CTID Hants wrote:No no no not Stones?
carl_feedthegoat wrote:CTID Hants wrote:No no no not Stones?
Why play him for nearly the whole game ?
No need.
CTID Hants wrote:No no no not Stones?
blues2win wrote:A fair result. We need a point for 90 which would be nice. My only concern is with Stones. Hopefully nothing serious.
ayrshireblue wrote:Poor VAR decision. Defender pulls Haaland first then is weak when pulled back and appeals for the foul rather than actually defend the situation. The type of thing Otamendi was guilty of on some occasions.
zuricity wrote:ayrshireblue wrote:Poor VAR decision. Defender pulls Haaland first then is weak when pulled back and appeals for the foul rather than actually defend the situation. The type of thing Otamendi was guilty of on some occasions.
agreed, very poor decision , the defender is pushing Haarland too . goal would be given against us or elsewhere.
zuricity wrote:ayrshireblue wrote:Poor VAR decision. Defender pulls Haaland first then is weak when pulled back and appeals for the foul rather than actually defend the situation. The type of thing Otamendi was guilty of on some occasions.
agreed, very poor decision , the defender is pushing Haarland too . goal would be given against us or elsewhere.
Indianablue wrote:zuricity wrote:ayrshireblue wrote:Poor VAR decision. Defender pulls Haaland first then is weak when pulled back and appeals for the foul rather than actually defend the situation. The type of thing Otamendi was guilty of on some occasions.
agreed, very poor decision , the defender is pushing Haarland too . goal would be given against us or elsewhere.
Disagree, defender put his hand against his chest, standard jockeying play. Haaland then grab his arm and shirt and pull him off balance. Didn't need to do it. i thought the ref wasn't giving us much all night, but on this occassion he was correct. Brighton were more cynical than us with tactical fouls , that young dutch lad should have seen red
carolina-blue wrote:zuricity wrote:ayrshireblue wrote:Poor VAR decision. Defender pulls Haaland first then is weak when pulled back and appeals for the foul rather than actually defend the situation. The type of thing Otamendi was guilty of on some occasions.
agreed, very poor decision , the defender is pushing Haarland too . goal would be given against us or elsewhere.
That’s what everyone but the commentators and the ref var saw the guy had his arm in Haalands chest
Wankers
Original Dub wrote:Could have been a haaland hatrick. For the last two games in a row.
Hope to fuck he takes out his frustration on the rags and inter
johnny crossan wrote:Their equaliser was pretty good, bit like the ones by Villa & Everton
zuricity wrote:Indianablue wrote:zuricity wrote:ayrshireblue wrote:Poor VAR decision. Defender pulls Haaland first then is weak when pulled back and appeals for the foul rather than actually defend the situation. The type of thing Otamendi was guilty of on some occasions.
agreed, very poor decision , the defender is pushing Haarland too . goal would be given against us or elsewhere.
Disagree, defender put his hand against his chest, standard jockeying play. Haaland then grab his arm and shirt and pull him off balance. Didn't need to do it. i thought the ref wasn't giving us much all night, but on this occassion he was correct. Brighton were more cynical than us with tactical fouls , that young dutch lad should have seen red
Sorry, i'm coming back on this. Pushing a player is a foul. he didn't put his hand on Haarlands chest he actually pushed him , which is a foul, probably why Haarland was trying to stabalise himself. We have seen it creep into the game this season whereby players think it is ok to simply push other players - a foul. the refs have let it go. I would have pulled them up for it. Keep your hands down.
clearly Haarland has grasped the shirt, ask why he was off balance .
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 217 guests