***City vs Chelsea official passive aggresive Match thread**

[sheblue]

For those who think we're fine without a top striker.
Today is the game that proves that is wrong.

For me a 0-0 is fine, no need to force this, we do not HAVE to win, they do.

[Mase]

For those who think we're fine without a top striker.
Today is the game that proves that is wrong.

For me a 0-0 is fine, no need to force this, we do not HAVE to win, they do.

Exactly. Just bide our time. At some point they’ll have to attack us.

[Beefymcfc]

Commentator just called it the “Emptyhad” by accident and corrected himself

Heard that and immediately called him a Scouse cunt.

[Harry Dowd scored]

Camel gob " I am neutral i don't like both reams " what a prick

[Dubaimancityfan]

For those who think we're fine without a top striker.
Today is the game that proves that is wrong.

For me a 0-0 is fine, no need to force this, we do not HAVE to win, they do.

A top striker would have scored that Grealish chance, no denying that. Imagine Kun in that situation !!

[PeterParker]

BIG ED!

[mr_nool]

Big Ed!

[Harry Dowd scored]

Good save, but fuck me we were open then

[PeterParker]

Did we come back from the dressing room at half time?

[Dimples]

I will be very surprised if this games finishes 0-0.
Unfortunately it could go either way.
Grealish is beginning to make Sterling look clinical.

[mr_nool]

That was actually good cross. One of our forwards should've been in that space.

[Harry Dowd scored]

Thats were we need a striker

[Dameerto]

That was actually good cross. One of our forwards should've been in that space.

That's twice now when we've had no one to exploit them.

[PeterParker]

What the fuck was with that free kick?
Wake the fuck up Kevin!

[mr_nool]

I'm starting to doubt if we will ever see Tinton back at his top level again (apart from in short glimpses).

[Dimples]

That was actually good cross. One of our forwards should've been in that space.

That's twice now when we've had no one to exploit them.

As everyone is saying, this game proves that we need a clinical center forward.
It is in the tight matches that we are really strugging, not for chane creation but for converting those chances.

[Dameerto]

That was actually good cross. One of our forwards should've been in that space.

That's twice now when we've had no one to exploit them.

As everyone is saying, this game proves that we need a clinical center forward.
It is in the tight matches that we are really strugging, not for chane creation but for converting those chances.

Our centre forwards tend to stretch defences the way Pep uses them though, so it's very possible the forward would be the one crossing.

[PeterParker]

I'm starting to doubt if we will ever see Tinton back at his top level again (apart from in short glimpses).

Agree. But I wouldn't sell him, even if I think we can get really good money for him.
I am sentimental.

[mr_nool]

That was actually good cross. One of our forwards should've been in that space.

That's twice now when we've had no one to exploit them.

As everyone is saying, this game proves that we need a clinical center forward.
It is in the tight matches that we are really strugging, not for chane creation but for converting those chances.

Our centre forwards tend to stretch defences the way Pep uses them though, so it's very possible the forward would be the one crossing.

I miss the days of Sterling and Sane tapping then in at the back post.

[Nigels Tackle]

azpilicueta looks like that nonce john barrowman