Why fix something thats not broken?

Here is the place to talk about all things city and football!

Re: Why fix something thats not broken?

Postby Mark (Blue Army) » Wed Mar 24, 2010 9:53 pm

Did you expect anything else??? the man really is clueless
[center]Image[/center][center]"City fans are born not manufactured, We do not choose we are chosen
Those that don't understand don't matter, Those that understand need no explanation"[/center]
User avatar
Mark (Blue Army)
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Shaun Goater's 103 Goals
 
Posts: 7915
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 1:52 pm
Location: Manchester / Dublin
Supporter of: Manchester City

Re: Why fix something thats not broken?

Postby david yearsley » Wed Mar 24, 2010 9:57 pm

I blame Irelands granny, bird , sister or whoever the fucl it was ;)
The world is your oyster but your future´s a clam
User avatar
david yearsley
Rosler's Grandad Bombed The Swamp
 
Posts: 3739
Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2006 11:19 am
Location: alicante, españa

Re: Why fix something thats not broken?

Postby Dubciteh » Wed Mar 24, 2010 9:57 pm

maybe because rsc was injured and Vieira and gaz arent fit enough for two games in 3 days? baffling but prob an honest explanaion to it. Shouldve brough on rsc for ireland thats what made no sense.
derby day the scores were level,
then the goat was fed by neville,
silly boy should know for sure,
feed the goat and he will score!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
User avatar
Dubciteh
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Denis Tueart's Overhead
 
Posts: 8628
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 5:49 am
Location: Dublin
Supporter of: CTID
My favourite player is: Merlin

Re: Why fix something thats not broken?

Postby Dingus McDouchey » Wed Mar 24, 2010 9:58 pm

Santa Cruz is not fit and Garrido looked a weak link vs Fulham. SImple.
Had nothing to do with the team selection, and everything to do with our shit passing, touch, and lack of creativity.
Berbatov wins golden boot, spends following season on the bench while his team loses title on goal difference. Well played, Fergie.
User avatar
Dingus McDouchey
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Richard Dunne's Own Goals
 
Posts: 928
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 9:36 pm

Re: Why fix something thats not broken?

Postby Grob » Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:11 pm

When you have a system which worked so well at Fulham and in the second half at sunderland, you shouldnt abandon it like we did tonight at kick off. change the personel by all means if they physically cannot play, but dont revert back to what proven not to work against teams who are tried and trusted and well drilled.
Image
Grob
Yaya's Wembley Winning Strikes
 
Posts: 15012
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 10:20 pm
Location: London

Re: Why fix something thats not broken?

Postby Original Dub » Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:13 pm

I said it in the match thread, we lost because we made too many changes, both before and during the game.

The man is addicted to changes. Sometimes the right thing to do is nothing at all.
Original Dub
 

Re: Why fix something thats not broken?

Postby Moonchesteri » Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:14 pm

It's not as black and white though. Every game is different.
And first when we changed to 4-4-2 they passed the ball around in midfield with ease, just because of that extra man they had there. They had all the time a man available to pass to. That's why Mancini went for 3 central midfielders I believe.
Had we not, once again, fallen asleep in a set-piece situation I think we would have gone to score first and Mancini would have had it spot on. Now a mistake that had nothing to do with the formation may have lost us the game.
Moonchesteri
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Neil Young's FA Cup Winning Goal
 
Posts: 11443
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 2:58 pm
Location: Blue moon
Supporter of: MCFC

Re: Why fix something thats not broken?

Postby Niall Quinns Discopants » Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:14 pm

It's hard to fault the system though as Mancini did EVERYTHING that critics have been asking him to do. We started out with way too much energy, which led into us running out of steam. We switched to all conquering 4-4-2. Hell, we even had targetman there...not that he won single header.

Personally I thought tactics were fucking horrible today. But hey, all the wishes were granted.
Sometimes we're good and sometimes we're bad but when we're good, at least we're much better than we used to be and when we are bad we're just as bad as we always used to be, so that's got to be good hasn't it?


Mark Radcliffe
User avatar
Niall Quinns Discopants
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 40255
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 1:19 pm
Location: Deep in the pimp game
Supporter of: Holistic approach
My favourite player is: Bishop Magic Don Juan

Re: Why fix something thats not broken?

