DoomMerchant wrote:carl_feedthegoat wrote:DoomMerchant wrote:Carl you fucking wind up merchant. Wobble your head.
Cheers
How am I winding anyone up you fuckign daft petrol !!..its a guardian piece not a sun article and it was worth posting.
we are all pissed after the loss, but yr just hearing what you want to hear in this piece CARL. it's nothing. some assclown consultant who got run out of town by Mancini, prollee cuz he was expensive and full of shit, is airing some garbage. i think highly of the Guardian, but this is a nonstory imho. i can't believe you think otherwise.
also, i didn't say it wasn't worth posting. what i said was that i'm shocked you'd give it credence.
cheers
carl_feedthegoat wrote:The Man In Blue wrote:ex employee in "my old boss is shit" shocker.
well you cant use the fucking daily mail bollocks this time around can ya !!
It may well be bollocks......but the fact is we do have loads of injuries.
john68 wrote:By sheer coincidence, I was having a chat about this subject yesterday with a mate of mine who has his coaching badges. Not just about City or football but I think it includes all sportsmen who are the very top end.
I wondered if it could have been caused (paradoxically) by the significant advances in sports science over the last few years. My theory was that, years ago, top athletes who we thought were fit , weren't really anywhere near their physical potential by todays standards. Meaning that the mechanics of the body still had a margin of unused potential before breaking down.
Today, the advances in sports science mean that fitness coaches in all sportsd are able to get athletes' bodies to operate at a much higher level, nearer to the body's limits, leaving little or no margin of safety before the limit is passed and the body breaks down.
Maybe, like a car engine tuned up to its limit and then driven hard for a long distance, giving a great performance but always in danger of breaking down.
I don't suppose for one minute that Bellers had anything to do with this, he's just being used as an example by someone with something to say and the media are doing what they love to do and playing the "blame game," It seems these days, it always has to be someone's fault.
brite blu sky wrote:DoomMerchant wrote:carl_feedthegoat wrote:DoomMerchant wrote:Carl you fucking wind up merchant. Wobble your head.
Cheers
How am I winding anyone up you fuckign daft petrol !!..its a guardian piece not a sun article and it was worth posting.
we are all pissed after the loss, but yr just hearing what you want to hear in this piece CARL. it's nothing. some assclown consultant who got run out of town by Mancini, prollee cuz he was expensive and full of shit, is airing some garbage. i think highly of the Guardian, but this is a nonstory imho. i can't believe you think otherwise.
also, i didn't say it wasn't worth posting. what i said was that i'm shocked you'd give it credence.
cheers
Doomy pal.. you need to review that sentiment, i am firmly on the left side of the P spectrum, but our friends at the Guardian are some of the most biased and twisted journos ever and thats just in general, in football they have a serious agenda against City that is at Editorial level and comes out right across the board of their reporting.
Wise up my man.
That goes for Carl too if you think anything in the Guardian somehow gives something creedence. They are a bunch of bitter c*nts.
john68 wrote:By sheer coincidence, I was having a chat about this subject yesterday with a mate of mine who has his coaching badges. Not just about City or football but I think it includes all sportsmen who are the very top end.
I wondered if it could have been caused (paradoxically) by the significant advances in sports science over the last few years. My theory was that, years ago, top athletes who we thought were fit , weren't really anywhere near their physical potential by todays standards. Meaning that the mechanics of the body still had a margin of unused potential before breaking down.
Today, the advances in sports science mean that fitness coaches in all sportsd are able to get athletes' bodies to operate at a much higher level, nearer to the body's limits, leaving little or no margin of safety before the limit is passed and the body breaks down.
Maybe, like a car engine tuned up to its limit and then driven hard for a long distance, giving a great performance but always in danger of breaking down.
I don't suppose for one minute that Bellers had anything to do with this, he's just being used as an example by someone with something to say and the media are doing what they love to do and playing the "blame game," It seems these days, it always has to be someone's fault.
Ted Hughes wrote:May as well stick this on the Bellamy Bullshit Bandwaggon & roll it on, perhaps one day it'll seem believeable to those who find it easier to accept than the alternative; that he was sacked purely because Mancini doesn't want him.
Back in the real world; I don't think either fitness training method can claim to be perfect. Hughes only had a decimated team available for the notorious game v Spurs & was hardly ever able to name a settled back 4. Barry was clearly carrying an injury all season. It clearly wasn't a bed of roses last season.
Mancini has lost players to internationals & post World Cup syndrome. Only if he continues to have too many players breaking down all through the season can anyone start to assume there could be any truth in this, anything else is unfair. Some of the players have not even reached match fitness yet due to non-City related problems.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: PeterParker, sheblue, stevefromdonny, stupot and 63 guests