Lawro has spoken

Here is the place to talk about all things city and football!

Re: Lawro has spoken

Postby ryanmjo » Sat Aug 21, 2010 2:40 am

I think 2-0 or 2-1 to City. A draw might not be the worst thing in the world though.
ryanmjo
Tevez's Golfing Holiday
 
Posts: 710
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 6:18 pm

Re: Lawro has spoken

Postby Esky » Sat Aug 21, 2010 2:52 am

Grob wrote:As long as we play a striker, I think we'll be ok


After following Australia at the WC, I've really had enough of teams playing 6 midfielders.
User avatar
Esky
Dickov's Injury Time Equaliser
 
Posts: 4412
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2006 1:41 pm
Location: Melbourne
Supporter of: The Blue Ship

Re: Lawro has spoken

Postby Crossie » Sat Aug 21, 2010 8:29 am

I had a dream about it, a hard fought game which was 1-1 until the 90th minute, when Tevez scored 2-1, they kicked off, and we went right back up and Jo scored the 3rd for an emotional City till I die 3-1
Crossie
Denis Law's Backheel
 
Posts: 9874
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 4:51 pm
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: Vinny

Re: Lawro has spoken

Postby colonel_muck » Sat Aug 21, 2010 1:05 pm

johnpb78 wrote:
john@staustell wrote:A 1-1 draw - a sure sign that he actually expects defeat and hopes to get away without a hiding:

MONDAY

Manchester City v Liverpool (2000 BST)


City did not really play with a centre forward in the goalless draw at Tottenham last weekend, which was strange. They had Carlos Tevez up front, with David Silva playing off him, but it did not work because Tevez likes to roam all over the pitch. City need to address that but manager Roberto Mancini probably won't know his best team yet. Will new signings James Milner and Mario Balotelli be involved against Liverpool? If so, how will they fit in?

When Roy Hodgson was in charge of Fulham, they were extremely hard to get the better off whenever they played away from home. I think Hodgson will continue that trend at Liverpool. This has got draw written all over it.

Prediction: 1-1


Hodgson's away record at Fulham: Played 47, won 7, drawn 18, lost 22.


he didn't say they were unbeatable. he said they were hard to get the better of.
User avatar
colonel_muck
De Jong's Tackle
 
Posts: 1218
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 12:45 pm
Location: Castlefield Manchester
Supporter of: Man city
My favourite player is: David Silva

Re: Lawro has spoken

Postby LookMumImOnMCF.net » Sat Aug 21, 2010 1:44 pm

colonel_muck wrote:
johnpb78 wrote:
john@staustell wrote:A 1-1 draw - a sure sign that he actually expects defeat and hopes to get away without a hiding:

MONDAY

Manchester City v Liverpool (2000 BST)


City did not really play with a centre forward in the goalless draw at Tottenham last weekend, which was strange. They had Carlos Tevez up front, with David Silva playing off him, but it did not work because Tevez likes to roam all over the pitch. City need to address that but manager Roberto Mancini probably won't know his best team yet. Will new signings James Milner and Mario Balotelli be involved against Liverpool? If so, how will they fit in?

When Roy Hodgson was in charge of Fulham, they were extremely hard to get the better off whenever they played away from home. I think Hodgson will continue that trend at Liverpool. This has got draw written all over it.

Prediction: 1-1


Hodgson's away record at Fulham: Played 47, won 7, drawn 18, lost 22.


he didn't say they were unbeatable. he said they were hard to get the better of.


If you look more closely, Mr Muck, you will see that that is not what he says at all.

He clearly said they were "extremely hard to get the better off" which makes no real contextual sense at all.

The possibility here is that Lawro got excited, drunk on his own sense of self importance he got greedy; throwing 'f's around like they were the license payer's money and not giving a damn about the grammatical consequences.

Or, as I suspect is the more likely re-enactment of what has actually happened, john@staustell did not attend the same high class level of copy & paste school that Mark (Blue Army) attended and has become sloppy with his work thinking that eagle eyed forum goers wouldn't recognise these basic errors in his final draft.

Either way it's a sick, twisted world when something like this is allowed to happen.
LookMumImOnMCF.net
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Denis Law's Backheel
 
Posts: 9316
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 5:49 pm
Supporter of: LookMumI'mOnMCF.net
My favourite player is: LookMumI'mOnMCF.net

Re: Lawro has spoken

Postby mr_nool » Sat Aug 21, 2010 1:58 pm

LookMumImOnMCF.net wrote:
colonel_muck wrote:
johnpb78 wrote:
john@staustell wrote:A 1-1 draw - a sure sign that he actually expects defeat and hopes to get away without a hiding:

MONDAY

Manchester City v Liverpool (2000 BST)


City did not really play with a centre forward in the goalless draw at Tottenham last weekend, which was strange. They had Carlos Tevez up front, with David Silva playing off him, but it did not work because Tevez likes to roam all over the pitch. City need to address that but manager Roberto Mancini probably won't know his best team yet. Will new signings James Milner and Mario Balotelli be involved against Liverpool? If so, how will they fit in?

