carl_feedthegoat wrote:You end up getting fucking paranoid on what you can and cannot take
I assume that was unintentional?
carl_feedthegoat wrote:You end up getting fucking paranoid on what you can and cannot take
carl_feedthegoat wrote:People go over the top regarding so called "substances" and are so quick to label them as cheats.........You end up getting fucking paranoid on what you can and cannot take - mistakes happen FFS!! and its not a case of being "thick"..some of this shit gets into all sorts of foods...drinks....ect and you wouldn't believe how it was possible !!!
If he has taken something that was not stated on the ingredient info then it is not his bastard fault - Id sue the fucking manufacturer.
On the other hand if it was then...........
blue wine wrote:carl_feedthegoat wrote:People go over the top regarding so called "substances" and are so quick to label them as cheats.........You end up getting fucking paranoid on what you can and cannot take - mistakes happen FFS!! and its not a case of being "thick"..some of this shit gets into all sorts of foods...drinks....ect and you wouldn't believe how it was possible !!!
If he has taken something that was not stated on the ingredient info then it is not his bastard fault - Id sue the fucking manufacturer.
On the other hand if it was then...........
totally agree with you here carl.
but i wonder if you would be saying the same thing if it was balo? :-)
Blue2 wrote:Why is Arsole Wenger giving ino in a press conference about one of our players?
john68 wrote:Blue2 wrote:Why is Arsole Wenger giving ino in a press conference about one of our players?
In fairness, Wenger was only answering a question he had been asked and IMHO he did what he needed to do. He spoke well of Kolo and made it plain he thought Kolo was above reproach. He then cut the subject short by keeping the subject light and joking about the wife.
Wenger did well there.
john68 wrote:In fairness to Wenger, He was asked the question. he could have chosen not to comment but took the opportunity to give a positive character reference for Kolo.
Mark Hughes has also been asked similar in his press gathering. he too made no big deal about it but took the opportunity to give Kolo a good character eference.
City are the club involved in this and have to be more guarded in what they can or can't say.
It is useful to have others defending Kolo from the outside, as it can set the media tone to be more sympathetic.
john68 wrote:In fairness to Wenger, He was asked the question. he could have chosen not to comment but took the opportunity to give a positive character reference for Kolo.
Mark Hughes has also been asked similar in his press gathering. he too made no big deal about it but took the opportunity to give Kolo a good character eference.
City are the club involved in this and have to be more guarded in what they can or can't say.
It is useful to have others defending Kolo from the outside, as it can set the media tone to be more sympathetic.
trueblue64 wrote:The Football Club has noted public comments by a number of parties connected to Kolo Toure, regarding the ongoing matter of his current suspension.
Whilst the Club will continue to make no comment on the nature, status and possible outcome of this case until its conclusion, it would like to stress that public statements from such individuals are unhelpful and in some cases untrue.
The Club would like to make it absolutely clear that until comments made by a Mr Gouriso in particular appeared in the public domain, officials of Manchester City knew neither of his existence nor even of his purported connection to Kolo Toure. Suggestions that he has spoken to club officials are wholly without foundation.
Don't think the club are to happy about such statements ........................
Slim wrote:Wow, don't believe I have had to make a serious post in ages.
The reason that a diet pill is banned is because diuretics act as a masking agent for other drugs. The reason he could be banned for two years is simply because they treat it as a worse case scenario.
trueblue64 wrote:The Football Club has noted public comments by a number of parties connected to Kolo Toure, regarding the ongoing matter of his current suspension.
Whilst the Club will continue to make no comment on the nature, status and possible outcome of this case until its conclusion, it would like to stress that public statements from such individuals are unhelpful and in some cases untrue.
The Club would like to make it absolutely clear that until comments made by a Mr Gouriso in particular appeared in the public domain, officials of Manchester City knew neither of his existence nor even of his purported connection to Kolo Toure. Suggestions that he has spoken to club officials are wholly without foundation.
Don't think the club are to happy about such statements ........................
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot], Nick and 60 guests