Sweeping to our left he took out the ball, the centre forward and one or two advertising hoardings as well, then trotted back into position

sheblue wrote:salford city wrote:nottsblue wrote:salford city wrote:Sparklehorse wrote:I thought I’d pop over to Sky to read all about City’s World Club Championship game. Not a single mention surprise surprise
Whilst they wouldn't usually push us, our game is on TNT and although it is earlier, SLY have the Carabao Cup to push. Fuck em the bitter cunts
But you can watch fucking Gobber and Ratboy play fucking darts. Unless they were throwing them at each other, who in the right mind would watch that
A fucking disgrace how there at 2pm was not a single word about the game
No suprise though from SLY. Consistent, I will give them that
Nothing new in this. They have a long reputation of ignoring any sport or sporting event that they do not have rights to cover.
They have been doing it for years, probably since day one.
Sky Sports News my arse.
' their pathetic rag blister reporting our game tonight will be ecstaticblues2win wrote:And Pep wins BBC coach of the Year and City win BBC team of the year.
patrickblue wrote:Loads of stuff in the media about the fabled atmosphere at clanfield, after klipperty had a moan about it.
It's like the king with no clothes, and now it's been pointed out they're all agreeing it's mediocre.
carolina-blue wrote:Sparklehorse wrote:I thought I’d pop over to Sky to read all about City’s World Club Championship game. Not a single mention surprise surprise
There will be if we lose U can bet on that
carolina-blue wrote:carolina-blue wrote:Sparklehorse wrote:I thought I’d pop over to Sky to read all about City’s World Club Championship game. Not a single mention surprise surprise
There will be if we lose U can bet on that
Just caught Sly’s advert for victims v Arse lol
“While the champions are on holiday” they can’t
Even say we are in the world Club Finals
Poor bastards -Hurting much ? lol
ayrshireblue wrote:Sky are even more full of shit than usual this morning. "The pivotal point came when City were controversially awarded a penalty." Amazon tried hard last night to get someone to say it shouldn't have been a penalty but couldn't because, rightly or wrongly, the laws of the game say a penalty must be awarded for the handball. In yesterdays Edinburgh derby Hibs were awarded a similar penalty and nobody made any issue of it, in fact the commentators phrase was "Is that a handball? Yes it was!"
Even the non-award of a penalty for Liverpool against Arsenal has been dragged out as an excuse not to give us the penalty - "Why is that a penalty if the Odegaard one wasn't". That was a wrong decision and should have been a penalty but should not influence other incidents.
Mase wrote:ayrshireblue wrote:Sky are even more full of shit than usual this morning. "The pivotal point came when City were controversially awarded a penalty." Amazon tried hard last night to get someone to say it shouldn't have been a penalty but couldn't because, rightly or wrongly, the laws of the game say a penalty must be awarded for the handball. In yesterdays Edinburgh derby Hibs were awarded a similar penalty and nobody made any issue of it, in fact the commentators phrase was "Is that a handball? Yes it was!"
Even the non-award of a penalty for Liverpool against Arsenal has been dragged out as an excuse not to give us the penalty - "Why is that a penalty if the Odegaard one wasn't". That was a wrong decision and should have been a penalty but should not influence other incidents.
That’s not a recent rule change - that’s always been classed as a penalty. Defending diving in with his arm in the air and it stops the shot from going towards goal. I’m not sure why they’re wheeling this nonsense out.
Mase wrote:ayrshireblue wrote:Sky are even more full of shit than usual this morning. "The pivotal point came when City were controversially awarded a penalty." Amazon tried hard last night to get someone to say it shouldn't have been a penalty but couldn't because, rightly or wrongly, the laws of the game say a penalty must be awarded for the handball. In yesterdays Edinburgh derby Hibs were awarded a similar penalty and nobody made any issue of it, in fact the commentators phrase was "Is that a handball? Yes it was!"
Even the non-award of a penalty for Liverpool against Arsenal has been dragged out as an excuse not to give us the penalty - "Why is that a penalty if the Odegaard one wasn't". That was a wrong decision and should have been a penalty but should not influence other incidents.
That’s not a recent rule change - that’s always been classed as a penalty. Defending diving in with his arm in the air and it stops the shot from going towards goal. I’m not sure why they’re wheeling this nonsense out.
Mase wrote:You think back to last season where the Rags got that dodgy penalty in the final where the ball might have grazed Jack’s finger tips. THAT is a proper dodgy one - not last nights!
nottsblue wrote:Mase wrote:You think back to last season where the Rags got that dodgy penalty in the final where the ball might have grazed Jack’s finger tips. THAT is a proper dodgy one - not last nights!
Absolutely
Actually pointed this out to a rag last night after he was banging on about the penalty. Of course he hadn't seen it, just read about on Sky and the BBC and being a fan of a red shirt, just took it as gospel
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: city72, Majestic-12 [Bot] and 222 guests