When Roy Hodgson was in charge of Fulham, they were extremely hard to get the better off whenever they played away from home. I think Hodgson will continue that trend at Liverpool. This has got draw written all over it.

Prediction: 1-1


Hodgson's away record at Fulham: Played 47, won 7, drawn 18, lost 22.


he didn't say they were unbeatable. he said they were hard to get the better of.


If you look more closely, Mr Muck, you will see that that is not what he says at all.

He clearly said they were "extremely hard to get the better off" which makes no real contextual sense at all.

The possibility here is that Lawro got excited, drunk on his own sense of self importance he got greedy; throwing 'f's around like they were the license payer's money and not giving a damn about the grammatical consequences.

Or, as I suspect is the more likely re-enactment of what has actually happened, john@staustell did not attend the same high class level of copy & paste school that Mark (Blue Army) attended and has become sloppy with his work thinking that eagle eyed forum goers wouldn't recognise these basic errors in his final draft.

Either way it's a sick, twisted world when something like this is allowed to happen.


Nice to see you back, all though slightly circumcised! I take it all your PM's are lost?
Intelligent Vigilant Person
User avatar
mr_nool
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Colin Bell's Football Brain
 
Posts: 26354
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 8:48 am
Location: Utrecht

Re: Lawro has spoken

Postby LookMumImOnMCF.net » Sat Aug 21, 2010 2:03 pm

mr_nool wrote:
LookMumImOnMCF.net wrote:
colonel_muck wrote:
johnpb78 wrote:
john@staustell wrote:A 1-1 draw - a sure sign that he actually expects defeat and hopes to get away without a hiding:

MONDAY

Manchester City v Liverpool (2000 BST)


City did not really play with a centre forward in the goalless draw at Tottenham last weekend, which was strange. They had Carlos Tevez up front, with David Silva playing off him, but it did not work because Tevez likes to roam all over the pitch. City need to address that but manager Roberto Mancini probably won't know his best team yet. Will new signings James Milner and Mario Balotelli be involved against Liverpool? If so, how will they fit in?

When Roy Hodgson was in charge of Fulham, they were extremely hard to get the better off whenever they played away from home. I think Hodgson will continue that trend at Liverpool. This has got draw written all over it.

Prediction: 1-1


Hodgson's away record at Fulham: Played 47, won 7, drawn 18, lost 22.


he didn't say they were unbeatable. he said they were hard to get the better of.


If you look more closely, Mr Muck, you will see that that is not what he says at all.

He clearly said they were "extremely hard to get the better off" which makes no real contextual sense at all.

The possibility here is that Lawro got excited, drunk on his own sense of self importance he got greedy; throwing 'f's around like they were the license payer's money and not giving a damn about the grammatical consequences.

Or, as I suspect is the more likely re-enactment of what has actually happened, john@staustell did not attend the same high class level of copy & paste school that Mark (Blue Army) attended and has become sloppy with his work thinking that eagle eyed forum goers wouldn't recognise these basic errors in his final draft.

Either way it's a sick, twisted world when something like this is allowed to happen.


Nice to see you back, all though slightly circumcised! I take it all your PM's are lost?


I feel a bit less of a man : (

I don't have any new ones in a while. Did you message me?
LookMumImOnMCF.net
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Denis Law's Backheel
 
Posts: 9316
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 5:49 pm
Supporter of: LookMumI'mOnMCF.net
My favourite player is: LookMumI'mOnMCF.net

Re: Lawro has spoken

Postby mr_nool » Sat Aug 21, 2010 2:12 pm

No, not for at least a couple of weeks (just after the Lekman concert I think). Just wondering; I'd be a bit upset if my pm's disappeared since I have info like phone numbers, etc amongst them. Should probably learn a lesson and write them down. Next time it might be underscores, and not apostrophes, that cause problems.
Intelligent Vigilant Person
User avatar
mr_nool
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Colin Bell's Football Brain
 
Posts: 26354
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 8:48 am
Location: Utrecht

Previous

Return to The Maine Football forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Blue In Bolton, city72, Hazy2, Majestic-12 [Bot], Nick, salford city, sheblue, Sparklehorse, Stan and 213 guests