Thursdays Rag Post Of The Day

[Beeks]

RAG1: You can hate a team for a lot of reasons other than fear and jealousy.

Most people realise that what City are doing isn't honorable and simply isn't good for football.



RAG2: honourable no. but they arent breaking any rules.

its not good for football and it leaves a nasty taste in my mouth and its nowt to do with man city.

but are you saying that if an investor gave man utd 200m to spend on players you would be against it?

i certainly wouldnt,

city's problem is that they have SO much money that they can spend 200m, make a total hash of it, wright that 200m off and then spend another 200m and still not make a dent in the bank balance.

either way, im pretty confident that no matter how much it takes, no matter how long it takes, one way or another they are going to win the premier league and eventually possibly the CL too.

ive dealt with that already and excepted it.

the difference is they will still be man city. not man utd. and they never will be.

there is only so much money can buy. class, pedigree, history and that feeling, that aura you get around our ground and the 4,000 chinese folk with cameras on any given tuesday taking pictures of the place arent one of them.

[strike]WAG[/strike] RAG OF THE DAY

[Fish111]

The difference is they will still be man city. not man utd. and they never will be.

Thank god for that. Prick!

[Chopper]

RAG1: You can hate a team for a lot of reasons other than fear and jealousy. Agreed

Most people realise that what City are doing isn't honorable and simply isn't good for football. American Spelling



RAG2: honourable no. but they arent breaking any rules. Do you now wish we had picked berbatov up?

its not good for football and it leaves a nasty taste in my mouth and its nowt to do with man city. Prawn Sandwich?

but are you saying that if an investor gave man utd 200m to spend on players you would be against it? Missing word is Actually

i certainly wouldnt, wouldnt 200 mill be better off spent addressing the principle?

city's problem is that they have SO much money that they can spend 200m, make a total hash of it, wright that 200m off and then spend another 200m and still not make a dent in the bank balance. We could refinance it if you would prefer

either way, im pretty confident that no matter how much it takes, no matter how long it takes, one way or another they are going to win the premier league and eventually possibly the CL too. We are too bitter to allow that

ive dealt with that already and excepted it. Theres a good lad

the difference is they will still be man city. not man utd. and they never will be. We know, we will have to Wright it off and Except it.

there is only so much money can buy. class, pedigree, history and that feeling, that aura you get around our ground and the 4,000 chinese folk with cameras on any given tuesday taking pictures of the place arent one of them. Didnt you lot farm that market?

[strike]WAG[/strike] RAG OF THE DAY

On house arrest already?

[Beeks]

These rags on the forums are really delusional...every one of them to a man thinks Yaya is on 220k a week and that Balotelli is demanding 300k a week

Where the fuck do they pull these numbers from?!

[Blue in the face]

[quote="IanBishopsHaircut"]These rags on the forums are really delusional...every one of them to a man thinks Yaya is on 220k a week and that Balotelli is demanding 300k a week

Where the fuck do they pull these numbers from?![/quote]


That would be sky sports news.


That rag kid looks more like a R. Madrid or Barca supporter.

[Scatman]

These rags on the forums are really delusional...every one of them to a man thinks Yaya is on 220k a week and that Balotelli is demanding 300k a week

Where the fuck do they pull these numbers from?!

with the 50% tax rate just around the corner, 220k is probably not too far wide of the mark

[Blue Toy]

the 4,000 chinese folk with cameras on any given tuesday taking pictures of the place

The cock considers that to be a positive? Oh dear.

[simon12]

RAG1: You can hate a team for a lot of reasons other than fear and jealousy.

However you don`t

Most people realise that what City are doing isn't honorable and simply isn't good for football.

Neither was buying Ryan Giggs mum a washing machine or buying veron in 2000 for £28m



RAG2: honourable no. but they arent breaking any rules.

its not good for football and it leaves a nasty taste in my mouth and its nowt to do with man city.

Swallow quicker!!

but are you saying that if an investor gave man utd 200m to spend on players you would be against it?

i certainly wouldnt,

The gimp you`re talking to wouldn`t either

city's problem is that they have SO much money that they can spend 200m, make a total hash of it, wright that 200m off and then spend another 200m and still not make a dent in the bank balance.

Booooo

either way, im pretty confident that no matter how much it takes, no matter how long it takes, one way or another they are going to win the premier league and eventually possibly the CL too.

Pennies dropped

ive dealt with that already and excepted it.

Liar

the difference is they will still be man city. not man utd. and they never will be.

You`ll be blue in 5 years dick`ed

there is only so much money can buy. class, pedigree, history and that feeling, that aura you get around our ground and the 4,000 chinese folk with cameras on any given tuesday taking pictures of the place arent one of them.

i know nothing about supporting a team, where they are from, or what embarrases their hardcore.