Mancini vs Hughes, Statistically

Here is the place to talk about all things city and football!

Re: Mancini vs Hughes, Statistically

Postby DoomMerchant » Tue Mar 30, 2010 5:21 pm

cunt. twat. etc.

sorry, someone had to step up.

cheers
viVa el ciTy!

"All things considered, there's absolutely no escape from this hellish situation. I'm prepared to take the coward's way out if you are. It's reincarnation or nothing." -- Gideon Stargrave

Image
User avatar
DoomMerchant
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Pellegrini's Hoodie
 
Posts: 22332
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 6:46 pm
Location: Orlando, FL
Supporter of: MCFC. OK.
My favourite player is: The Game

Re: Mancini vs Hughes, Statistically

Postby btajim » Tue Mar 30, 2010 5:43 pm

They might be statistically better under Mancini - but it's Hughes' Team and will be until a core number of players have been signed by the new man. Hopefully they'll be more astute than Vieira's signing!

I personally won't listen to anything else about this until the season has finished.
carl_feedthegoat wrote:Btajim.
Hi Garry,I just wanted to shake your hand and ask you a question.I go to COMS as mucha as possible but sometimes I cannot leave the house as Sophie.....sorry..Sophie is my Cat...... needs a carer when Im away and sometimes I cannot find one.
My question is ; Is it possible to bring Sophie to matches at COMS in her kitten box and can she come in for free?
User avatar
btajim
Bert Trautmann's Neck
 
Posts: 12509
Joined: Tue Jul 18, 2006 6:44 pm
Location: London's glorious East End
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: Nigel De Jong

Re: Mancini vs Hughes, Statistically

Postby petrov » Tue Mar 30, 2010 5:46 pm

bottom line is and its rarely i agree with nqdp, i want city to win not entertain, i'm still not convinced by mancini but you can't argue with his record, especially when you take the cups out of the equation.

yes we play shite football, but were we playing the exact same way and top of the league no one would say they are less likely to watch the shite we serve up. I want trophies, I want city to become the greatest club in football history, regardless of whether we play 6 defensive midfielders or 9 strikers.

As for we won't see the real mancini football till he brings in his own players, bullshit. I watch alot of italian football and inter always played simular to us just in a softer league with a stronger squad.

I'd rather see those rag cunts tear down that banner than see it go past 40 years despite entertaining football.
petrov
Tevez's Golfing Holiday
 
Posts: 782
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 4:48 pm

Re: Mancini vs Hughes, Statistically

Postby brite blu sky » Tue Mar 30, 2010 6:00 pm

petrov wrote:bottom line is and its rarely i agree with nqdp, i want city to win not entertain, i'm still not convinced by mancini but you can't argue with his record, especially when you take the cups out of the equation.

yes we play shite football, but were we playing the exact same way and top of the league no one would say they are less likely to watch the shite we serve up. I want trophies, I want city to become the greatest club in football history, regardless of whether we play 6 defensive midfielders or 9 strikers.

As for we won't see the real mancini football till he brings in his own players, bullshit. I watch alot of italian football and inter always played simular to us just in a softer league with a stronger squad.

I'd rather see those rag cunts tear down that banner than see it go past 40 years despite entertaining football.


says it all imo.

also rigsby see the 3-0 and crap thread for all the results v entertainment arguments
[center]Image[/center]
User avatar
brite blu sky
Dickov's Injury Time Equaliser
 
Posts: 4995
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 7:23 pm
Location: Barcelona

Re: Mancini vs Hughes, Statistically

Postby Blue Since 76 » Tue Mar 30, 2010 6:25 pm

Although i'm bored rigid watching mancini's team, i was annoyed watching hughes', as i felt he'd blown a lot of cash on poor players. If i was in charge, i'd want to know what roberto's style of play would be with his own players before i gave him a penny, but assuming he's negative as he doesn't trust the defensive qualities, he deserves a summer to bring in who he wants.

As much as i'm not convinced, who is there with a better record who would come? There's probably only a handful and a lot of them aren't proven at premier league level either. Mancini is younger than hughes and could be the manager to build a legacy. Hopefully.
Blue Since 76
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Joe Hart's 29 Clean Sheets
 
Posts: 5965
Joined: Tue May 06, 2008 9:37 pm

Re: Mancini vs Hughes, Statistically

Postby zuricity » Tue Mar 30, 2010 7:07 pm

blue wine wrote:
Dazzacity wrote:And as for the stats..

