TURNING ON ROBINHO BECAUSE HE'S BEEN EVEN FUCKING WORSE UNDER MANCINI!!!! I have no problem with any of the things Mancini has done but lots of people on here would be going fucking spare if Hughes had done the same.

People who slaughtered Hughes for playing Ched Evans & Caicedo claiming Mancini's somehow better at giving young players a chance for playing a couple of kids in the FA Cup when we had 10 fucking players missing!! Now he's talking about loaning out Weiss, NOT A FUCKING MURMOUR! I have no problem with his actions there but you fuckers should.

Hughes has gone, don't care anymore, I'm now 100% behind Mancini & think/ hope he can continue & improve on the great work Hughes did, perhaps spot some things Hughes didn't but make no mistake, Hughes sacking is, apart from Ranieri's, probably the most unfair, ever in the history of football in this country. Let's hope Mancini can add a couple of players & have the success that Mourinho did with Ranieri's team. Onwards & upwards & I'll stand side by side with you hypocritical cunts.


now that is a quality post!

I second this


Lock the thread. All that needs saying has now been said


Amen!
ENIAM NAM
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Kinky's Mazy Dribbles
 
Posts: 2158
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 12:16 pm

Re: Mancini Or Hughes, Which One Would You Have

Postby dikdik » Sun Jan 17, 2010 6:41 pm

What do you mean by have?
I vote for Tony Book.
dikdik
Tevez's Golfing Holiday
 
Posts: 753
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 1:46 pm
Supporter of: Manchester City

Re: Mancini Or Hughes, Which One Would You Have

Postby Grob » Sun Jan 17, 2010 6:49 pm

ENIAM NAM wrote:
Alex Sapphire wrote:
10.Goater_Legend wrote:
Wonderwall wrote:
Ted Hughes wrote:I voted for Hughes, not because I know he's better than Mancini (that's impossible to know even though various knowitall wanker football fucking genius types can tell me for sure that Mancini's better) but because I was perfectly happy with how he was building the team, thought most of his signings were excellent, his work behind the scenes was excellent & we played all out attacking football that most of the two faced twats on here were begging for (until it happened & then it became 'tactically naive')


Now it's fucking laughable reading posts from the same titheads that slagged Hughes off rationalising how it's perfectly acceptable to play Benjani instead of Robinho, signing a 33 year old injury prone defensive midfield player is a good move, Playing Petrov on the right (something Hughes was called a cluelass cunt for doing for 10 minutes) is ok & to top it all TO FUCKING TOP IT ALL...THE PEOPLE WHO SAID HUGHES COULDN'T GET THE BEST OUT OF ROBINHO ARE NOW TURNING ON ROBINHO BECAUSE HE'S BEEN EVEN FUCKING WORSE UNDER MANCINI!!!! I have no problem with any of the things Mancini has done but lots of people on here would be going fucking spare if Hughes had done the same.

People who slaughtered Hughes for playing Ched Evans & Caicedo claiming Mancini's somehow better at giving young players a chance for playing a couple of kids in the FA Cup when we had 10 fucking players missing!! Now he's talking about loaning out Weiss, NOT A FUCKING MURMOUR! I have no problem with his actions there but you fuckers should.

Hughes has gone, don't care anymore, I'm now 100% behind Mancini & think/ hope he can continue & improve on the great work Hughes did, perhaps spot some things Hughes didn't but make no mistake, Hughes sacking is, apart from Ranieri's, probably the most unfair, ever in the history of football in this country. Let's hope Mancini can add a couple of players & have the success that Mourinho did with Ranieri's team. Onwards & upwards & I'll stand side by side with you hypocritical cunts.


now that is a quality post!

I second this


Lock the thread. All that needs saying has now been said


Amen!


Yeah
Image
Grob
Yaya's Wembley Winning Strikes
 
Posts: 15012
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 10:20 pm
Location: London

PreviousNext

Return to The Maine Football forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: BlueinBosnia, city72, Scatman, stupot and 195 guests