Sideshow Bob wrote:even if sterling's replacement lacks his outright pace and movement, the likely upgrade in nearly everything else - possession, passing, decision making, defending, finishing, and courage in big games - would more than make up for it. sterling has held us back for 2+ years and now wants out. it's time to move on.
john68 wrote:Though I remain one of Sterlings biggest critics, my biggest criticism being his indecision in front of goal and therefore the wasteage of good scoring opportunities, plus his inability to score what many of us consider to be sitters. He does however often ( as JC says) get us upfield quickly as well as scoring his share of goals.
Losing Sterling means that those qualities and goals have to be replaced. Do we currently have anyone who can supply that speed of attack and those goals as well as giving us improved decision making and shooting accuracy in front of goal?
Mase wrote:Bern isn’t going. He’ll buy a house in Cheshire and have a baby.
patrickblue wrote:Mase wrote:Bern isn’t going. He’ll buy a house in Cheshire and have a baby.
But he hasn't got a womb!
Where's the foetus going to gestate?
In a box?
Mase wrote:patrickblue wrote:Mase wrote:Bern isn’t going. He’ll buy a house in Cheshire and have a baby.
But he hasn't got a womb!
Where's the foetus going to gestate?
In a box?
That’s not very woke of you Patrick. Don’t you know men can have babies now. What a world we live in
zuricity wrote:Mase wrote:patrickblue wrote:Mase wrote:Bern isn’t going. He’ll buy a house in Cheshire and have a baby.
But he hasn't got a womb!
Where's the foetus going to gestate?
In a box?
That’s not very woke of you Patrick. Don’t you know men can have babies now. What a world we live in
it is the right of every man ( or woman).
john@staustell wrote:zuricity wrote:Mase wrote:patrickblue wrote:Mase wrote:Bern isn’t going. He’ll buy a house in Cheshire and have a baby.
But he hasn't got a womb!
Where's the foetus going to gestate?
In a box?
That’s not very woke of you Patrick. Don’t you know men can have babies now. What a world we live in
it is the right of every man ( or woman).
Judean People's Front?
Original Dub wrote:Thank God this guy's agent has football development all figured out and helped his client dodge the know-nothing shit box that is the City Academy.
https://www.hitc.com/en-gb/2022/06/21/i ... ster-city/
sheblue wrote:What's all this bullshit about Neymar.
Just No. Just don't even think about it.
Dimples wrote:When Liverpool sell a player the figure in the media is the max transfer value (basic transfer fee + potential future extras)
When Liverpool sign a player the figure in the media is the min transfer value. (basic transfer fee)
The opposite when reporting on our players.
Mase wrote:Dimples wrote:When Liverpool sell a player the figure in the media is the max transfer value (basic transfer fee + potential future extras)
When Liverpool sign a player the figure in the media is the min transfer value. (basic transfer fee)
The opposite when reporting on our players.
Just saw that. They got £27m for Mane and it’s being reported as £35m
Same happened when we bought Sterling. We paid £44m - Liverpool got £35m and QPR got the rest. It was never reported that way.
nottsblue wrote:Mase wrote:Dimples wrote:When Liverpool sell a player the figure in the media is the max transfer value (basic transfer fee + potential future extras)
When Liverpool sign a player the figure in the media is the min transfer value. (basic transfer fee)
The opposite when reporting on our players.
Just saw that. They got £27m for Mane and it’s being reported as £35m
Same happened when we bought Sterling. We paid £44m - Liverpool got £35m and QPR got the rest. It was never reported that way.
Saw an article the other day saying bu the time agent fees and other costs are factored on then Haaland and Nunez cost the same. When do they EVER factor in agent fees and such in reporting transfers
Never
Dimples wrote:When Liverpool sell a player the figure in the media is the max transfer value (basic transfer fee + potential future extras)
When Liverpool sign a player the figure in the media is the min transfer value. (basic transfer fee)
The opposite when reporting on our players.
Mase wrote:Dimples wrote:When Liverpool sell a player the figure in the media is the max transfer value (basic transfer fee + potential future extras)
When Liverpool sign a player the figure in the media is the min transfer value. (basic transfer fee)
The opposite when reporting on our players.
Just saw that. They got £27m for Mane and it’s being reported as £35m
Same happened when we bought Sterling. We paid £44m - Liverpool got £35m and QPR got the rest. It was never reported that way.
Dubciteh wrote:Dimples wrote:When Liverpool sell a player the figure in the media is the max transfer value (basic transfer fee + potential future extras)
When Liverpool sign a player the figure in the media is the min transfer value. (basic transfer fee)
The opposite when reporting on our players.
Bbc did this with minamino today, how fuckinh strange? Never seen it with any other club. Anything to make them look better.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Pretty Boy Lee, Wonderwall and 243 guests