Here is the place to talk about all things city and football!
by ruralblue » Mon Mar 11, 2024 7:45 pm
Profitability and sustainability rules scrapped.
Clubs in Europe to be allowed to spend 70% of their revenue on players.
Come on Mr 68 old boy, explain it in simpleton terms for us Yarkshire fuckwits.
Is it good or bad for us?
I haven't a fecking clue what I'm doing! Gillie come back man I want my sig back. As the Photobucket thingy gone?
-
ruralblue
- Bert Trautmann's Neck
-
- Posts: 12135
- Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 2:27 pm
- Supporter of: MANCHESTER CITY
- My favourite player is: KOMPANY / SILVA
by CTID Hants » Mon Mar 11, 2024 11:23 pm
ruralblue wrote:Profitability and sustainability rules scrapped.
Clubs in Europe to be allowed to spend 70% of their revenue on players.
Come on Mr 68 old boy, explain it in simpleton terms for us Yarkshire fuckwits.
Is it good or bad for us?
No surprise, that CUNT Gill is the treasure of uefa, rags get cash injection and corrupt uefa relax the rules is my take (not read owt about other than what Jim posted).
Born A Blue

-

CTID Hants
- Donated to the site

- Kaptain Kompany's Komposure
-
- Posts: 14663
- Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2005 1:33 pm
- Location: Farnborough, Hampshire
by Bluemoon4610 » Tue Mar 12, 2024 7:21 am
CTID Hants wrote:ruralblue wrote:Profitability and sustainability rules scrapped.
Clubs in Europe to be allowed to spend 70% of their revenue on players.
Come on Mr 68 old boy, explain it in simpleton terms for us Yarkshire fuckwits.
Is it good or bad for us?
No surprise, that CUNT Gill is the treasure of uefa, rags get cash injection and corrupt uefa relax the rules is my take (not read owt about other than what Jim posted).
From what I've read about this, it is just the PL following the UEFA model of PSRs. As at least 7 PL clubs play in Europe every year they've had to follow these rules already, as well as making sure they stayed inside the old PL rules. This just means everyone now follows the same single set of rules. Not sure if it's good or bad news, though...
-
Bluemoon4610
- De Jong's Tackle
-
- Posts: 1824
- Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2013 10:01 pm
- Location: Block 105 or County Durham
- Supporter of: Manchester City
- My favourite player is: Father Ruben
by nottsblue » Tue Mar 12, 2024 8:26 am
I’ll guarantee it benefits the rags
It doesn’t really make much difference to us given we have made profit most years in the last 7
-
nottsblue
- Anna Connell's Vision
-
- Posts: 32204
- Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 5:17 pm
- Location: Nottingham
- Supporter of: manchester city
- My favourite player is: niall Quinn & Kun
by Mase » Tue Mar 12, 2024 8:43 am
nottsblue wrote:I’ll guarantee it benefits the rags
It doesn’t really make much difference to us given we have made profit most years in the last 7
As usual, it stops the likes of Villa and Newcastle from pushing the red shite out. Why these moronic just keep voting for shite that is invented by United, Liverpool and Arsenal is totally baffling. They deserve all they get.
-
Mase
- Anna Connell's Vision
-
- Posts: 43784
- Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 10:08 pm
- Location: The North Pole.
- Supporter of: Warnock's Ref Rants
- My favourite player is: Danny Tiatto
by blues-clues » Tue Mar 12, 2024 12:19 pm
Not sure how it would advantage Utd. The money coming in is not revenue - it is investment, the purchase of the 25% of shares will just go to the Glazers. Extra money being put in by Ineos or Radcliffe doesn't seem to be in the form of sponsorship or other income does it? It does simplify the rules if they get rid of all the other nonsense but I have no clue why PL teams would agree to this, it perpetuates the CL cartel. If you have an extra £40-£100m coming in from finishing top 4 with Prem Prixe and TV money plus CL progress and TV income you can far more easily maintain that position and income than a team that is not allowed to invest. Crap business model for owners. If they are genuinely dropping all the unenforceable rules you have to wonder what impliactions for the 115 charges.
-