Postby Grob » Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:18 pm

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:It's hard to fault the system though as Mancini did EVERYTHING that critics have been asking him to do. We started out with way too much energy, which led into us running out of steam. We switched to all conquering 4-4-2. Hell, we even had targetman there...not that he won single header.

Personally I thought tactics were fucking horrible today. But hey, all the wishes were granted.


The damage was done before the much maligned RSC came on. The confidence had been sapped, the players playing some desperate stuff.
Image
Grob
Yaya's Wembley Winning Strikes
 
Posts: 15012
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 10:20 pm
Location: London

Re: Why fix something thats not broken?

Postby branny » Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:19 pm

Our midfield gave em far too much room. They still had loads of time and space when we were playing 4-5-1. Judging by the two games this season Moyes has us well and truly sussed out.
Balotelli......that's a brilliant finish.
branny
Dickov's Injury Time Equaliser
 
Posts: 4336
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 5:53 pm
Supporter of: God's own club
My favourite player is: Tueart

Re: Why fix something thats not broken?

Postby Original Dub » Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:19 pm

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:It's hard to fault the system though as Mancini did EVERYTHING that critics have been asking him to do. We started out with way too much energy, which led into us running out of steam. We switched to all conquering 4-4-2. Hell, we even had targetman there...not that he won single header.

Personally I thought tactics were fucking horrible today. But hey, all the wishes were granted.


Its more than just a lineup, its the general slow play in our own half and kicking it back to Shay when we know we're running out of time.

If it was only about how you line the team up, I'd manage them and have them top four. But he is a coach and has sent the players out with strict instructions. Sure, they may underperform in the odd game, but negative play is something they are being told to do.
Original Dub
 

Re: Why fix something thats not broken?

Postby gillie » Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:29 pm

We where on an unbeaten run of games and Mancio turns into Ranieri ala tinkerman.Imho Mancini will be the reason if we dont make top 4.
User avatar
gillie
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Pablo Zabaleta's Manc Accent
 
Posts: 13894
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 10:55 pm
Location: our house
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: Colin Bell

Re: Why fix something thats not broken?

Postby Blue2 » Wed Mar 24, 2010 11:28 pm

Svensational wrote:
Mark ( Blue Army ) wrote:Did you expect anything else??? the man really is clueless


Well yeah, I expected him to keep the same line up?

And ok RSC picked up an injury at Fulham but he looked ok for the 30mins he played tonight.

V funny. shite as usual is what I saw. - not on his own though>
User avatar
Blue2
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Shaun Goater's 103 Goals
 
Posts: 7165
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 9:13 am
Location: Manchester
Supporter of: Hanging
My favourite player is: Aguerooooooooooooooo

Re: Why fix something thats not broken?

Postby MaineRoadMemories » Wed Mar 24, 2010 11:33 pm

I think he keeps changing it cos he manages with fear of what the opposition can do rather than what we can do to them if we play our own game. I've seen enough of Mancini now to think that this is how he manages. He might achieve top 4 but a man who manages based on fear will never win us the league.
User avatar
MaineRoadMemories
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Joe Hart's 29 Clean Sheets
 
Posts: 5740
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 9:11 pm
Location: Crewe
Supporter of: THE CHAMPIONS!!!!!!!
My favourite player is: VINCENT KOMPANY

Re: Why fix something thats not broken?

Postby Douglas Higginbottom » Wed Mar 24, 2010 11:36 pm

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:It's hard to fault the system though as Mancini did EVERYTHING that critics have been asking him to do. We started out with way too much energy, which led into us running out of steam. We switched to all conquering 4-4-2. Hell, we even had targetman there...not that he won single header.

Personally I thought tactics were fucking horrible today. But hey, all the wishes were granted.


The wishes were granted? What wishes were they as I guess the majority expected the same side as the Fulham game.

Bottom line was Everton played really well and never gave us a second where it mattered. Started out with too much energy is a new one and I don't buy it at all. I really struggled to see what the plan was tonight and although we put some pressure on at times I don;t think we looked like scoring.They doubled up on a danger men to snuff them out and we gave them too much time.

Played badly ,lost so onto the next game.