*Your comparing a guy that has loads of premiership experiance in playing and managing.A guy that previuosly had a whole season at the club under his belt.A guy that was given the chance to spend shit loads of cash on HIS own signings.

*To a guy that was thrown in half way through a season.Had no experiance in managing a Prem side.Had no real chance of spending large sums of money which resulted in him having to come in and find his feet with another managers squad without havin a pre-season to sus out the best playing style and selection. And he still ends up lookin the better of the two..


^^this
well said my friend


I'll third that . Nothing against showing stats though.

It's good that people realise there's more to it than just the stats.

Entertaining football, does that only mean goals ?

There have been some very good scoreless games over the years. Sometimes a 1-0 victory belies the 'boring' tag.
"Well I'll go to the foot of our stairs."
zuricity
Allison's Big Fat Cigar
 
Posts: 18425
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 10:54 pm
Location: Zuerich,ch

Re: Mancini vs Hughes, Statistically

Postby Dameerto » Tue Mar 30, 2010 7:28 pm

I get the feeling Italians don't like the mid season transfer window too much (based on nothing but my gut, which could just be wind) - and suspect the Dapper Don thought the squad was ok enough to tread water until the summer. If he stays with us he could well do some substantial tinkering to stamp his 'brand' onto it, we might have to say goodbye to a familiar face or two.
VIVA EL CITIES

"The adjudicatory chamber of the Ethics Committee ... has banned Mr Joseph S. Blatter ... for eight years and Mr Michel Platini ... for eight years from all football-related activities (administrative, sports or any other) on a national and international level. The bans come into force immediately." - 21/12/2015
User avatar
Dameerto
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Allison's Big Fat Cigar
 
Posts: 18703
Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2009 7:08 pm
Supporter of: El City
My favourite player is: Sergio Forwardo

Re: Mancini vs Hughes, Statistically

Postby zuricity » Tue Mar 30, 2010 8:08 pm

Oh and whilst everyone's bitching and moaning. Did you see the way Kompany turned on ( turned around and bollocked) Toure
in the second half for not talking/communicating with him about a Wigan attack that broke down. City were already winning at the time. I found it an unusual thing for Kompany, normally so quiet/reserved. He did lay into Toure though.

Statistically more likely to screw up with toure playing than when he's not playing ( and no I don't have the stats either).
"Well I'll go to the foot of our stairs."
zuricity
Allison's Big Fat Cigar
 
Posts: 18425
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 10:54 pm
Location: Zuerich,ch

Re: Mancini vs Hughes, Statistically

Postby Niall Quinns Discopants » Tue Mar 30, 2010 8:13 pm

zuricity wrote:Oh and whilst everyone's bitching and moaning. Did you see the way Kompany turned on ( turned around and bollocked) Toure
in the second half for not talking/communicating with him about a Wigan attack that broke down. City were already winning at the time. I found it an unusual thing for Kompany, normally so quiet/reserved. He did lay into Toure though.

Statistically more likely to screw up with toure playing than when he's not playing ( and no I don't have the stats either).


I saw it and thought he was right to do it. Toure did his best trying to throw the game. And in that instance it was his lack of basic movement, covering for his centerback pair when he goes for the ball, that lead into bollocking.

Toure is a liability. Can't wait to see Lescott back in action.
Sometimes we're good and sometimes we're bad but when we're good, at least we're much better than we used to be and when we are bad we're just as bad as we always used to be, so that's got to be good hasn't it?


Mark Radcliffe
User avatar
Niall Quinns Discopants
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 40255
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 1:19 pm
Location: Deep in the pimp game
Supporter of: Holistic approach
My favourite player is: Bishop Magic Don Juan

Re: Mancini vs Hughes, Statistically

Postby Pretty Boy Lee » Wed Mar 31, 2010 12:12 am

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:
zuricity wrote:Oh and whilst everyone's bitching and moaning. Did you see the way Kompany turned on ( turned around and bollocked) Toure
in the second half for not talking/communicating with him about a Wigan attack that broke down. City were already winning at the time. I found it an unusual thing for Kompany, normally so quiet/reserved. He did lay into Toure though.

