Mase wrote:1 goal in 10 Prem games this season. I’d like to thank Levy for refusing to take our calls - is he a City fan?
Nick wrote:Hope we dont get back in. I think he will.
Vindicates all us blues that didnt want him.
carl_feedthegoat wrote:What an incredible 125 million saving we have made by not buying him.
The City hierarchy should 100% refuse to even go anywhere near Kane from now on .
At his age , he was never worth that money when he was was on form let alone now he’s fucking shit.
Haaland or we spend much less on some other decent YOUNG forward
PeterParker wrote:carl_feedthegoat wrote:What an incredible 125 million saving we have made by not buying him.
The City hierarchy should 100% refuse to even go anywhere near Kane from now on .
At his age , he was never worth that money when he was was on form let alone now he’s fucking shit.
Haaland or we spend much less on some other decent YOUNG forward
Agree, I think his attitude speaks volumes. Things didn't go his way, but he didn't put the effort into it to get things done.
Sounds like a coward to me.
Hazy2 wrote:PeterParker wrote:carl_feedthegoat wrote:What an incredible 125 million saving we have made by not buying him.
The City hierarchy should 100% refuse to even go anywhere near Kane from now on .
At his age , he was never worth that money when he was was on form let alone now he’s fucking shit.
Haaland or we spend much less on some other decent YOUNG forward
Agree, I think his attitude speaks volumes. Things didn't go his way, but he didn't put the effort into it to get things done.
Sounds like a coward to me.
A tad harsh, we don’t know why we did not get him but a guess is Levy renamed on his agreement with the player, we had 100 mill on the table allegedly so that suggests we will be back if we get the nod from Spurs.
carl_feedthegoat wrote:Hazy2 wrote:PeterParker wrote:carl_feedthegoat wrote:What an incredible 125 million saving we have made by not buying him.
The City hierarchy should 100% refuse to even go anywhere near Kane from now on .
At his age , he was never worth that money when he was was on form let alone now he’s fucking shit.
Haaland or we spend much less on some other decent YOUNG forward
Agree, I think his attitude speaks volumes. Things didn't go his way, but he didn't put the effort into it to get things done.
Sounds like a coward to me.
A tad harsh, we don’t know why we did not get him but a guess is Levy renamed on his agreement with the player, we had 100 mill on the table allegedly so that suggests we will be back if we get the nod from Spurs.
We will be back ? It should be a Sackable offense if anyone at City buys Kane now .
He’s fallen off a cliff and his performances are dire .
Steer well clear !
Hazy2 wrote:PeterParker wrote:carl_feedthegoat wrote:What an incredible 125 million saving we have made by not buying him.
The City hierarchy should 100% refuse to even go anywhere near Kane from now on .
At his age , he was never worth that money when he was was on form let alone now he’s fucking shit.
Haaland or we spend much less on some other decent YOUNG forward
Agree, I think his attitude speaks volumes. Things didn't go his way, but he didn't put the effort into it to get things done.
Sounds like a coward to me.
A tad harsh, we don’t know why we did not get him but a guess is Levy renamed on his agreement with the player, we had 100 mill on the table allegedly so that suggests we will be back if we get the nod from Spurs.
PeterParker wrote:Hazy2 wrote:PeterParker wrote:carl_feedthegoat wrote:What an incredible 125 million saving we have made by not buying him.
The City hierarchy should 100% refuse to even go anywhere near Kane from now on .
At his age , he was never worth that money when he was was on form let alone now he’s fucking shit.
Haaland or we spend much less on some other decent YOUNG forward
Agree, I think his attitude speaks volumes. Things didn't go his way, but he didn't put the effort into it to get things done.
Sounds like a coward to me.
A tad harsh, we don’t know why we did not get him but a guess is Levy renamed on his agreement with the player, we had 100 mill on the table allegedly so that suggests we will be back if we get the nod from Spurs.
He doesn't seem the type who would go all in, that is why I think he is like that.
Players these days usually (sadly) decide when they go, it is what it is. All in all, Kane did not put a formal transfer request, came out with that post saying he is staying, which looked really piss-poor, then instead of playing, he turned to shit, I think on purpose.
Why would you do that? Sends the wrong message about you.
I wouldn't want a player like that near our squad. When things are not going his way let me act like a child.
There are many players that forced their way out. He could have done it and I am sure the fans would have understood.
Hazy2 wrote:He is a goal machinePeterParker wrote:Hazy2 wrote:PeterParker wrote:carl_feedthegoat wrote:What an incredible 125 million saving we have made by not buying him.
The City hierarchy should 100% refuse to even go anywhere near Kane from now on .
At his age , he was never worth that money when he was was on form let alone now he’s fucking shit.
Haaland or we spend much less on some other decent YOUNG forward
Agree, I think his attitude speaks volumes. Things didn't go his way, but he didn't put the effort into it to get things done.
Sounds like a coward to me.
A tad harsh, we don’t know why we did not get him but a guess is Levy renamed on his agreement with the player, we had 100 mill on the table allegedly so that suggests we will be back if we get the nod from Spurs.
He doesn't seem the type who would go all in, that is why I think he is like that.
Players these days usually (sadly) decide when they go, it is what it is. All in all, Kane did not put a formal transfer request, came out with that post saying he is staying, which looked really piss-poor, then instead of playing, he turned to shit, I think on purpose.
Why would you do that? Sends the wrong message about you.
I wouldn't want a player like that near our squad. When things are not going his way let me act like a child.
There are many players that forced their way out. He could have done it and I am sure the fans would have understood.
Sideshow Bob wrote:can't believe what i'm reading. some on here would be happy if we went back in for this aging, overrated, cowardly carthorse?? after all he and that shithole club of his have dragged us through, not only this time but many times prior?? smdh.
Hazy2 wrote:We would not get him but Pep would develop Greenwood into the player at 17 many in Manchester were aware of. Left field but he is wasted at the scum and going backwards.
salford city wrote:Hazy2 wrote:We would not get him but Pep would develop Greenwood into the player at 17 many in Manchester were aware of. Left field but he is wasted at the scum and going backwards.
Said this myself at weekend. Due to the Portugese, one of him, saint marcus or sancho is going to miss out each game. I rate him as the better prospect, natural finisher. Could try him at left back......
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Hazy2, Mase, Paul68, stupot and 318 guests