stupot wrote:Prestwich Blue on twitter who is normally pretty good and close to the mark has said for a while it's basically 3 charges that have been elevated to over 100 and they haven't a leg to stand on. Apparently he's said the 4th charge which is the only one we might lose is the not co operating and I can't see much more than a small fine punishment for that.
Mase wrote:I have a special folder with screenshots of posts from muppets that were over the moon when we were charged. Can’t wait to bring these out and inject the tears into my veins.
carl_feedthegoat wrote:Mase wrote:I have a special folder with screenshots of posts from muppets that were over the moon when we were charged. Can’t wait to bring these out and inject the tears into my veins.
Our club will still give these cunts VIP access to the lounge to feast on our VIO buffets during matches .
Pisses me off and they should be banned , period!
sheblue wrote:OK so, if this is true, what about the tarnishing of our reputation on a world stage.
Who pays for that?
patrickblue wrote:sheblue wrote:OK so, if this is true, what about the tarnishing of our reputation on a world stage.
Who pays for that?
That's what we should be suing over. Never mind banning the red shite media, just play them at their own silly game.
If and when we're cleared, then sue for defamation.
Dunne's Half-Time Pint wrote:patrickblue wrote:sheblue wrote:OK so, if this is true, what about the tarnishing of our reputation on a world stage.
Who pays for that?
That's what we should be suing over. Never mind banning the red shite media, just play them at their own silly game.
If and when we're cleared, then sue for defamation.
If we sue for defamation there's a decent chance of a court order requiring disclosure and inspection of all of the relevant non-privileged documents (including emails, whatsapps etc.). Be like letting piranhas into the paddling pool.
patrickblue wrote:Dunne's Half-Time Pint wrote:patrickblue wrote:sheblue wrote:OK so, if this is true, what about the tarnishing of our reputation on a world stage.
Who pays for that?
That's what we should be suing over. Never mind banning the red shite media, just play them at their own silly game.
If and when we're cleared, then sue for defamation.
If we sue for defamation there's a decent chance of a court order requiring disclosure and inspection of all of the relevant non-privileged documents (including emails, whatsapps etc.). Be like letting piranhas into the paddling pool.
Depends on what we've got to hide.
sheblue wrote:OK so, if this is true, what about the tarnishing of our reputation on a world stage.
Who pays for that?
john@staustell wrote:sheblue wrote:OK so, if this is true, what about the tarnishing of our reputation on a world stage.
Who pays for that?
In my view there's clearly been a conspiracy against City regarding this, all along. We know who the main culprits are. Conspiracy is a serious crminal offence in Britain, if not elsewhere, so I'd have been reporting our evidence - which we surely have - to the police.
Slim wrote:john@staustell wrote:sheblue wrote:OK so, if this is true, what about the tarnishing of our reputation on a world stage.
Who pays for that?
In my view there's clearly been a conspiracy against City regarding this, all along. We know who the main culprits are. Conspiracy is a serious crminal offence in Britain, if not elsewhere, so I'd have been reporting our evidence - which we surely have - to the police.
conspiracy
noun
a secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful.
It does require them to be somewhat secretive. It would be less obvious if they bought advertising space at the Etihad to announce their plan.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Blue In Bolton, Scatman and 182 guests