Statistically more likely to screw up with toure playing than when he's not playing ( and no I don't have the stats either).


I saw it and thought he was right to do it. Toure did his best trying to throw the game. And in that instance it was his lack of basic movement, covering for his centerback pair when he goes for the ball, that lead into bollocking.

Toure is a liability. Can't wait to see Lescott back in action.

Agreed. Toure has been the dissapointment of the season for me. Kompany tho is becoming everything I thought kolo would. All he needs is the armband.
Tracking back is overrated.
Image
Pretty Boy Lee
Pablo Zabaleta's Manc Accent
 
Posts: 13386
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 1:22 am
Location: Brisbane baby!
Supporter of: City!
My favourite player is: Yaya

Re: Mancini vs Hughes, Statistically

Postby Douglas Higginbottom » Wed Mar 31, 2010 3:07 pm

I have never liked the way stats are trotted out to try to prove a point. There are always arguments why they are quite valid bla bla.
I have been away for a few days but the first thing I thought when reading this was that the stats have come out before we get through our tough home run of Brum,Scum,Villa and Spurs. Almsot as if thank god we beat Wigan so I can get some stats out. Playing at home against those 4 like we did against Everton and Wigan might just turn the stats the other way!!

That's the cynic in me. I hope to hell they don't and the stats looke as good or even better at the end of the season.
Douglas Higginbottom
Paul Power's Tash
 
Posts: 10685
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 10:42 pm

Re: Mancini vs Hughes, Statistically

Postby brite blu sky » Wed Mar 31, 2010 4:23 pm

Douglas Higginbottom wrote:I have never liked the way stats are trotted out to try to prove a point. There are always arguments why they are quite valid bla bla.
I have been away for a few days but the first thing I thought when reading this was that the stats have come out before we get through our tough home run of Brum,Scum,Villa and Spurs. Almsot as if thank god we beat Wigan so I can get some stats out. Playing at home against those 4 like we did against Everton and Wigan might just turn the stats the other way!!

That's the cynic in me. I hope to hell they don't and the stats looke as good or even better at the end of the season.



pmsl
[center]Image[/center]
User avatar
brite blu sky
Dickov's Injury Time Equaliser
 
Posts: 4995
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 7:23 pm
Location: Barcelona

Re: Mancini vs Hughes, Statistically

Postby Dazzacity » Wed Mar 31, 2010 4:31 pm

Douglas Higginbottom wrote:I have never liked the way stats are trotted out to try to prove a point. There are always arguments why they are quite valid bla bla.
I have been away for a few days but the first thing I thought when reading this was that the stats have come out before we get through our tough home run of Brum,Scum,Villa and Spurs. Almsot as if thank god we beat Wigan so I can get some stats out. Playing at home against those 4 like we did against Everton and Wigan might just turn the stats the other way!!

That's the cynic in me. I hope to hell they don't and the stats looke as good or even better at the end of the season.



It wouldnt totally shock me if we had people thinkin like that but in Hughes' favour "Thank fook we lost that game, I can throw some stats up to help towards tryin to convince people that we was wrong to get rid of Hughes".
User avatar
Dazzacity
Kinky's Mazy Dribbles
 
Posts: 2562
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 9:04 pm

Re: Mancini vs Hughes, Statistically

Postby Douglas Higginbottom » Wed Mar 31, 2010 4:57 pm

Dazzacity wrote:
Douglas Higginbottom wrote:I have never liked the way stats are trotted out to try to prove a point. There are always arguments why they are quite valid bla bla.
I have been away for a few days but the first thing I thought when reading this was that the stats have come out before we get through our tough home run of Brum,Scum,Villa and Spurs. Almsot as if thank god we beat Wigan so I can get some stats out. Playing at home against those 4 like we did against Everton and Wigan might just turn the stats the other way!!

That's the cynic in me. I hope to hell they don't and the stats looke as good or even better at the end of the season.



