patrickblue wrote:Your views please
Douglas Higginbottom wrote:patrickblue wrote:Your views please
hahaha it's funny that when he was saying certain things about City's good fortune I said I bet somebody on the forum will have a real go at him for that. Thanks for delivering. I thought what he said was spot on actually.
They scored a fair goal disallowed we got a goal that was offside and then got a deflected 2nd.It's great to be lucky sometimes.
Burt wrote:Cos he's a devilworshipping, rag bastard mate.
mcfctm wrote:Douglas Higginbottom wrote:patrickblue wrote:Your views please
hahaha it's funny that when he was saying certain things about City's good fortune I said I bet somebody on the forum will have a real go at him for that. Thanks for delivering. I thought what he said was spot on actually.
They scored a fair goal disallowed we got a goal that was offside and then got a deflected 2nd.It's great to be lucky sometimes.
Did you not think Campbell was interfering with play Doug? Thought if we had a goal disallowed like that I would have been annoyed but understood why it wasn't given.
mcfctm wrote:Douglas Higginbottom wrote:patrickblue wrote:Your views please
hahaha it's funny that when he was saying certain things about City's good fortune I said I bet somebody on the forum will have a real go at him for that. Thanks for delivering. I thought what he said was spot on actually.
They scored a fair goal disallowed we got a goal that was offside and then got a deflected 2nd.It's great to be lucky sometimes.
Did you not think Campbell was interfering with play Doug? Thought if we had a goal disallowed like that I would have been annoyed but understood why it wasn't given.
Douglas Higginbottom wrote:patrickblue wrote:Your views please
hahaha it's funny that when he was saying certain things about City's good fortune I said I bet somebody on the forum will have a real go at him for that. Thanks for delivering. I thought what he said was spot on actually.
They scored a fair goal disallowed we got a goal that was offside and then got a deflected 2nd.It's great to be lucky sometimes.
mcfctm wrote:Douglas Higginbottom wrote:patrickblue wrote:Your views please
hahaha it's funny that when he was saying certain things about City's good fortune I said I bet somebody on the forum will have a real go at him for that. Thanks for delivering. I thought what he said was spot on actually.
They scored a fair goal disallowed we got a goal that was offside and then got a deflected 2nd.It's great to be lucky sometimes.
Did you not think Campbell was interfering with play Doug? Thought if we had a goal disallowed like that I would have been annoyed but understood why it wasn't given.
Buffalo Soldier wrote:Douglas Higginbottom wrote:patrickblue wrote:Your views please
hahaha it's funny that when he was saying certain things about City's good fortune I said I bet somebody on the forum will have a real go at him for that. Thanks for delivering. I thought what he said was spot on actually.
They scored a fair goal disallowed we got a goal that was offside and then got a deflected 2nd.It's great to be lucky sometimes.
Their disallowed goal was a correct decision. The guy came within a cunt hair of touching the ball and lescott went over to him after the ball had passed. If dragging a player out of position is not considered interfering with play then I don't know what is.
For tevez's first goal, silva played the ball square, possibly even backward, it was only a deflection which took it into tevez's path. Correct decision again.
s1ty m wrote:mcfctm wrote:Douglas Higginbottom wrote:patrickblue wrote:Your views please
hahaha it's funny that when he was saying certain things about City's good fortune I said I bet somebody on the forum will have a real go at him for that. Thanks for delivering. I thought what he said was spot on actually.
They scored a fair goal disallowed we got a goal that was offside and then got a deflected 2nd.It's great to be lucky sometimes.
Did you not think Campbell was interfering with play Doug? Thought if we had a goal disallowed like that I would have been annoyed but understood why it wasn't given.
He stretched out a leg, so yeah, he was involved with the play and his stretching will have caused interest amongst our defence, thus he was totally involved. Absolutely not a goal.
Douglas Higginbottom wrote:mcfctm wrote:Douglas Higginbottom wrote:patrickblue wrote:Your views please
hahaha it's funny that when he was saying certain things about City's good fortune I said I bet somebody on the forum will have a real go at him for that. Thanks for delivering. I thought what he said was spot on actually.
They scored a fair goal disallowed we got a goal that was offside and then got a deflected 2nd.It's great to be lucky sometimes.
Did you not think Campbell was interfering with play Doug? Thought if we had a goal disallowed like that I would have been annoyed but understood why it wasn't given.
If I put on my blue tinted specs and go back to the days when off side meant offside yhen yes it was off side. But no way at all nowadays should that have been given offside.
Had it been against us death letters would already be on the way to the linesman.
Lev Bronstein wrote:Give it a year or two and he'll be calling the rags Man City. People like him always touch their forelock to the rich and successful. And that'll be us soon.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: ayrshireblue, Bluemoon4610, Majestic-12 [Bot] and 151 guests