by Colin the King » Sun May 23, 2010 2:11 am
Reading through a few different threads tonight got me thinking about the topic of where we're potentially getting some of our players from. There seems to be a debate raging about whether certain players (a.k.a Milner) are good enough to join us, and whether we'd benefit more from concentrating on buying players from teams above/with a higher profile than ourselves, to properly progress.
It's interesting and I thought a thread in itself to discuss it might be worthwhile.
My own point of view is that in a lot of cases, these players from 'inferior' sides thrive under a higher quality of conditions/teammates/management and therefore grow into world class players over a period of time. Looking at the country's top two sides at the moment you'll see influential players signed from the likes of Wigan, Fulham, Bolton and Everton.
Would it not be fair to assume in Milner, or Arteta, or Hangeland (I know we're not linked to him) that their high levels of performance would stand a good chance of improving vastly when accompanied by better teammates?
It just seems that with high profile signings there comes a huge weight of expectation- if you're Robinho or Kaká or Torres your every move is scrutinised and a lot of the 'megastars' just don't seem to cope very well under those circumstances. Think of all the supposed world beaters who've flopped miserably in England over the years.
A side issue is mentality. City could go off and spend £800million and still finish 5th next season. Look at Réal Madrid- not a sausage in return for all the expenditure and hype that went with it last Summer. Having eleven players that cost a shitload and used to play for one of the elite sides in Europe is no guarantee of success- in fact it might even be a hindrance. The likelihood is that those players saw a big pot of gold and ran as fast as possible towards it. With players from midtable sides, of course a better wage is attractive, but it's a natural career progression. Even Villa to City, today in 2010 is (an albeit small) step forward. If players are moving backwards, ala Robinho at the time of his arrival, you have to question their true motive.
If you move to City now from a smaller club, you're instantly not as significant as you used to be. You're not the big fish in a small pond, so you have to work hard to impress everyone and show that you're good enough to be in their company. I just feel that these players, the best of the rest, might have more natural desire and willingness to improve themselves and work hard for the cause, rather than coming with a 'world owes me a living' attitude.
Thoughts?