It wouldnt totally shock me if we had people thinkin like that but in Hughes' favour "Thank fook we lost that game, I can throw some stats up to help towards tryin to convince people that we was wrong to get rid of Hughes".



hahaha good try! But they haven't have they?
Douglas Higginbottom
Paul Power's Tash
 
Posts: 10685
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 10:42 pm

Re: Mancini vs Hughes, Statistically

Postby Dazzacity » Wed Mar 31, 2010 5:02 pm

Douglas Higginbottom wrote:
Dazzacity wrote:
Douglas Higginbottom wrote:I have never liked the way stats are trotted out to try to prove a point. There are always arguments why they are quite valid bla bla.
I have been away for a few days but the first thing I thought when reading this was that the stats have come out before we get through our tough home run of Brum,Scum,Villa and Spurs. Almsot as if thank god we beat Wigan so I can get some stats out. Playing at home against those 4 like we did against Everton and Wigan might just turn the stats the other way!!

That's the cynic in me. I hope to hell they don't and the stats looke as good or even better at the end of the season.



It wouldnt totally shock me if we had people thinkin like that but in Hughes' favour "Thank fook we lost that game, I can throw some stats up to help towards tryin to convince people that we was wrong to get rid of Hughes".



hahaha good try! But they haven't have they?


Hehehe..Was just messin. Im sure there isnt a single City fan that would think that way..I hope not anyways!!!
User avatar
Dazzacity
Kinky's Mazy Dribbles
 
Posts: 2562
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 9:04 pm

Re: Mancini vs Hughes, Statistically

Postby john68 » Wed Mar 31, 2010 5:15 pm

There have been times when the smugness of a few on here has tempted me though!!!
I KNOW THAT YOU BELIEVE THAT YOU UNDERSTOOD WHAT YOU THINK I WROTE, BUT I AM NOT SURE YOU REALISE THAT WHAT YOU READ IS NOT WHAT I MEANT
User avatar
john68
Kaptain Kompany's Komposure
 
Posts: 14630
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 4:47 pm
Location: Sittin' on the dock of the bay...wastin' time.
Supporter of: ST MARKS (W GORTON)
My favourite player is: BERT TRAUTMANN

Re: Mancini vs Hughes, Statistically

Postby Spurge » Wed Mar 31, 2010 9:32 pm

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:I already have my tin hat on for all the "cunts" and "twats" etc. So fire at will.

I couldn't resist looking at the results under both managers during this season. They have had basically same squad to work with. I confess that oneof the reasons to look into this was to see whether there was any sense in talk about how Mancini ruined a perfectly good season where we were sailing for fourth spot. However the main reason was to see whether decision to sack Hughes made any statistical sense. Especially as every pundit and their dog have been pointing out that Mancini has already lost more games than Hughes this season. I only took league records into account as I believe Mancini was hired by owners with only one job in mind, to break into top 4.

So here we go.

Hughes:

P-----W----D-----L-----Points-----P.P.G.
17----7-----8-----2------29----------1.71


Mancini:

P-----W----D-----L-----Points-----P.P.G.
14----8-----3-----3------27----------1.93


Now the difference in points per game don't seem that big. Over the season they would equal 65 points under Hughes and 73 points under Mancini. Last season we would've finished 5th with Hughes' points tally and 4th with Mancini's. So in that sense it LOOKS to make sense STATISTICALLY.

And YES, I know they are just statistics but this is just to look at the situation from statistical point of view. There are LOT of other things to concern when sacking and replacing manager. And I don't know why I'm making excuses here. They are just statistical FACTS anyway (unless I counted something wrong, which is very much posible).

Any which way 8-3-3 is pretty good record by anyone's standards imo.


Well done
User avatar
Spurge
Kinky's Mazy Dribbles
 
Posts: 2910
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 9:13 pm
Location: Location Location
Supporter of: MCFC
My favourite player is: Asa Hartford

Re: Mancini vs Hughes, Statistically

Postby BobKowalski » Thu Apr 01, 2010 9:06 am

Dazzacity wrote:And as for the stats..

*Your comparing a guy that has loads of premiership experiance in playing and managing.A guy that previuosly had a whole season at the club under his belt.A guy that was given the chance to spend shit loads of cash on HIS own signings.

*To a guy that was thrown in half way through a season.Had no experiance in managing a Prem side.Had no real chance of spending large sums of money which resulted in him having to come in and find his feet with another managers squad without havin a pre-season to sus out the best playing style and selection. And he still ends up lookin the better of the two..


