by nottsblue » Thu Aug 26, 2021 9:42 pm
Bluemoon4610 wrote:johnny crossan wrote:
(from the rouge caf)
Can't make my mind up if I'm in team Ronaldo or team Ronald-no. Hated the tranny twat when he played for the rags, but can't say I've been bothered by him much since he left them. From a footballing perspective it's a given he'd do well for us with the service he'd get, and god knows we need a quality finisher. He's better value than Kane (thank fuck that saga's over) even if we pay a £25m transfer fee plus his salary. BUT at the end of the day, he's still ex-rag Ronaldo......
What is better for the club…..?
And the answer is a forward who scores goals. Who he played for a decade ago is largely irrelevant. I do get he is a divisive character but he would be a relatively cheap short term solution.
Would we say no to Haaland because of his agent?
Would we say no to Mbappe because he has expressed a desire to play for Madrid?
Would we have said no to Lukaku because he also was a rag?
Most players these days at the top end of the market could have something in their background or history that we don’t like but if they signed for us they become one of us. Think Tevez and Bellamy and Goater to name just three