PS RSC was not injured
Douglas Higginbottom
Paul Power's Tash
 
Posts: 10685
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 10:42 pm

Re: Why fix something thats not broken?

Postby gillie » Wed Mar 24, 2010 11:43 pm

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:It's hard to fault the system though as Mancini did EVERYTHING that critics have been asking him to do. We started out with way too much energy, which led into us running out of steam. We switched to all conquering 4-4-2. Hell, we even had targetman there...not that he won single header.

Personally I thought tactics were fucking horrible today. But hey, all the wishes were granted.

Your just a Mancini licker and he cost us a Wembley appearance and has now lost our unbeaten home record by his baffling team selections.But at least you post when the chosen one fucks up unlike one other not to be named champion of him.
User avatar
gillie
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Pablo Zabaleta's Manc Accent
 
Posts: 13894
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 10:55 pm
Location: our house
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: Colin Bell

Re: Why fix something thats not broken?

Postby the_georgian_genius » Thu Mar 25, 2010 12:23 am

It's not fucking rocket science is it boys?

Santa Cruz came off with an injury on Fulham
Vieria will struggle to play two games on the trot (cue the standard reply of "why did we sign him then")
Piennar and the strength of Cahill against Garrido? Do me a favour.


But it's all so simple to the little football managers on here isn't it?
the_georgian_genius
Rosler's Grandad Bombed The Swamp
 
Posts: 3484
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 4:08 pm

Re: Why fix something thats not broken?

Postby Niall Quinns Discopants » Thu Mar 25, 2010 5:40 am

gillie wrote:
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:It's hard to fault the system though as Mancini did EVERYTHING that critics have been asking him to do. We started out with way too much energy, which led into us running out of steam. We switched to all conquering 4-4-2. Hell, we even had targetman there...not that he won single header.

Personally I thought tactics were fucking horrible today. But hey, all the wishes were granted.

Your just a Mancini licker and he cost us a Wembley appearance and has now lost our unbeaten home record by his baffling team selections.But at least you post when the chosen one fucks up unlike one other not to be named champion of him.


Which part of "PERSONALLY I THOUGHT TACTICS WERE FUCKING HORRIBLE" you don't understand? I DO think Mancini would be the one for us in long term but we were shite last night and that was Mancini trying too hard to be an Englishman.

I have no idea where people come with these we were negative last night comments. We weren't. We were overly positive. And I said this when we signed Santa Cruz and Hughes was banging on how this would give us different dimension, PLAYING LONG BALLS TO BOX FOR TARGETMAN AGAINST TEAMS LIKE EVERTON, STOKE AND FUCKING BOLTON IS GOING TO DO US NO GOOD. Hopefully he'll take that on board. Only way we are going to score against side like Everton is to keep the ball on the ground and pass our way through them.
Sometimes we're good and sometimes we're bad but when we're good, at least we're much better than we used to be and when we are bad we're just as bad as we always used to be, so that's got to be good hasn't it?


Mark Radcliffe
User avatar
Niall Quinns Discopants
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 40255
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 1:19 pm
Location: Deep in the pimp game
Supporter of: Holistic approach
My favourite player is: Bishop Magic Don Juan

Re: Why fix something thats not broken?

Postby Piccsnumberoneblue » Thu Mar 25, 2010 7:58 am

One look at the line up and you just knew it was wrong. Wrong starting line up and wrong changes. Shite.
City and sniffing knickers.
Come on Blues.
Piccsnumberoneblue
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Pablo Zabaleta's Manc Accent
 
Posts: 13353
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 10:09 pm
Location: Weirdosville.
Supporter of: Us

Re: Why fix something thats not broken?

Postby john@staustell » Thu Mar 25, 2010 8:35 am

Even setting aside the principle of not changing a winning team, I thought very early on we were missing Santa Cruz and Vieira. Tevez was being bullied and NDJ has no forward thought process. Not sure about Garrido though :)
“I may be drunk, Miss, but in the morning I will be sober and you will still be ugly.”
User avatar
john@staustell
Roberto Mancini's Scarf
 
Posts: 20296
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 9:35 am
Location: St Austell
Supporter of: City

Next

Return to The Maine Football forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: city72, Hazy2, Majestic-12 [Bot], Mase, Nickyboy, salford city, Scatman and 221 guests