Not to mention the world and his dog talks about Mancini getting the push at the season end for Mourinho which has to be unsettling as we hit squeaky bum time - which is another factor in all of this. The next 7 games are huge and we will see what the players and management are made of. Games are going to be tighter, tenser affairs no matter who is in charge. We stand at the foothills of a tremendous journey and God alone knows how it will pan out in the next two months. All I want for us is to win the game and reach that first base camp of a top 4 spot. Mancini can grind/bore/batter us to victory I don't give a fuck as long as he does it.

And if the prospect of us being in at the sharp end of the season doesn't excite you then you must be dead.
BobKowalski
Richard Dunne's Own Goals
 
Posts: 936
Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2009 3:07 pm

Re: Mancini vs Hughes, Statistically

Postby Niall Quinns Discopants » Thu Apr 01, 2010 9:13 am

BobKowalski wrote:
Dazzacity wrote:And as for the stats..

*Your comparing a guy that has loads of premiership experiance in playing and managing.A guy that previuosly had a whole season at the club under his belt.A guy that was given the chance to spend shit loads of cash on HIS own signings.

*To a guy that was thrown in half way through a season.Had no experiance in managing a Prem side.Had no real chance of spending large sums of money which resulted in him having to come in and find his feet with another managers squad without havin a pre-season to sus out the best playing style and selection. And he still ends up lookin the better of the two..


Not to mention the world and his dog talks about Mancini getting the push at the season end for Mourinho which has to be unsettling as we hit squeaky bum time - which is another factor in all of this. The next 7 games are huge and we will see what the players and management are made of. Games are going to be tighter, tenser affairs no matter who is in charge. We stand at the foothills of a tremendous journey and God alone knows how it will pan out in the next two months. All I want for us is to win the game and reach that first base camp of a top 4 spot. Mancini can grind/bore/batter us to victory I don't give a fuck as long as he does it.

And if the prospect of us being in at the sharp end of the season doesn't excite you then you must be dead.


Spot on as always.

At this stage of the season and where we are in league table, I can barely think about such inferior things as quality of football. It's all about getting one result at the time and try and claim that 4th spot by any means necessary. A real edge of the seat stuff in itself. Regardless of who is in charge.
Sometimes we're good and sometimes we're bad but when we're good, at least we're much better than we used to be and when we are bad we're just as bad as we always used to be, so that's got to be good hasn't it?


Mark Radcliffe
User avatar
Niall Quinns Discopants
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 40255
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 1:19 pm
Location: Deep in the pimp game
Supporter of: Holistic approach
My favourite player is: Bishop Magic Don Juan

Re: Mancini vs Hughes, Statistically

Postby Ted Hughes » Thu Apr 01, 2010 9:14 am

BobKowalski wrote:
Dazzacity wrote:And as for the stats..

*Your comparing a guy that has loads of premiership experiance in playing and managing.A guy that previuosly had a whole season at the club under his belt.A guy that was given the chance to spend shit loads of cash on HIS own signings.

*To a guy that was thrown in half way through a season.Had no experiance in managing a Prem side.Had no real chance of spending large sums of money which resulted in him having to come in and find his feet with another managers squad without havin a pre-season to sus out the best playing style and selection. And he still ends up lookin the better of the two..


Not to mention the world and his dog talks about Mancini getting the push at the season end for Mourinho which has to be unsettling as we hit squeaky bum time - which is another factor in all of this. The next 7 games are huge and we will see what the players and management are made of. Games are going to be tighter, tenser affairs no matter who is in charge. We stand at the foothills of a tremendous journey and God alone knows how it will pan out in the next two months. All I want for us is to win the game and reach that first base camp of a top 4 spot. Mancini can grind/bore/batter us to victory I don't give a fuck as long as he does it.

And if the prospect of us being in at the sharp end of the season doesn't excite you then you must be dead.


Looks more like he's standing there confused & puddling us to victory imo but if it works good luck to him. 'Luck' possibly being the key word.
The pissartist formerly known as Ted

VIVA EL CITY !!!

Some take the bible for what it's worth.. when they say that the rags shall inherit the Earth...
Well I heard that the Sheikh... bought Carlos Tevez this week...& you fuckers aint gettin' nothin..
Ted Hughes
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Colin Bell's Football Brain
 
Posts: 28488
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 4:28 pm
Supporter of: Bill Turnbull
My favourite player is: Bill Turnbull

PreviousNext

Return to The Maine Football forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 143 guests