blues-clues
- Donated to the site

- Kinky's Mazy Dribbles
-
- Posts: 2081
- Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 11:57 pm
- Supporter of: Man City
- My favourite player is: Joe Corrigan
by nottsblue » Tue Mar 12, 2024 12:30 pm
blues-clues wrote:Not sure how it would advantage Utd. The money coming in is not revenue - it is investment, the purchase of the 25% of shares will just go to the Glazers. Extra money being put in by Ineos or Radcliffe doesn't seem to be in the form of sponsorship or other income does it? It does simplify the rules if they get rid of all the other nonsense but I have no clue why PL teams would agree to this, it perpetuates the CL cartel. If you have an extra £40-£100m coming in from finishing top 4 with Prem Prixe and TV money plus CL progress and TV income you can far more easily maintain that position and income than a team that is not allowed to invest. Crap business model for owners. If they are genuinely dropping all the unenforceable rules you have to wonder what impliactions for the 115 charges.
If it’s revenue based then the current top 6/7 will be fine as the revenues are in excess of 300m upwards and double for us and the rags and dippers. The London clubs not far behind. If you then assume you can 70% of turnover, then that is a lot more than the current PSR margins. Of course it means increased debt but the American owners don’t seem to mind that
-
nottsblue
- Anna Connell's Vision
-
- Posts: 32204
- Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 5:17 pm
- Location: Nottingham
- Supporter of: manchester city
- My favourite player is: niall Quinn & Kun
by blues2win » Tue Mar 12, 2024 1:53 pm
We have to follow the UEFA rules anyway. Sounds positive for City to me. Much simpler to have one set of rules.
-
blues2win
- Kaptain Kompany's Komposure
-
- Posts: 14822
- Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 11:03 am
- Supporter of: manchester city
- My favourite player is: david silva
by zuricity » Tue Mar 12, 2024 10:40 pm
Eventually thrown out by the EU for unfair competition
"Well I'll go to the foot of our stairs."
-
zuricity
- Allison's Big Fat Cigar
-
- Posts: 18215
- Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 10:54 pm
- Location: Zuerich,ch
by patrickblue » Tue Mar 12, 2024 10:52 pm
zuricity wrote:Eventually thrown out by the EU for unfair competition
I just wonder why it hasn't yet
[img]https://giphy.com/gifs/3o7qDYcso3azifQVyg/html5[/img]
-

patrickblue
- Donated to the site

- Shaun Goater's 103 Goals
-
- Posts: 7425
- Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 9:49 pm
- Location: Newbury Berks
- Supporter of: City
- My favourite player is: The one and only Goat
by zuricity » Tue Mar 12, 2024 11:05 pm
patrickblue wrote:zuricity wrote:Eventually thrown out by the EU for unfair competition
I just wonder why it hasn't yet
Once Bayern hit the rails.....
"Well I'll go to the foot of our stairs."
-
zuricity
- Allison's Big Fat Cigar
-
- Posts: 18215
- Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 10:54 pm
- Location: Zuerich,ch
by patrickblue » Wed Mar 13, 2024 9:20 pm
zuricity wrote:patrickblue wrote:zuricity wrote:Eventually thrown out by the EU for unfair competition
I just wonder why it hasn't yet
Once Bayern hit the rails.....
Sounds about right.
[img]https://giphy.com/gifs/3o7qDYcso3azifQVyg/html5[/img]
-

patrickblue
- Donated to the site

- Shaun Goater's 103 Goals
-
- Posts: 7425
- Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 9:49 pm
- Location: Newbury Berks
- Supporter of: City
- My favourite player is: The one and only Goat
Return to The Maine Football forum
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: BlueinBosnia, CTID Hants, john@staustell, Mase, Nickyboy, nottsblue, PeterParker, salford city and 280 guests