Mase wrote:CTID Hants wrote:The Qatari's have pulled out of process to buy the scum , leaving the Gazers high and dry
Back to the “Oil Money!!” comments then.
On the flip they were happy to take the oil money, so they can longer play that card....
Mase wrote:CTID Hants wrote:The Qatari's have pulled out of process to buy the scum , leaving the Gazers high and dry
Back to the “Oil Money!!” comments then.
CTID Hants wrote:Mase wrote:CTID Hants wrote:The Qatari's have pulled out of process to buy the scum , leaving the Gazers high and dry
Back to the “Oil Money!!” comments then.
On the flip they were happy to take the oil money, so they can longer play that card....
Tokyo Blue wrote:What would Radcliffe get out of putting a billion quid into united for a 25% stake?
nottsblue wrote:Tokyo Blue wrote:What would Radcliffe get out of putting a billion quid into united for a 25% stake?
A foot in the door?
And as this values the rags at £4B, if they were to be sold to someone else in a couple of years for the £6B that was mooted this time, then it generates a healthy profit for him.
Luckily this won't really benefit the rags. The Glazers are still there and there is now another nose in the trough. Plenty to go round I'm sure
nottsblue wrote:Tokyo Blue wrote:What would Radcliffe get out of putting a billion quid into united for a 25% stake?
A foot in the door?
And as this values the rags at £4B, if they were to be sold to someone else in a couple of years for the £6B that was mooted this time, then it generates a healthy profit for him.
Luckily this won't really benefit the rags. The Glazers are still there and there is now another nose in the trough. Plenty to go round I'm sure
Tokyo Blue wrote:nottsblue wrote:Tokyo Blue wrote:What would Radcliffe get out of putting a billion quid into united for a 25% stake?
A foot in the door?
And as this values the rags at £4B, if they were to be sold to someone else in a couple of years for the £6B that was mooted this time, then it generates a healthy profit for him.
Luckily this won't really benefit the rags. The Glazers are still there and there is now another nose in the trough. Plenty to go round I'm sure
That is assuming the value goes up, mate. When the people running that club are this incompetent (snigger), I feel it is quite a big assumption.
If I were him putting that kind of cash in, I'd want a say. I can't see him not, to be honest.
The confusion around them is fantastic. Their left hand doesn't even know what the left hand is doing, never mind the right.
nottsblue wrote:Tokyo Blue wrote:What would Radcliffe get out of putting a billion quid into united for a 25% stake?
A foot in the door?
And as this values the rags at £4B, if they were to be sold to someone else in a couple of years for the £6B that was mooted this time, then it generates a healthy profit for him.
Luckily this won't really benefit the rags. The Glazers are still there and there is now another nose in the trough. Plenty to go round I'm sure
CTID Hants wrote:https://photos.app.goo.gl/r6niU2kLXJy5GyCdA
patrickblue wrote:Ten Bob's getting all the blame again.
Poor deluded souls think changing manager again will make it all better.
Apparently Jim and his 25% is going to turn it all around.
The comedy continues apace.
nottsblue wrote:And a quite hilarious stat
Expected Goals created at Old Trafford this season:
Man Utd: 5.44(xG)
Man City: 4.13(xG)
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], london blue 2, Majestic-12 [Bot] and 293 guests